• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Fauci lied, bats died. Caught in the lie again.

seymourflops

seymourflops

Keep Calm and Rebuy!
Banned
Supporting Member
Monthly Donator
Joined
Aug 22, 2021
Messages
3,753
Reaction score
888
Location
Texas
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian
Fledermaus said:
Watch the dishonestly truncated video?

Why?

We already know the dishonestly truncated video is used to dishonestly accuse Fauci of lying.

Why do you insist on dishonesty?
Click to expand...
Post the full video then and explain how it changes what Fauci says in the first part.
 
All these comments and no one has had time to read the story yet.
 
I don't know about everyone else but it's pretty obvious that a bunch of America is trying to keep the conversation off of the unvaccinated because they're watching them die. They need other scapegoats.
 
CaughtInThe said:
I don't know about everyone else but it's pretty obvious that a bunch of America is trying to keep the conversation off of the unvaccinated because they're watching them die. They need other scapegoats.
Click to expand...
Stupid is as stupid does.
 
bubbabgone said:
Yeah I saw this on a couple other outlets.
It does appear the Fauch has some 'splainin' to do.
Click to expand...
If I recall, Fauci was instrumental in writing in the loop hole in Obama's viral 'gain of function' research funding ban which allowed US funding to continue to the Chinese Military Wuhan bio-weapons lab.
 
I will pretend for a moment that all this is true...

So, to be clear, Right Wingers are desperately trying to convince the public that this is not a China Virus but Trump Virus after all?

According to the article, under Trump, we not only allowed for this funding to continue but also renewed it all the way through April 2020!
 
seymourflops said:

Internal Documents Further Contradict Fauci’s ‘Gain-of-Function’ Research Denials

New documents appear to contradict Anthony Fauci's claims that the NIH did not fund gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
news-yahoo-com.cdn.ampproject.org news-yahoo-com.cdn.ampproject.org

Read it and weep, Fauci Fangirls!
Click to expand...




QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

Overall, we rate Project Veritas Right Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of misleading videos and several failed fact checks.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA (45/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: MediumTraffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

History
Founded in 2010, Project Veritas was created by James Edward O’Keefe III, an American conservative political activist. He produces secretly recorded undercover audio and video encounters, some selectively edited to imply its subjects said things they did not, with figures and workers in academic, governmental, and social service organizations, purporting to show abusive or allegedly illegal behavior by employees and/or representatives of those organizations. Project Veritas primarily targets liberals and liberal organizations.

[snip]

On April 7th Mr. Sullivan wrote back, “Thank you for deleting the hyperlink to Politifact’s article. It is greatly appreciated.” He also provided hyperlinks demonstrating that Project Veritas checks Republicans. We felt that was good information and added it to the analysis section below. Finally, on April 9th, after making the changes, Mr. Sullivan wrote, “I appreciate your indulging these requests which, in the end, seek the same goal as your website – to fact check. Your objectivity here is refreshing, and, once again, it is very much appreciated.”

We have not made any changes to this source page since that date. We find it ironic that doing the right thing and correcting mistakes is considered a badge a shame. Perhaps to Project Veritas, striving to be factual is not important, but to us, it is. We are not ashamed at all and proud of our record of correcting mistakes and errors. That is what credible sources do.

Read our profile on the United States government and media.

Funded by / Ownership
James O’Keefe owns project Veritas. Funding primarily comes from donations. However, most of these donations come from the Donor’s Trust. The purpose of the Donor’s Trust Fund is to “safeguard the intent of libertarian and conservative donors.” In other words, it allows the source to receive funds without disclosing who they come from. Needless to say, most funding for Project Veritas comes from conservative and libertarian organizations.



Fauci lied, bats died. Caught in the lie again.

https://news-yahoo-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/news.yahoo.com/amphtml/internal-documents-further-contradict-fauci-142902303.html?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQKKAFQArABIIACAw%3D%3D#aoh=16310401001319&csi=1&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fnews...
debatepolitics.com debatepolitics.com




amp project is a fake news website.


Why would you believe a fake news website?



.
 
Slavister said:
I will pretend for a moment that all this is true...

So, to be clear, Right Wingers are desperately trying to convince the public that this is not a China Virus but Trump Virus after all?

According to the article, under Trump, we not only allowed for this funding to continue but also renewed it all the way through April 2020!
Click to expand...
I don't know about Right wingers but Trump gets the president's share of the blame from me.

He should have fired that lying sack of shi-ite within days of taking office.
 
swing_voter said:
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

Overall, we rate Project Veritas Right Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of misleading videos and several failed fact checks.
Detailed Report
Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA (45/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: MediumTraffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

[snip]

amp project is a fake news website.


Why would you believe a fake news website?



.
Click to expand...
Why would you?

Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC) is a website founded in 2015 by editor Dave Van Zandt. The website has been described as an amateur effort to rate news media sources based on +factual accuracy and political bias.
Media Bias/Fact Check - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Alexandra Kitty, in a 2018 book on journalism, described MBFC as an apparent "amateur/civic outfit" and wrote that its founder's only qualification was a degree in communications.When Journalism was a Thing. Zero Books. p. 158.

The Columbia Journalism Review describes Media Bias/Fact Check as an amateur attempt at categorizing media bias and Van Zandt as an "armchair media analyst." The Poynter Institute notes, "Media Bias/Fact Check is a widely cited source for news stories and even studies about misinformation, despite the fact that its method is in no way scientific."
www.poynter.org

Here's what to expect from fact-checking in 2019 - Poynter

From person-to-person coaching and intensive hands-on seminars to interactive online courses and media reporting, Poynter helps journalists sharpen skills and elevate storytelling throughout their careers.
www.poynter.org www.poynter.org

Media Bias Fact Check is either inept and/or dishonest.
Siewert goes on to write that Just Facts is “a deceptive site because they do use facts, but not all the facts in order to mask their right Bias.” As proof of this, she cites two articles that take issue with the Stanford Law Review paper cited by Just Facts. Neither of these articles appeared in a journal, and one of them is from a publication “written and published entirely by Harvard undergraduates.” Siewert does not even attempt to prove whether the critiques have any factual or logical value.

Media Bias Fact Check: Incompetent or Dishonest? - Just Facts
“Media Bias Fact Check,” a media outlet that claims to be “dedicated to educating the public on media bias and deceptive news practices,” is either inept or dishonest.
www.justfactsdaily.com
 
The ant-Faucci bias is despicable.
 
Fledermaus said:
SOS

(Same Old Shit)
Click to expand...
Eh, yore becoming a pest, Fledermouse.

I put you on ignore for welching on your bet offer. Then I took you off to see if I was missing an intelligent debate.

Nah.

Back to ignore with you!
 
Indeed, the SOS about Fauci from the anti-vax right.

Get your vax if you can.
 
seymourflops said:
Eh, yore becoming a pest, Fledermouse.

I put you on ignore for welching on your bet offer. Then I took you off to see if I was missing an intelligent debate.

Nah.

Back to ignore with you!
Click to expand...


Courageously ignoring people citing your dishonesty.


Got it.
 
1631046730567.webp

Getting their polio vaccines in Omaha.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom