• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

FBI Report on Kavanaugh

Sadly, I think this report will be window-dressing and nothing more.

Because there was nothing more to investigate.

But you wanted it. You got it.

Let's vote.
 
Control leaks. It'll be interesting...
What's that saying about how 2 people can keep a secret?
I do not think they are trying to keep senators from saying what they saw in the report,
but rather keep them from leaking a copy of the report.
 
Because there was nothing more to investigate.

But you wanted it. You got it.

Let's vote.

If he had had 6 background checks already, the scope of # 7 would not be that broad.
They interviewed Judge, and a few other who were supposedly present, but who had already said they were not.
Since there was no firm date given, no firm location given, ect, it kind of limits the scope of the questions they can ask.
 
wanna find a witch-just look to the asshole who started this whole charade-the senior slime bag from California

True. DiFi knowingly created this mess.

Why Ford? Again an easy trail to follow. Ford went to school in the same general location as Kavanaugh and around the same time.

Ford is an activist in DiFi's district. Also a professor at Palo Alto.

DiFi's husband is Blum. Blum is director of Board of Regents at Palo Alto. Blum is Ford's boss.

All just coincidence.
 
If he had had 6 background checks already, the scope of # 7 would not be that broad.
They interviewed Judge, and a few other who were supposedly present, but who had already said they were not.
Since there was no firm date given, no firm location given, ect, it kind of limits the scope of the questions they can ask.

Add to that the fact that Grassley gave Ford all the time she needed to say anything she wanted before the hearing started.

Nothing to see here folks.
 
Because there was nothing more to investigate.

If that is what you want to believe then believe it. Several friends and associates had information to share and they were never interviewed.
 
If that is what you want to believe then believe it. Several friends and associates had information to share and they were never interviewed.
Related to Ford's testimony?
 
If that is what you want to believe then believe it. Several friends and associates had information to share and they were never interviewed.

If several friends had something to say, they've had ample time to say it. If they felt they were not being heard, there's always MSM.

It's done. It's over. You got your 7th investigation. Time to move on. There will be a new cause next week.
 
Related to Kavanaugh's character and his testimony.
That is not what they were investigating, they were investigating weather they could find any
collaboration to Ford's accusations.
 
If several friends had something to say, they've had ample time to say it. If they felt they were not being heard, there's always MSM.

Some have done that.

It's done. It's over. You got your 7th investigation. Time to move on. There will be a new cause next week.

It wasn't an investigation. It was window-dressing. None of the public gets to see this so-called report.
 
Some have done that.



It wasn't an investigation. It was window-dressing. None of the public gets to see this so-called report.

Then the FBI already knew what they had to say.

Of course it was window dressing. The left demanded, the left got. There was nothing new to report.
 
How many Israeli agents were compromised by Trump's loose lips? 2, if I remember right. I wonder when foreign governments will start to trust him with secrets again.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump's_disclosures_of_classified_information

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/333670-israeli-intelligence-boiling-mad-at-trump-report

Israel did not confirm or deny the report but released a statement stating full confidence in the intelligence sharing relationships with the United States.

Looks like there is no problem according to your link.


an Israeli online news site, reported on January 12 that U.S. intelligence advised Israeli intelligence officers to be cautious about sharing information with the incoming Trump administration, until the possibility of Russian influence over Trump, suggested by Christopher Steele's report (commonly referred as the Trump–Russia dossier), has been fully investigated.


It does look like our intelligence under Obama is undermining the new president.
 
wanna find a witch-just look to the asshole who started this whole charade-the senior slime bag from California

It is a shame. I used to be a democrat back when their motto was "ask not what your country can do for you — ask what you can do for your country" That party no longer exist. They have sunk so low I hate to even let people know I still consider voting for their candidates.
 
They said the report would be presented to Senators in capital SCIF, no phones, no cameras, no recording devices, are allowed in.

Yes. Americans aren't allowed to know anything.

What a farce.
 
Oh damn...I sure HOPE they arent stupid enough to try to pin an argument based on teenage substance use....

View attachment 67241568

Here's the ****ing difference, Obama was upfront about his behavior (your quote is from his ****ing AUTOBIOGRAPHY) while Kavanaugh try to make himself out like some kind of choir boy. Oh, and multiple people haven't come forward accusing Barack Obama of sexual assault in confluence with drunken behavior.

Democrats aren't calling out Kavanaugh because he spent his high school and college years in a drunken stupor. They're calling him out because he's such an obvious serial liar on top of being a partisan hack. He's not fit to serve on the Supreme Court, and he's arguably probably not even fit to serve in his current position if rational people were to be the judges, but Republicans are the party of Trump and his sycophants so they'll vote for him anyway.
 
Democrats aren't calling out Kavanaugh because he spent his high school and college years in a drunken stupor. They're calling him out because he's such an obvious serial liar on top of being a partisan hack.

Exactly. Kavanaugh perjured himself under oath.

