• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

FDA will limit Covid vaccines to people over 65 or at high risk of serious illness, leaders say

NOLA Dude said:
If that's the case then point out what specifically isn't true. Should be easy to do right? Instead most of yall use mediabiasfactcheck to try to discredit something thinking what some random guy who made his own website says is the authority. Weak and very transparent.
Click to expand...
Challenge accepted.

Stem Cell Risks in Pregnancy
There is no credible scientific evidence that COVID-19 vaccines deplete stem cells in pregnant women. Studies confirm that vaccines do not harm fetal development and instead reduce complications from COVID-19 infection during pregnancy.
(CDC: COVID-19 Vaccination for Pregnant Women)
(Yale School of Medicine: COVID-19 Vaccines Not Linked to Miscarriage)

Monkey Virus SV40 Contamination
SV40 was historically present in polio vaccines between 1955-1961, but there is no evidence that COVID-19 vaccines contain SV40 or pose a cancer risk. Claims about SV40 in mRNA vaccines come from unverified studies that lack scientific credibility. Regulatory agencies confirm no SV40 contamination has been found in COVID-19 vaccines.
(FDA: Response on SV40 Concerns)
(European Medicines Agency: COVID-19 Vaccine Safety)

If you're citing sources, credible medical research and peer-reviewed studies should always be prioritized over conspiracy-driven speculation. If you have multiple, actual studies supporting your claims, feel free to share them.
 
NOLA Dude said:
That study was talking about depleting the stem cells. I posted 3 links above about SV40 in the covid vaccine.

These results indicate that SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination impair the functionalities and survivability of HSPCs in the UCB, which would make unprecedented concerns on the future of HSPC-based therapies.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Skewed fate and hematopoiesis of CD34+ HSPCs in umbilical cord blood amid the COVID-19 pandemic - PubMed

Umbilical cord blood (UCB) is an irreplaceable source for hematopoietic stem progenitor cells (HSPCs). However, the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination on UCB phenotype, specifically the HSPCs therein, are currently unknown. We thus evaluated any effects of SARS-CoV-2...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Because you seem incapable of understanding that part or you are just ignoring it I'll put it in simple terms:

The study shows that covid infection or vaccine can harm the stem cells found in a newborn’s umbilical cord blood which is catastrophic.
Click to expand...
How many times do you have to be proven wrong?

Courtesy of @Xilnik

FDA will limit Covid vaccines to people over 65 or at high risk of serious illness, leaders say

If that's the case then point out what specifically isn't true. Should be easy to do right? Instead most of yall use mediabiasfactcheck to try to discredit something thinking what some random guy who made his own website says is the authority. Weak and very transparent. Challenge accepted...
debatepolitics.com debatepolitics.com
 
Xilnik said:
Challenge accepted.

Stem Cell Risks in Pregnancy
There is no credible scientific evidence that COVID-19 vaccines deplete stem cells in pregnant women. Studies confirm that vaccines do not harm fetal development and instead reduce complications from COVID-19 infection during pregnancy.
(CDC: COVID-19 Vaccination for Pregnant Women)
(Yale School of Medicine: COVID-19 Vaccines Not Linked to Miscarriage)

Monkey Virus SV40 Contamination
SV40 was historically present in polio vaccines between 1955-1961, but there is no evidence that COVID-19 vaccines contain SV40 or pose a cancer risk. Claims about SV40 in mRNA vaccines come from unverified studies that lack scientific credibility. Regulatory agencies confirm no SV40 contamination has been found in COVID-19 vaccines.
(FDA: Response on SV40 Concerns)
(European Medicines Agency: COVID-19 Vaccine Safety)

If you're citing sources, credible medical research and peer-reviewed studies should always be prioritized over conspiracy-driven speculation. If you have multiple, actual studies supporting your claims, feel free to share them.
Click to expand...
I posted studies showing the opposite. Sounds like we need more data to confirm either way right?
 
NOLA Dude said:
In shift away from universal access, new studies of Covid boosters will be required for people under 65

The Food and Drug Administration announced Tuesday that it will limit access to Covid-19 vaccines going forward to people 65 years of age and older and others who are at high risk of becoming seriously ill if they are infected, and will require manufacturers to conduct clinical trials to show whether the vaccines are of benefit to healthy younger adults and children.

After weeks of signaling a shift in thinking, the new leaders of the FDA and the agency’s division that regulates vaccines published a commentary in the New England Journal of Medicine laying out their plan for future use of Covid vaccines.
www.statnews.com

FDA will limit Covid vaccines to people over 65 or at high risk of serious illness, leaders say

The FDA announced it will limit access to Covid-19 vaccines going forward to people 65 and older and others at high risk of serious illness
www.statnews.com www.statnews.com


This is how the vaccine was originally intended as Deborah Birx admitted recently. The young and healthy people don't need the covid vaccine especially now that it’s much less severe than when it first came out of the Wuhan lab. MAHA!
Click to expand...
Wrong again. The young and healthy were less likely to die overall but still many times more likely if they were not vaccinated:

IMG_0336.webp
 
coyote505 said:
I suspect it will be available to those who pay for it out of their own pockets.
Click to expand...
The article says it will not be available.

And here you are defending it. Will you also defend it when Brain Worm goes after polio vaccines?
 
NOLA Dude said:
In shift away from universal access, new studies of Covid boosters will be required for people under 65

The Food and Drug Administration announced Tuesday that it will limit access to Covid-19 vaccines going forward to people 65 years of age and older and others who are at high risk of becoming seriously ill if they are infected, and will require manufacturers to conduct clinical trials to show whether the vaccines are of benefit to healthy younger adults and children.

After weeks of signaling a shift in thinking, the new leaders of the FDA and the agency’s division that regulates vaccines published a commentary in the New England Journal of Medicine laying out their plan for future use of Covid vaccines.
www.statnews.com

FDA will limit Covid vaccines to people over 65 or at high risk of serious illness, leaders say

The FDA announced it will limit access to Covid-19 vaccines going forward to people 65 and older and others at high risk of serious illness
www.statnews.com www.statnews.com


This is how the vaccine was originally intended as Deborah Birx admitted recently. The young and healthy people don't need the covid vaccine especially now that its much less severe than when it first came out of the Wuhan lab. MAHA!
Click to expand...
Is it a requirement that if you want to join the Trump administration you must be a lying scumbag just like the boss? RFK jr, 11/6/2025:

www.politico.eu

RFK Jr: ‘We’re not gonna take vaccines away from anybody’

The former Democrat-turned-Trump-ally gave more details on the role the president-elect envisions for him.
www.politico.eu www.politico.eu
 
Last edited:
RaleBulgarian said:
Many, many actual Republicans/conservatives and Independents, including myself, use “MAGAt” as shorthand for identifying members of Traitor Trump’s cult base of anti-Constitution/American shitheads.

No reason that should bother you, right?
Click to expand...
Stupidity and childishness always bother me.
 
NOLA Dude said:
I posted studies showing the opposite. Sounds like we need more data to confirm either way right?
Click to expand...
Did you request more data? Here are several more peer-reviewed studies:

Additional studies confirm that COVID-19 vaccines do not increase miscarriage risk and are safe for pregnant individuals.
(BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth: Systematic Review)
(Springer: Safety and Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines During Pregnancy)
(BMJ Global Health: Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes)

Claims about SV40 contamination rely on studies of unknown provenance that lack scientific credibility.
(Science Feedback: SV40 and DNA Contamination Claims)

Remember, if you're citing sources, peer-reviewed medical research should always be prioritized over speculation.
 
NOLA Dude said:
I posted studies showing the opposite. Sounds like we need more data to confirm either way right?
Click to expand...
There is no valid peer approved study that show covid vaccines effect stem cells in any way shape or form. Covid may though.... yet another reason to be vaccinated. Again get real. You'll like it.
 
Another reason they shouldn't get it

 
George50 said:
Is it a requirement that if you want to join the Trump administration you must be a lying scumbag just like the boss? RFK jr, 11/6/2025:

www.politico.eu

RFK Jr: ‘We’re not gonna take vaccines away from anybody’

The former Democrat-turned-Trump-ally gave more details on the role the president-elect envisions for him.
www.politico.eu www.politico.eu
Click to expand...
He's not taking vaccines away. He's requiring new studies to show they are safe and effective which every medication requires. Once they complete those studies then the other groups can get it.
 
