Ben K.
DP Veteran
- Joined
- May 2, 2010
- Messages
- 4,717
- Reaction score
- 1,981
- Location
- Dublin, Ireland
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
No, he wasn't even close. Setting off the bomb didn't cause his targets to crowd together to create a massed target for him.
Obviously, the objective of the Boston bombing was for the first bomb to create a massed target for the second bomb. This is Tactics 101 stuff.
You et. al. keep illustrating my point for me: those of you that have zero tactical training don't have any idea what was done here; hence, the bomber has had some kind of tactical training.
Anyone claimed responsibility for this terror? The police seem to have been informed about the threat. Plus if there were bomb squads there how did they not manage to find the bombs before they blew away?
No one has held their hand up yet.
I have heard nothing about the police knowing about this ahead of time. If you have a link, post it.
Where did you read that bomb squads were at the location?
Did you ever make a mistake in your life?
It's post 871 issued from Jango on this thread. A guy there states that there were police bomb squads ahead of the tournament. The link has already been posted.
Now I don't know what has me making mistakes in my life has anything to do with this tragedy! Nor do I find the context inviting for me to blabber about my life mistakes.
I appreciate the curiosity though. Perhaps in another thread...
If you'll take a look at a map you'll see that the USA has lots of borders other than the Mexican border.
Canadians handle their ****.
Look at where there is "complete" control, a prison. The "government" (not really, but for the purpose of the analogy) cannot even keep drugs and weapons out of prison... How could they protect against something like that?!
It's horrible I know, but really, other than the luck of catching the person in the act of placing something there's not much that can be done for prevention... Though, there are already calls for more cameras, but you can have cameras on everything, but you can't have the personnel to track it all...
But yes, this is a failure, but all reasonable steps are taken to mitigate the chances of these things happening so it takes someone truly motivated, and short of luck there's very little chance to actually prevent somethin like this, unfortunately. It doesn't matter how many armed guards / police you have around...
It's easy to attack other supposed mistakes, Eh?
Still makes no sense as far as numbers go, since just as many people would run the other direction, and many would run toward it, in order to either help or gawk; it seems it would be a wash as far as numbers of people in a given area.
I didn't see all the films, but the ones I did see didn't indicate enough to make that determination, and many of the films show the police trying to drive gawkers away from the first bomb as well as the second, especially since the second went off too soon after the first to make that matter as a tactic, at least from the vids I've seen; the surprise and shock made people stop in their tracks for the most part, followed by just as many people running toward the blasts as away.
Well, one in hollywood starts with the turning this into an anti-2nd amendment issue, saying we need to 'get rid of the 2nd amendment'...
Actor blames Boston attack on gun culture:
Is there anyone who contributes more to the 'gun culture' than Hollywood?
That's the crime in it all. Actual gun owners are almost exclusively good stewards with their arms. Hollywood glorifies guns as common means to an end, making heroes out of people who use them to kill.
The chicken and the egg argument aside, as a good number of gun owners shoot themselves or friend and family, how can you make a statement that doesn't take this into account?
It's human nature to avoid danger.
The chicken and the egg argument aside, as a good number of gun owners shoot themselves or friend and family, how can you make a statement that doesn't take this into account?
Is there anyone who contributes more to the 'gun culture' than Hollywood?
Try almost never. The percentages are infintesimally small. More people die straining too hard on the toilet.
How many people have ever been shot by a gun that wasn't there?
Just curious.
Moderator's Warning: |
The chicken and the egg argument aside, as a good number of gun owners shoot themselves or friend and family, how can you make a statement that doesn't take this into account?
How many people have ever been shot by a gun that wasn't there?
Just curious.
The same number who have actually flown to school on a unicorn. I see where you are going with this, living in a fantasy world is not going to fix a thing. There are close to 300,000,000 civilian owned guns in this country. The very fact that Chicago has such a high firearms murder rate is why you will never collect them all. In all these years those illegally owned weapons have not been collected, there is no way the rest of illegally owned guns will be found, and unless there is a way law abiding citizens are not going to give theirs up knowing the criminals still have theirs. In the future if you could restrict your comments to reality that would be nice. Otherwise it makes you look like you have no grasp of reality.
Whatever.
"Tolerance is giving to every other human being every right that you claim for yourself." ~ Robert Green Ingersoll
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?