I'd go to prison if I lied under oath. This liar goes to the SCOTUS bench.
 
Here's the ****ing difference, Obama was upfront about his behavior (your quote is from his ****ing AUTOBIOGRAPHY) while Kavanaugh try to make himself out like some kind of choir boy. Oh, and multiple people haven't come forward accusing Barack Obama of sexual assault in confluence with drunken behavior.

Democrats aren't calling out Kavanaugh because he spent his high school and college years in a drunken stupor. They're calling him out because he's such an obvious serial liar on top of being a partisan hack. He's not fit to serve on the Supreme Court, and he's arguably probably not even fit to serve in his current position if rational people were to be the judges, but Republicans are the party of Trump and his sycophants so they'll vote for him anyway.
I dont recall Kavanaugh ever claiming he didnt drink and so far, his accusers are a woman that cant remember anything about ANYTHING, another woman that claims she didnt remember anything about who did what for decades but NOW she is sure its Kavanaugh that showed her his penis, a THIRD accuser that has showed herself to be a total ****ing liar, a FOURTH accuser tht SAW the rape AND beat the **** out of Kavanaugh...except...it turns out HE too was full of **** and a liar, a FIFTH accuser that said she had a daughter that knew someone that had a friend that swore she saw Kavanaugh push this one girl up against a wall........


yeah man...thats a ****in ROCK STAR lineup of 'accusers'.
 
well given Ford

couldn't name ANYONE who remembers being there
Couldn't name when it happened, or where it happened
Ramirez keeps demonstrating she really had no clue
and Swetnick's crawfishing over her laughable claims

what else could the FBI do

try to judge what amount of drinking matters given there isn't a single police report indicating that Kavanaugh

1) was arrested for assault
2) was arrested for DUI
3) was arrested for Drunk and disorderly
4) arrested for drinking in public or while underage

doesn't sound like they could add much

The game is over. Brett Kavanaugh will be nominated. Democrats must accept defeat.
 
well given Ford

couldn't name ANYONE who remembers being there
Couldn't name when it happened, or where it happened
Ramirez keeps demonstrating she really had no clue
and Swetnick's crawfishing over her laughable claims

what else could the FBI do

try to judge what amount of drinking matters given there isn't a single police report indicating that Kavanaugh

1) was arrested for assault
2) was arrested for DUI
3) was arrested for Drunk and disorderly
4) arrested for drinking in public or while underage

doesn't sound like they could add much

She couldnt' even tell the same story. Was it 4 boys or 2?
 
Despite how restricted they made the investigation, Republicans still don't want the report getting leaked. The shadiness of this whole process is unreal.

If that is true, Senator Spartacus will come through for you, and leak it.


If this report contains, in fact, anything that would credibly back Ford's claims, it will come out.
 
Here's the ****ing difference, Obama was upfront about his behavior (your quote is from his ****ing AUTOBIOGRAPHY) while Kavanaugh try to make himself out like some kind of choir boy.

This is one of the dumbest talking points to have come out; hilariously, it is sometimes disproven in the very article claiming it.


Kavanaugh: "Sometimes I drank to excess."
Kavanaugh's Roomate: "He drank to excess."
Democrats: OMG HE TOTES CLAIMED TO BE A CHOIR BOY AND IT TURNED OUT HE LIED ABOUT NOT DRINKING TO EXCESS, HERE NOW WE WILL QUOTE HIM STATING THAT HE DRANK TO EXCESS IN ORDER TO PROVE THAT HE CLAIMED HE DIDN'T!!!!!.


:roll:


Oh, and multiple people haven't come forward accusing Barack Obama of sexual assault in confluence with drunken behavior.

Lots of people accused Barack Obama of lots of things. I don't recall you putting aside your ability to think rationally to give uncredible claims weight.

Democrats aren't calling out Kavanaugh because he spent his high school and college years in a drunken stupor. They're calling him out because he's such an obvious serial liar

Sure. If you first claim he said things he didn't, and then prove that the things he didn't say were wrong, he's a liar. Congrats.

on top of being a partisan hack. He's not fit to serve on the Supreme Court, and he's arguably probably not even fit to serve in his current position if rational people were to be the judges, but Republicans are the party of Trump and his sycophants so they'll vote for him anyway.

I was the first person on this board to point out that Trump had fascistic tendencies, back when the left was still writing articles about how he'd actually be better than Cruz, or Rubio, or any of those icky conservatives. I opposed Trump for a year and a half, and I opposed Moore when he came up, and the evidence was against him, too.


I'm no Trump sycophant. You're just wrong, sucked in by tribalism; as wrong as any of the Trump defenders who insisted he was a good person, for the same, tribal, reason.
 
It is a shame. I used to be a democrat back when their motto was "ask not what your country can do for you — ask what you can do for your country" That party no longer exist. They have sunk so low I hate to even let people know I still consider voting for their candidates.

Well, your disappointment in them means you are a rapist.
 
Back
Top Bottom