- Joined
- Apr 20, 2005
- Messages
- 34,997
- Reaction score
- 19,771
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
I am saying that the wording isn't conclusive. It's not conclusive that the reporter is trying to tell us that the whole story has been corroborated.The story indicated that wintnesses (more then one) corroborated the account. If you don't like the wording or think the reporting is incorrect, take it up with the reporter.
And which part has been corroborated?
The whole things from start to end?
We already knew that there were witnesses to the two of them fighting. That is corroboration. But, it's not corroborating who started it.
So, you don't know for sure that anyone else saw it start. You're basing your belief on the way the reporter phrased his copy.
You may be right. But I'm not nearly as convinced as if there was something that said someone else saw it start.
Well yeah, if Z didn't start it and if Z shoots M right then not after M stops waling on him.A fight happened. That much we know. I dont think its possible to know with 100% certainty who threw the first punch or push. We have Zimmermans account. Zimmermans injuries match his account. If Martin was slamming Zimmermans head into the ground and Zimmerman was screaming for help and Martin continued beating on him, then I think it is self defense.
I am saying that the wording isn't conclusive. It's not conclusive that the reporter is trying to tell us that the whole story has been corroborated.
But,. if you will note, the article you link to cite this article as it's source:
Trayvon Martin: George Zimmerman's account to police of the Trayvon Martin shooting. - Orlando Sentinel
Which is the one I posted here earlier.
the article which is cited as source info for teh article you cited say this:
Which, imho, is markedly different than saying that witnesses had corroborated the entire series of events or even saw who started it."...and much of it has been corroborated by witnesses, authorities say."
of course, ymmv
So when someones following you and he turns away to go back their vehicle, you punch them, jump on them and start slamming their head in the street? Someone needs some anger management. Jack Nicholson is probably offering some discounted rates.
The contention is that the PD didn't look hard enough for evidence that might "negate Zimmermans story." I think that's the source of the community's displeasure. Who is watching the watchmen?I think what really matters here is does something negate what Zimmerman said? If you were to take Zimmermans account of what happened as truth, do you think he acted in self defense?
If you (or the prosecution) cannot negate Zimmermans story and if the law says that according to Z's account that he acted within the law, then he should not be arrested.
Zimmerman said that Trayvon struck first with a punch to his nose. How does one get punched in the nose if their back is to the one throwing the punch?
how does having marijuana residue make someone a badass or a thug? That is just ignorant. I suppose I am badass thug too because I certainly had some empty weed bags on my in high school. :roll:
Why would he need to defend himself from a 5'9" 250 pound man. He could have simply ran away preventing a scuffle from even happening.
Secondly why would someone that is 150-160 attempt to engage in a fistfight with someone so much larger unless he had the element of surprise?
According to Buck, Zimmerman had turned away and was heading back tohis truck.Zimmerman told them he lost sight of Trayvon and was walking back to his SUV when Trayvon approached him from the left rear, and they exchanged words.
Trayvon asked Zimmerman if he had a problem. Zimmerman said no and reached for his cell phone, he told police.
Trayvon then said, "Well, you do now" or something similar and punched Zimmerman in the nose.
Zimmerman fell to the ground and Trayvon got on top of him and began slamming his head into the sidewalk, he told police.
Zimmerman began yelling for help.
Trayvon Martin: George Zimmerman's account to police of the Trayvon Martin shooting. - Orlando Sentinel
I am saying that the wording isn't conclusive. It's not conclusive that the reporter is trying to tell us that the whole story has been corroborated.
But,. if you will note, the article you link to cite this article as it's source:
Trayvon Martin: George Zimmerman's account to police of the Trayvon Martin shooting. - Orlando Sentinel
Which is the one I posted here earlier.
the article which is cited as source info for teh article you cited say this:
Which, imho, is markedly different than saying that witnesses had corroborated the entire series of events or even saw who started it."...and much of it has been corroborated by witnesses, authorities say."
of course, ymmv
The contention is that the PD didn't look hard enough for evidence that might "negate Zimmermans story." I think that's the source of the community's displeasure. Who is watching the watchmen?
According to Buck, Zimmerman had turned away and was heading back tohis truck.
According to Buck, Zimmerman had turned away and was heading back tohis truck.
Perhaps he was 'standing his ground' as the State law advocates?
As to the second, a loaded gun and a belief in their own authority might overload their confidence level.
If you're outside of your home, you can't "stand your ground" until you've been attacked.
Was Buck a witness? Did he give a statement to police? If not, then because he said Z walked back to his truck really isnt relevant to the case. Or have you stopped discussing the events of that night and refocused yourself on trying to make Buck seem wrong?
It's relavent because it was one of Bucks' posts that I was responding to. You don't have to like that but you do have to live with it.
According to Buck, Zimmerman had turned away and was heading back tohis truck.
With a single punch, Trayvon Martin decked the Neighborhood Watch volunteer who eventually shot and killed the unarmed 17-year-old, then Trayvon climbed on top of George Zimmerman and slammed his head into the sidewalk several times, leaving him bloody and battered, authorities have revealed to the Orlando Sentinel.
That is the account Zimmerman gave police, and much of it has been corroborated by witnesses, authorities say.
Zimmerman has not spoken publicly about what happened, but that night, Feb. 26, and in later meetings he described and re-enacted for police what he says happened.
In his version of events, he had turned around and was walking back to his SUV when Trayvon approached him from behind, the two exchanged words then Trayvon punched him in the nose, sending him to the ground, and began beating him.
There is about a one-minute gap during which police say they're not sure what happened.
Zimmerman told them he lost sight of Trayvon and was walking back to his SUV when Trayvon approached him from the left rear, and they exchanged words.
Trayvon asked Zimmerman if he had a problem. Zimmerman said no and reached for his cell phone, he told police.
Trayvon then said, "Well, you do now" or something similar and punched Zimmerman in the nose.
Zimmerman fell to the ground and Trayvon got on top of him and began slamming his head into the sidewalk, he told police.
Zimmerman began yelling for help.
Several witnesses heard those cries, and there's been a dispute about from whom they came: Zimmerman or Trayvon.
Lawyers for Trayvon's family say it was Trayvon, but police say their evidence indicates it was Zimmerman.
He apparently did head back to his truck. So, when someone is following you, and they head back to their truck, do you chase them, punch them and start slamming their head into the ground? If so, try anger management.
Again ... how did Trayvon punch Zimmerman in the nose if his back was to him? And they were talking before Trayvon punched him in the nose ... why would Zimmerman turn his back on Trayvon?
Yes. And Martin perhaps thought he was being attacked by Zimmerman.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?