• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

FDNY ordered to hire minorities

insinuating that the judge thinks blacks & Hispanics are simply dumb, is a pretty stupid thing to say.

he believes that a de-facto & gentlemen's agreemant system is in place that discriminates against them, in favor of white applicants.

Again, sheesh, those racist New Yorkers. When do you suppose they will get past it?
 

Care to support these statements?
 
Care to support these statements?

Irish American - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Eating Smoke: Fire in Urban America, 1800-1950 - Mark Tebeau - Google Books

An Introduction to Policing - John S. Dempsey, Linda S. Forst - Google Books

King Institute Resources


I'm not revealing any secrets. Historically civil service institutions have served as a tool of systemic racial discrimination.
 
Historically our entire nation has been racist and sexist to a disgusting degree . . . but are they still?

It's not like us Whites are born with a vernacular that others can't comprehend.
 
Historically our entire nation has been racist and sexist to a disgusting degree . . . but are they still?

Old habits die hard.

It's not like us Whites are born with a vernacular that others can't comprehend.

Who says you are? Most people aren't aware of systemic racism or sexism. They simply exist within the system.
 

It is possible James that we are not party to all of the evidence. I certainly consider it a serious question until I see the entire evidence and arguments made. What bothers me so far is that too many assumptions are being made without examining the evidence the judge saw. One side wants to believe racism is not only alive and well, but pervasive, and the other side wants to believe we're picking on poor white folk. I suspect the truth is not at either extreme.
 

Going to provide any evidence?

Anything that pinpoints the alleged racism in a test?
 

Statistics don't prove ****.

So what... irish people made up a large percentage of the police department.

Irish also made up over 50% of the arrests..... Which mean...... they hated their own people?

No, it means that its all a god damned coincidence that you are trying to use as proof of something.

Statistics don't explain anything without additional evidence.
 
Old habits die hard.



Who says you are? Most people aren't aware of systemic racism or sexism. They simply exist within the system.

Well I just don't see how a test such as that can be 'rewritten' so it's 'dumbed down' or something - it sounds like that's what they're suggesting must be done.

I don't get it: it's a test - you take it, they score it and go from there . . . if hiring isn't based *on* the test then why are they suing *over* the test? They're suing focusing on the test - claiming that it's written for whites - so what does a 'black' test look like? :roll:

If they believe they've been discriminated against then why is the TEST this huge determining factor? Why not the hiring managers, the process - everything else? Focusing on the test is ridiculous because ANYONE can study content and learn and do good on a test. . . can't they? Of course they can.

Are these people saying they're incapable of studying and learning and putting time and effort in order to pass the tests if they really tried?

My son wasn't born stupid just because he's mixed - he's quite capable of learning just like everyone else and when the time comes for him to be employed and if he chooses a career that he knows you MUST test into - I'll be certain to help him study and make it through it. But if he ever fails at anything in life I won't let him use his color as an iota of an excuse.

It's insulting to the entire race / people / culture / region when people stoop to that level.
 
Last edited:
I did. 5 of them. Post 80? Keep up you apologist.

Yeah... Umm.... Nothing you provided pinpoints the alleged racism of this test.

Lets keep the thread on topic.


BTW, one of your links was some rant from a letter to birmingham about blacks in the 1960s... Doesn't seem to have jack **** to do with the topic.
 
Statistics don't prove ****.

If that were all I posted maybe you'd have a point. However I also posted analysis and examples of laws created to restrict minorities from joining civil service institutions. The rest of your post? Nothing but the same old tired apologist nonsense. Why don't you tell us about the time you listened to James Brown? Maybe we'll care.

BTW, one of your links was some rant from a letter to birmingham about blacks in the 1960s... Doesn't seem to have jack **** to do with the topic.

It's called a primary source. Do you know what that is? It's a statement from somebody living at the time. Lol.
 
I always thought special tests of being allowed to score differently was far more racist than the makeup of said force.
 

let's see
they initiated legal action
and they then prevailed
as a LEO, you should be able to comprehend that is a strong indication that there was basis to their claim
 
Are those laws still in place?

Do you have anything relevant to the 21st century? Or are you still living in the 1700s?




It's called a primary source. Do you know what that is? It's a statement from somebody living at the time. Lol.
And it has what to do with the CURRENT "racist" test?
 

Did you read this post:

http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...y-ordered-hire-minorities.html#post1060274304

This is the important part:


Reading is our friend.
 
let's see
they initiated legal action
and they then prevailed
as a LEO, you should be able to comprehend that is a strong indication that there was basis to their claim

No... not when it comes to civil rights law........ Its all based on human emotion, especially in a district court with a judge's emotions reigning over the decision.
 

Statistics are a starting point. However, I do note the Judge does claim long standing discrimination:

Declining to impose racial quotas, Judge Garaufis nonetheless ruled that a systemic effort was required. “It is the court’s view that nearly 40 years of discrimination will not be cured by a few simple tweaks to the city’s policies and practices,” he wrote.

(snip)

Judge Garaufis did not, however, lay blame entirely at Mr. Bloomberg’s feet.

“That this discrimination has been allowed to persist in New York City for so long,” he wrote, “is a shameful blight on the records of the six mayors of this city who failed to take responsibility for doing what was necessary to end it.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/06/nyregion/monitor-must-oversee-ny-fire-dept-hiring-judge-rules.html
 
Are those laws still in place?

Do you have anything relevant to the 21st century? Or are you still living in the 1700s?

And it has what to do with the CURRENT "racist" test?

There were no institutional fire departments in the US in the 1700s. Are you sure you don't mean the 1900s? Either case my statement was a simple one: Civil institutions have historically been used to racially discriminate. I've shown this to be true up until at least 50 years ago. Do you have any evidence to the contrary? No? Then go arrest a few black kids for smoking pot or something.
 
No... not when it comes to civil rights law........ Its all based on human emotion, especially in a district court with a judge's emotions reigning over the decision.

with that perception, and being a member of law enforcement, i hope your views are not shared by LEOs in my community
that emotion would prevail over fact in the federal courts is hogwash
your debate position has been extinguished and you are grasping for tiny, imagined straws
 

Then I think it is important when a judge's decision could be viewed as being based upon emotion that said decision be articulated.

We have little to no reason to believe that this case is not based on some emotion or some socio-political agenda.

As I still refuse to believe a test can somehow be racist.
 

Unless of course the tests are graded arbitrarily and the only ones who seem to statistically do badly on it are minorities. :roll: - You remind me of people who don't watch where they are going and wonder why they keep falling. There can't possibly be a pattern. It must be the sidewalk. :lol:
 
Last edited:
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…