• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Fauci lied, bats died. Caught in the lie again.

Objectively, Fauci has lied, and the evidence in hand demonstrates it.

It doesn't matter whether Alex Jones says that or a goat herder from Kathmandu. The reason attributed to why those people might say that is subjective, but that reason doesn't change the veracity of the statement that Fauci lied.
What evidence? Something cheery-picked and out of context? Something like; 'That was a fantastic movie (except the acting was poor, the cinematography amateurish at best and it was far too long)'.
 
What evidence? Something cheery-picked and out of context? Something like; 'That was a fantastic movie (except the acting was poor, the cinematography amateurish at best and it was far too long)'.
Remember when Fauci declared evidence that NIAID provided funding for the Wuhan lab "preposterous"?. Start there.
 
Did you not read what I posted? There are apparently 900 pages of documentation. Have you read them all in order to reach your conclusion-or are you going to meekly accept what some source tells you without checking for yourself?
Did you not read what I asked you? Have you seen the Intercept article? Why not?
I asked because afterwards you may want to rethink the wisdom of your mission to salvage Fauci's reputation.
 
Objectively, Fauci has lied, and the evidence in hand demonstrates it.

It doesn't matter whether Alex Jones says that or a goat herder from Kathmandu. The reason attributed to why those people might say that is subjective, but that reason doesn't change the veracity of the statement that Fauci lied.
Is Dr. Ebright at Rutgers University a lying right wing zealot? If not I'd say Dr. Fauci appears to have lied about funding gain of function research before Congress.

Following the release of the documents, Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University, wrote on Twitter:

“The materials confirm the grants supported the construction—in Wuhan—of novel chimeric SARS-related coronaviruses that combined a spike gene from one coronavirus with genetic information from another coronavirus, and confirmed the resulting viruses could infect human cells.
“The documents make it clear that assertions by the NIH Director, Francis Collins, and the NIAID Director, Anthony Fauci, that the NIH did not support gain-of-function research or potential pandemic pathogen enhancement at WIV are untruthful.” Dr. Ebright

So looks like Fauci lied and a lot of people died so perhaps it is time for him to go. BTW - I thought the Obama Administration stopped this type of gain of function research and yet it continued. If true it would appear top Federal bureaucrats are not concerned about violating orders. That too seems a concern to me.
I'm afraid we've encountered the Fauci-Uninformed-Counter-Knowledge-Information-Team movement of the sort that refuses to read or believe.
The F.U.C.K.I.T. resistance movement cannot be persuaded.
 
Did you not read what I asked you? Have you seen the Intercept article? Why not?
I asked because afterwards you may want to rethink the wisdom of your mission to salvage Fauci's reputation.
It's an article. It is not the alleged massive wad of documents-which I very much doubt anyone in the media has actually read through. I do not accept a news item without supporting evidence. You? Be my guest.
 
I'm afraid we've encountered the Fauci-Uninformed-Counter-Knowledge-Information-Team movement of the sort that refuses to read or believe.
The F.U.C.K.I.T. resistance movement cannot be persuaded.
Without Fauci you wouldn't have a vaccination programme. Thank goodness that idiot arse-kisser, Atlas, has disappeared into oblivion.
 
It's an article. It is not the alleged massive wad of documents-which I very much doubt anyone in the media has actually read through. I do not accept a news item without supporting evidence. You? Be my guest.
I'm assuming you're an adult so by now what you should expect is that there are links within articles such as the one in the Intercept.
Those links typically point to ... guess what ... the supporting evidence.
In this case, sure enough, 2 of the Grant Documents.
But you actually have to read the "news item".
That, coupled with the commentary of knowledgeable sources like the one in the OP who reviewed and understood the documents, should shake you to your F.U.C.K.I.T. core.
 
Without Fauci you wouldn't have a vaccination programme. Thank goodness that idiot arse-kisser, Atlas, has disappeared into oblivion.
Changing the subject, however wrong and unsupported by facts, is noted and expected given your F.U.C.K.I.T. creds.
 
Fauci lied and millions died. Trillions lost. It's not all on him but he was complicit with the CCP in weaponizing a virus.
 
