• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

FBI to Investigate Trump Related to Assassination Attempt

Juks said:
Actually, if that were ever to happen (which I highly doubt), it would be a great media campaign for Trump, and the other cases against him would lose the momentum they deserve.
Click to expand...
It would not be. In the US we have roughly 90% of the media that are propagandists for the Democrat party. If you remember TASS, Pravda and Izvestia from the Soviet era that is EXACTLY what most of the US media is today.
 
Lutherf said:
It would not be. In the US we have roughly 90% of the media that are propagandists for the Democrat party. If you remember TASS, Pravda and Izvestia from the Soviet era that is EXACTLY what most of the US media is today.
Click to expand...
There is no honesty in this statement.

www.pewresearch.org

2. Americans are divided by party in the sources they turn to for political news

To a large degree, the pattern of partisan polarization that emerges in attitudes about the credibility of news sources is also evident in the sources
www.pewresearch.org www.pewresearch.org
 
Lutherf said:
It would not be. In the US we have roughly 90% of the media that are propagandists for the Democrat party. If you remember TASS, Pravda and Izvestia from the Soviet era that is EXACTLY what most of the US media is today.
Click to expand...
That is what Trump and his entourage have made you believe. There is a reason for that, just so you know.
 
Juks said:
That is what Trump and his entourage have made you believe. There is a reason for that, just so you know.
Click to expand...
Really? What percentage of the US media told the whole world that Joe Biden was perfectly fine, mentally, and that FOX News was making shit up about him before the debate? If that's not proof of the propaganda mission of 90% of the US media then nothing is.
 
Superfly said:
Where’s the wound?

View attachment 67523008
Click to expand...
You're right. The whole "assassination attempt" thing was totally made up. It never happened. Trump was never injured and nobody was killed or injured. It was all a conspiracy by FOX to lead their followers astray and the FBI, with Wray's testimony before congress, proved that. :rolleyes:
 
Lutherf said:
The FBI isn't trying to "investigate" anything. Based on Wray's testimony before congress he CLEARLY indicated that the "assassination attempt" is mere projection that hasn't been proved and, as such, is a likely conspiracy to influence the voting public.
Click to expand...

Do you have evidence of Wray saying this? I only know he has questioned whether it was a bullet or shrapnel that hit Trump's ear, but that doesn't mean he believes it was a false flag/inside job.
 
ClaraD said:
I am believing the shrapnel part...damage from a .223 would be massive....take his ear off massive.. No one is saying there wasn't an attempt on his life (there are some CT's out there that think he set the whole thing up, but I am not talking about those folks...even they aren't saying it didn't happen.)
Click to expand...

Something I was wondering was how long hydrostatic shockwaves would come into play. What distance before it was no longer relevant. Don’t know the formula to figure that out.
 
ClaraD said:
shrapnel can cause more damage than 2 centimeters....and the damage from a .223 would be more than 2 centimeters
Click to expand...

Even if it was 2 cm, that’s close to an inch. There is no damage on the top of his ear that’s even close to that.
 
Lutherf said:
See, that's your problem. You really have no idea how ballistic damage to a thin flap of soft tissue works, you speculate based on horror stories (exaggerated ones) you've heard about how a 5.56 round blows babies up, and now believe that the round would have taken Trump's ear off. That's just wrong but you're going to believe it anyway because it's what you want to believe and it makes you feel good about yourself.

The "it would have ripped his ear off" theories and the "shrapnel" are ridiculous. Shrapnel would have required the projectile to hit a hard object. We have seen ZERO evidence that anything other than people got hit and we saw the ****ing incident! It wasn't shrapnel and Wray only said that because he's trying to feed the masses a narrative that turns them from Trump. It was a political hit by Wray.
Click to expand...

So where’s the damage that a 5.56m round would do at 2,500 fps?

IMG_6809.webp
 
Lutherf said:
https://www.newsweek.com/fbi-wants-...g-injury-assassination-attempt-report-1930517


Bottom line, based on the Wray testimony before congress and this report it appears that the FBI believes Trump made the whole thing up and is now investigating him for falsification of injuries and election interference.
Click to expand...
Uh...No.

It appears the FBI wants to interview the presidential candidate who was the apparent target of an assassination attempt.
This is not unusual or odd or in any way questionable.

It is literally their job.
 
Lutherf said:
Y'know, we learn the hyperbole thing at a very young age. It's a mechanism to get attention. Kids do it so they get a kiss on the boo-boo or a smiley face on a band-aid. Adults do it because it gets then sympathy.
Click to expand...