NOLA Dude said:
He's not taking vaccines away. He's requiring new studies to show they are safe and effective which every medication requires. Once they complete those studies then the other groups can get it.
Click to expand...

He's not taking it away, but making it unavailable.

Hello Orwell!
 
Well, well, well. Should we be surprised?



A top Food and Drug Administration (FDA) official said on May 15 that she never took a COVID-19 vaccine due to concerns about biodistribution.

Dr. Sara Brenner, the FDA’s principal deputy commissioner, said during an event in Washington that she did not receive any of the COVID-19 vaccines.

Brenner said that she was pregnant during the COVID-19 pandemic.

“It was unknown at the time what the biodistribution patterns of those products were, and in my case, in particular, what the excretion would be in breast milk,” Brenner said. “That was my primary concern, and that exposure I was very concerned about.”

When asked whether the information that has emerged since then validates her choice, Brenner, who said she was not speaking on behalf of the FDA, said she thinks it does.

Researchers reported in a 2022 paper that messenger ribonucleic acid, which is in the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 shots, was detected in human breast milk. Another paper, in 2023, detailed similar findings.
 
j brown's body said:
He's not taking it away, but making it unavailable.

Hello Orwell!
Click to expand...
False. He's requiring studies to show they are safe and effective. Every other medication requires it. Does that mean the FDA has been making medications unavailable?
 
NOLA Dude said:
False. He's requiring studies to show they are safe and effective. Every other medication requires it. Does that mean the FDA has been making medications unavailable?
Click to expand...

He is still taking it away. When he isn't taking it away, we can say he's not taking it away.
 
NOLA Dude said:
In shift away from universal access, new studies of Covid boosters will be required for people under 65

The Food and Drug Administration announced Tuesday that it will limit access to Covid-19 vaccines going forward to people 65 years of age and older and others who are at high risk of becoming seriously ill if they are infected, and will require manufacturers to conduct clinical trials to show whether the vaccines are of benefit to healthy younger adults and children.

After weeks of signaling a shift in thinking, the new leaders of the FDA and the agency’s division that regulates vaccines published a commentary in the New England Journal of Medicine laying out their plan for future use of Covid vaccines.
www.statnews.com

FDA will limit Covid vaccines to people over 65 or at high risk of serious illness, leaders say

The FDA announced it will limit access to Covid-19 vaccines going forward to people 65 and older and others at high risk of serious illness
www.statnews.com www.statnews.com


This is how the vaccine was originally intended as Deborah Birx admitted recently. The young and healthy people don't need the covid vaccine especially now that its much less severe than when it first came out of the Wuhan lab. MAHA!
Click to expand...

So you admit that the vaccine is effect and still want to limit its use.

Why?
 
NOLA Dude said:
He's not taking vaccines away. He's requiring new studies to show they are safe and effective which every medication requires. Once they complete those studies then the other groups can get it.
Click to expand...
So he doesn’t care about the 65+ age group if these vaccines are so dangerous?

Weird.
 
NOLA Dude said:
Peer reviewed? Hmmm

undark.org

I Published a Fake Paper in a ‘Peer-Reviewed’ Journal

Opinion | A dubious education journal invited me to submit a manuscript that would undergo "rigorous" review. It was far too easy.
undark.org undark.org

Click to expand...

Your argument stems from a predatory journal. Predatory journals publish low-quality or fake papers without proper peer review, misleading researchers and the public.
(National Library of Medicine: How to Identify Predatory Journals)
(Nature: The Global Threat of Predatory Journals)

Legitimate peer-reviewed journals require editorial oversight, independent reviewers, and rejection of flawed studies. Before citing research, check if it’s from recognized sources, such as:
A single questionable paper does not override multiple well-conducted studies from credible sources. If a claim relies on low-quality or predatory sources, it should be viewed critically, not as definitive evidence.

Do you have studies from recognized, reputable journals? If not, you may be repeating misinformation rather than legitimate scientific debate.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom