Federal judge says Oath Keepers founder poses 'convincing danger,' orders him in jail

[RAMOSS]

Well,, the bid of the Oath Keepers founder to get a bond set for his involvment in the 1/6 riot /insurrection has been denied.

Federal judge says Oath Keepers founder poses 'convincing danger,' orders him in jail

A federal judge said Friday that the founder of the Oath Keepers militia poses a "clear and convincing danger" and ordered him to be held in jail until his trial for the January 6 insurrection.

www.upi.com

 

[beefheart]

He wanted to be remanded to his wife's parent's house, but it came out that they were whack job sovereign citizen idiots.

 

[CaughtInThe]

 

[Schism]

Well,, the bid of the Oath Keepers founder to get a bond set for his involvment in the 1/6 riot /insurrection has been denied.

Federal judge says Oath Keepers founder poses 'convincing danger,' orders him in jail

A federal judge said Friday that the founder of the Oath Keepers militia poses a "clear and convincing danger" and ordered him to be held in jail until his trial for the January 6 insurrection.

www.upi.com

Reading the article, I would agree that the guy sounds dangerous. Here's an interesting quote from the article:

Rhodes allegedly sent encrypted messages through the Signal app in which he implied that his followers should prepare for violence if former President Donald Trump were to not invoke the Insurrection Act after his defeat in the 2020 general election, prosecutors said.

Prosecutors read some of Rhodes' messages in court in which he said Oath Keepers should "prepare to walk the same path as the founding fathers," CNN reported.

"He must know that if he doesn't act, we will. He has to understand that we will have no choice," Rhodes allegedly said in one message.

It sound like he incited the riot, not Trump. In fact, he says "He must know that if he doesn't act, we will. He has to understand that we will have no choice," That pretty much absolves Trump.

Ramoss, have you alerted the 1/6 committee of your findings? Maybe they need a link to the article.

 

[Integrityrespec]

Well,, the bid of the Oath Keepers founder to get a bond set for his involvment in the 1/6 riot /insurrection has been denied.

Federal judge says Oath Keepers founder poses 'convincing danger,' orders him in jail

A federal judge said Friday that the founder of the Oath Keepers militia poses a "clear and convincing danger" and ordered him to be held in jail until his trial for the January 6 insurrection.

www.upi.com

Hold a guy who I don't believe is charged with killing anyone or attempting to kill anyone, but release a guy who attempted to murder a mayoral candidate. Somehow that doesn't make much sense.

 

[RAMOSS]

Hold a guy who I don't believe is charged with killing anyone or attempting to kill anyone, but release a guy who attempted to murder a mayoral candidate. Somehow that doesn't make much sense.

Considering that this person shooting people to overthrow the legit government.. well,

 

[Felis Leo]

Considering that this person shooting people to overthrow the legit government.. well,

Mmmm...I do not think attempted murderers should be allowed on bail any more than ringleaders of putsches should be.

 

[TomFitz]

Mmmm...I do not think attempted murderers should be allowed on bail any more than ringleaders of putsches should be.

He was the apparant leader, or one of the apparant leaders, of the storm troops who insinuated themselves into the crowd with the intended purpose of inciting a riot.

A lot of us, me included, think it’s only a matter of time before the link between them and the plotters in the trump White House will be documented.

 

[The AntiDonald]

Hold a guy who I don't believe is charged with killing anyone or attempting to kill anyone, but release a guy who attempted to murder a mayoral candidate. Somehow that doesn't make much sense.

If I've said it once, I've said it 100 times. Two wrongs don't make a right.

It's quite clear to me the guy who shot at the mayor was a wack job. Stuart Roades was of sound mind and judgement. He wanted violence and conspired to make that happen. A huge difference.

Your whataboutisms just don't add up in this case.

 

[BlueTex]

Hold a guy who I don't believe is charged with killing anyone or attempting to kill anyone, but release a guy who attempted to murder a mayoral candidate. Somehow that doesn't make much sense.

For those unfamiliar with the difference between state and federal law when it comes to bail, it's not surprising it doesn't make much sense...

Kentucky lawmaker seeks to change bail law after Quintez Brown freed from jail in shooting

After a community group posted suspected shooter Quintez Brown's $100,000 bail, a lawmaker says it's time to change the rules.

www.courier-journal.com

 

[The AntiDonald]

He was the apparant leader, or one of the apparant leaders, of the storm troops who insinuated themselves into the crowd with the intended purpose of inciting a riot.

A lot of us, me included, think it’s only a matter of time before the link between them and the plotters in the trump White House will be documented.

Agreed. I have an opinion that the connection moves through Roger Stone, perhaps with Alex Jones in the mix somewhere. I believe both have pleaded the 5th A to the 1-6 committee. Innocent people don't need to plead the 5th.