And votes.
 
Lutherf said:
I sure hope he keeps his mouth shut and lets his lawyers do the talking.
Click to expand...

Ikari said:
Why? Does he have something to hide? He's the victim in this case, there shouldn't be anything he can say that would put any amount of culpability on him. Weird that you'd think there's something Trump could say about the assassination attempt that would come against him.
Click to expand...

Lutherf said:
One wrong word, one embellishment, one omission and the FBI will hit him with a felony. It's the only way to save democracy and that's what the FBI has been all about when it comes to Trump since the summer of 2016.
Click to expand...

Ikari said:
A felony for what? He is the victim, there's nothing he can say in this case that would make him a criminal. It's weird that you think it's possible that he's done something here that would be criminal if found out.
Click to expand...

 
Lutherf said:
The director of the FBI already came out at a House hearing on the matter and stated that there is no evidence that Trump was shot by a bullet. He said that SPECIFICALLY to discredit the "assassination attempt" narrative.
Click to expand...
The head of the FBI plants the seeds in congressional testimony, and some still think the FBI management haven't been politicized?
Seriously?
 
Lutherf said:
You're right. The whole "assassination attempt" thing was totally made up. It never happened. Trump was never injured and nobody was killed or injured. It was all a conspiracy by FOX to lead their followers astray and the FBI, with Wray's testimony before congress, proved that. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

I didn’t ask for your whiny, cry-baby assed victimization post. I’ve seen enough of those to do me for the rest of my life.

I asked you to show me on the image I posted where the wound is. Can you show me?
 
Lutherf said:
You're right. The whole "assassination attempt" thing was totally made up. It never happened. Trump was never injured and nobody was killed or injured. It was all a conspiracy by FOX to lead their followers astray and the FBI, with Wray's testimony before congress, proved that. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Two things can be true at once:

1. There was an assassination attempt on Trump

2. Trump has exploited this event to his advantage as narcissists are wont to do.
 
eohrnberger said:
The head of the FBI plants the seeds in congressional testimony, and some still think the FBI management haven't been politicized?
Seriously?
Click to expand...

The ones planting seeds of doubt are Trump and his team as they remain secretive about his medical report.

If half of his ear was taken off (as his son claimed) then he'd be showing that shit off all over social media.
 
Geoist said:
Two things can be true at once:

1. There was an assassination attempt on Trump

2. Trump has exploited this event to his advantage as narcissists are wont to do.
Click to expand...
Trump will attempt to exploit, grift, or leverage every situation, to teh greatest extent he possibly can, legal or not. That is utterly predictable, much like the sunrise.
 
Superfly said:
I didn’t ask for your whiny, cry-baby assed victimization post. I’ve seen enough of those to do me for the rest of my life.

I asked you to show me on the image I posted where the wound is. Can you show me?
Click to expand...
What? You posted some random picture of Trump with no indication of the source, when it was taken, where it was taken or anything else and you want me to comment on it? What am I supposed to comment on? Yeah, it looks like a picture of Trump.
 
BabaVoss said:
Trump will attempt to exploit, grift, or leverage every situation, to teh greatest extent he possibly can, legal or not. That is utterly predictable, much like the sunrise.
Click to expand...
This nothing more than classic projection, which is in and of itself is already a confession.
 
“Trump will attempt to exploit, grift, or leverage every situation, to teh greatest extent he possibly can, legal or not. That is utterly predictable, much like the sunrise.”
eohrnberger said:
This nothing more than classic projection, which is in and of itself is already a confession.
Click to expand...
LOL. No, it is a matter of well-documented history. Donald has ALWAYS been a scammer and a grifter. Everything in his life is transactional. It’s no secret.
 
BabaVoss said:
“Trump will attempt to exploit, grift, or leverage every situation, to teh greatest extent he possibly can, legal or not. That is utterly predictable, much like the sunrise.”

LOL. No, it is a matter of well-documented history. Donald has ALWAYS been a scammer and a grifter. Everything in his life is transactional. It’s no secret.
Click to expand...
It is a well known and well demonstrated core value of the left is "Politics Uber Alles", as are:
  • "Never let a crisis go to waste" (for political advantage)
  • "By any means necessary" (for political advantage)
  • "The ends justifies the means" (for political advantage
You constant pointing at Trump when confronted with this reality of the left is nothing but diversion, yelling 'Squirrel!'
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom