- Joined
- Mar 29, 2016
- Messages
- 42,324
- Reaction score
- 61,047
- Location
- Houston Area, TX
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Very Liberal
Its a free country and you can be afraid of anyone you choose according to your experience and knowledge of current events
But so can the rest of us - if you don't mind.
Its a free country and you can be afraid of anyone you choose according to your experience and knowledge of current events
But so can the rest of us - if you don't mind.
I don't think Tres wants to be as afraid of the Muslims, liberals, gays, etc. as you are.
I don't think Tres wants to be as afraid of the Muslims, liberals, gays, etc. as you are.
Again, its a free country
But that goes for me as well as you
You can be afraid of whomever you want. You just can't do anything without warrant or reason.
Sure
And Tres is afraid of white kids in her neighborhood
If she locks her doors at night to protect herself from them does that make her a racist anti white bigot?
I know it's a free country, bro. I'm not dumb.
But I'm still going to think it's stupid to buy into the fear mongering that goes around today.
Well white kids do certainly like to shoot up schools.
And you have a legal right to think so
You can even label it as fear mongering even though we have many examples of muslim violence to point to
Just as I have the same right to see the potential danger from muslims because of their background and religious beliefs
If that's your argument, the originally intended 90 days are substantially over and soon to run out.Sure-- it seems you are making an argument for a generic Muslim ban.
The EO is a TEMPORARY ban to ensure that vetting procedures are adequate in those named countries.
So do muslims
You can "see" whatever you want. You just can't DO anything about it. Not without proof or warrant.
I can't
That would make me a vigilante
But trump can
Well white kids do certainly like to shoot up schools.
Not in our country.
But if you want to lock your doors, lock 'em.
If you want to fear monger, go right ahead.
If you want to use the force of government to back up your irrationality...no.
If that's your argument, the originally intended 90 days are substantially over and soon to run out.
So why do we need an order at all, now?
Were the new procedures implemented? If not, why not?
Apparently not, else we wouldn't have this thread.
lol
They cant as long as they are not here
Which is why we want to keep them in their home country
Dont bet the rent money on that
No, the original ban back in January was for 90 days. Around 50 days have passed.And if you don't stop to ask them what the WHO What and WHY's...
The "Travel" ban was 120 days to set up a proper vetting, why is that so terrible?
Unless it was lies.I'm kind of curious what specifically has been done while this ban has been floating around the courts. I mean, since we only needed 90 days, surely we are already well on our way to having extreme vetting measures in place.
Unless it was lies.
Too bad more people weren't afraid of Adam Lanza. There would be a few more fifth graders in Newtown CT today.
Too bad Kim Cates wasn't afraid of former boy scouts from a neighboring town. She wouldn't be in her grave and her daughter wouldn't be bearing scars all over her body and would have both of her feet.