Interesting accusations....

Not even close to being true.

But interesting.
Not even remotely interesting to me.
Just more conspiracy theory BS.
 
Objectively, Fauci has lied, and the evidence in hand demonstrates it.

It doesn't matter whether Alex Jones says that or a goat herder from Kathmandu. The reason attributed to why those people might say that is subjective, but that reason doesn't change the veracity of the statement that Fauci lied.
Of course, that statement is a lie
 
Interesting accusations....

Not even close to being true.

But interesting.

We live in interesting times.

Special counsels have been empaneled with far less evidence and far less consequence than for one to invested the Fauci, WHO, NHI, CCP relationship and origins of the WuFlu and what people knew and when they knew it. It's not part of the Democrat media narrative though. It would be for an honest one.
 






You gotta stop getting your news exclusively from that Chris Cuomo/Don Lemon mancrush show.
 
The only evidence against Fauci is fringe individuals and publications.
 






You gotta stop getting your news exclusively from that Chris Cuomo/Don Lemon mancrush show.

In checking the bona fides and motivations of those attacking or defending Fauci, I find that it has nothing whatever to do with what Fauci has said and done.

If a person declares Al Capone a murderer, for example, the statement is an objective fact, whether the person declaring it so is a saint or a sinner.

In this instance, it is an objective fact that Fauci has lied. That won't change regardless of who says it's so.
The bonafides and publications are that Fauci is the hero fighting against the epidemic and those attacking him are pandemic friends.
 
The bonafides and publications are that Fauci is the hero fighting against the epidemic and those attacking him are pandemic friends.
The fact that Fauci lied is an objective truth.

If Fauci is a hero to you, I shudder to think of the lofty position Biden occupies in your pantheon.
 
The only evidence against Fauci is fringe individuals and publications.
... and his own words. The man is as slippery as they come.
But "fringe" publications is a surprise given The Intercept is decidedly left-wing and normally nirvana for Left-wingers. Even the ones hiding behind "Centrist" camouflage.
Besides, anyone lazy enough to still be bitching about sources only shows they've not learned any lessons about the media.
 
The objective truth is that the statement above is false.
Did the NIAID fund the Wuhan lab?

Yes, the NIAID did fund the Wuhan lab. Fauci lied. There's no joy in that truth, but to deny that truth is to deny reality. There's more, but that alone is sufficient to establish the fact that Dr. Fauci has lied to us.

Good God, man. We have bodies stacking up in the streets, chillen is dying, and people everywhere are squirting apple flavored ivermectin into every available orfice. It's pandemonium out here. Why, I saw a guy at the grocery who cut open some of them little hot dog thingies and crammed one up each nostril because he didn't have a mask.

On a more positive note, Biden has been honored. Biden has been declared the Delaware State vegetable.
 
You have built a case that falls apart, humbolt.

Relook the facts surround the claim that Fauci knowingly lied.

You have none.
 
You have built a case that falls apart, humbolt.

Relook the facts surround the claim that Fauci knowingly lied.

You have none.
Don’t bother. The conspiracy theorists won’t believe the truth no matter what you tell them.
Sometimes I wonder if they actually believe what they are writing-or if they are intentionally lying just to stir the pot.
 
They may be actual paid enemy agents trying to poison American social media.

Or they may be outright nuts.
 
Did the NIAID fund the Wuhan lab?

Yes, the NIAID did fund the Wuhan lab. Fauci lied. There's no joy in that truth, but to deny that truth is to deny reality. There's more, but that alone is sufficient to establish the fact that Dr. Fauci has lied to us.

Good God, man. We have bodies stacking up in the streets, chillen is dying, and people everywhere are squirting apple flavored ivermectin into every available orfice. It's pandemonium out here. Why, I saw a guy at the grocery who cut open some of them little hot dog thingies and crammed one up each nostril because he didn't have a mask.

On a more positive note, Biden has been honored. Biden has been declared the Delaware State vegetable.
Excellent. Truly excellent.
 
Nope, another Big Lie being spread by the anti-vax crowd

What are they hiding? Why are they afraid?
 
Back
Top Bottom