• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

FBI: Men tried to buy bombs for government attack

Somerville

DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 29, 2012
Messages
17,873
Reaction score
8,364
Location
On an island. Not that one!
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Socialist
Remember all the outrage in 2009, when DHS put out a report about the increasing danger of right wing terrorism?

 
Hasn't there been sniper attacks on power stations recently?
 
Remember all the outrage in 2009, when DHS put out a report about the increasing danger of right wing terrorism?




According to the article at the link, "The three men participated in online discussions about carrying out an operation against the government in February," and "The online chats were monitored by the FBI."

:lamo




Smart guys, eh?
 
Remember all the outrage in 2009, when DHS put out a report about the increasing danger of right wing terrorism?
So you had to wait 5 years for a couple of crackpots to do something stupid to prove that there is really a "threat" out there? Pretty unconvincing.
 
According to the article at the link, "The three men participated in online discussions about carrying out an operation against the government in February," and "The online chats were monitored by the FBI."

:lamo




Smart guys, eh?

Where are these people chatting at, I can't find them.
 
Remember all the outrage in 2009, when DHS put out a report about the increasing danger of right wing terrorism?

Total bloody idiots.

First, you make bombs, you don't buy them.
Second, you do not attack innocents.
Third, Obama and the Dems are not the government, they are a political party. If your views are right-wing and you actually want to see changes, you don't attack "the government", you attack leftist.

It's exactly these kinds of nuts that make it essential that someone with a working brain gets in contact with them and gives them some useful guidance.

As the country continues to become more and more divided over political issues, violence will occur. Someone needs to exert control over and focus that violence, not allow a bunch of random nuts to do stupid things. For now, the FBI has been lucky and were able to catch these nuts before something happened, but if we keep growing the number of nuts, sooner or later, the FBI will fail.

I'm all for eliminating leftist, but not at the cost of dead kids.
 
So you're the type of folk they were referring to in the DHS report. Good to know we've got eyes on ya.
 
So you had to wait 5 years for a couple of crackpots to do something stupid to prove that there is really a "threat" out there? Pretty unconvincing.

Maybe you should be reading something more than your favourite blogs


also, from the "librul' Combating Terrorism Center at West Point
 

What if those kids grow up to be Democrats?

You sound like that Brevik guy.
 
So you had to wait 5 years for a couple of crackpots to do something stupid to prove that there is really a "threat" out there?

The existence of and potential threat posed by separatist militias was well documented before this incident.

Pretty unconvincing.

The FBI generally has a better grasp on chatter trends and plots than does the average citizen. I'll take their word for it.
 

Can you tell us who you think it's acceptable to murder? More specifically than "leftists," I mean. We already know you are in favor of murdering "leftists." I'm just wanting to know more.
 
Can you tell us who you think it's acceptable to murder? More specifically than "leftists," I mean. We already know you are in favor of murdering "leftists." I'm just wanting to know more.

War, even revolution, is not murder.
 
Can you tell us who you think it's acceptable to murder? More specifically than "leftists," I mean. We already know you are in favor of murdering "leftists." I'm just wanting to know more.

I personally don't have a "target" list, as I have no plans to start a revolution nor to kill anyone at this time.
 
Remember all the outrage in 2009, when DHS put out a report about the increasing danger of right wing terrorism?

Exactly what identifies "right Wing" terrorism?

It could easily be the Tolerant Left protesting perceived intolerance, with expressive violence, ala SDS and/or Weather Underground etal.

Just wonderin'

Thom Paine
 

War, even revolution, is not murder.

I personally don't have a "target" list, as I have no plans to start a revolution nor to kill anyone at this time.

 
So you had to wait 5 years for a couple of crackpots to do something stupid to prove that there is really a "threat" out there? Pretty unconvincing.

Righ-wingers waited until legislation was proposed in lieu of the Newtown school shootings to say "aha we told you Obama was coming after our guns". What's the problem? A broken clock is right twice a day. If you spout enough non-sense eventually a false accusation may prove to be correct by coincedence.
 
The existence of and potential threat posed by separatist militias was well documented before this incident.



The FBI generally has a better grasp on chatter trends and plots than does the average citizen. I'll take their word for it.

You would think so, right? Here's something I learned when I got my BS in computer science - the FBI pays their IT folks virtually nothing, analysts included. The private sector pays three times what the feebs do for the same job, the NSA five times what the feebs pay. Where are the best folks going to work? That's right, everywhere but the FBI.
 

Well, that's big government though. You can't have it both ways.
 
You sound like that Brevik guy.

Can one person make a difference to the path that a society takes? Those people that Brevik murdered were all deeply committed socialists intent on furthering the destruction of his society. The reports indicated that there were quite a number of talented youths at that camp.

If people really are cogs and all of us are easily replaceable, then Brevik's crime would have no impact beyond the personal tragedies he inflicted. However, if individuals of talent cannot be easily replaced, then Brevik very likely altered the path that Norway is now following and will follow in the future, for those youth leaders won't be around to lead and their substitutes won't be as effective or as charismatic or as influential.

Brevik thought he was at war. Was his crime an effective strike at his enemy or wasn't it?
 

So being a delusional mass murderer is OK as long as you attack "the left?"
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…