So where are the books published on this? Titles? What is there besides a video?Just a basic introduction which I have taken off the net though I was introduced to the background ideas by the amazing Clif High. A remarkable polymath always erudite and interesting .
Whilst this reads ( following ) as though it is my introduction , it is not .
One or two of you may choose to DYOR and investigate further as the evidence is knocking back Tectonic Plate ideas despite Wikipedia' dogmatic assertions otherwise. A consistent Fake News source .
However , the person who first published the idea in 1975 was Tasmanian geologist Samuel Carey, who was well-respected.
Lately, with the many reports of ocean water vanishing from the coasts of southern Brazil, Tampa, Bahamas and now the eastern coast of India, to a degree unprecedented in the lifetimes of the locals, curiosity was piqued as to what may be causing this.
I caught a tweet from Clif High, in which he noted that the water reduction episodes have been occurring between the Tropics and the Equator and that the “sea floor falling” would be expected in an expansion event. Then I recalled that he’s a proponent of Expando-Earth so I decided to give it another look.
I discovered that mainstream geologists do agree that rocks as old as 4 billion years are found on land yet nothing older than 200 million years is ever found when taking core samples of the bedrock beneath the sea, which is handily explained by the Expanding Earth – and less elegantly explained away by subduction.
Celebrated book artist, Neal Adams is the man who made Expando-Earth viral on YouTube in 2007, when he posted parts of his documentary on the subject,. Adams believes the Earth’s expansion occurs through a process of pair production, which is the creation of an elementary particle and its antiparticle from a neutral boson.
As Adams says, “Why does the scientific community desperately cling to and promote the idea that the ocean bottom is sliding under the continents and into a magma which is twice as dense as solid granite, a totally unsupportable and scientifically unsound idea [subduction]? Because they’d have to observe and admit that the Earth is growing and that…is a very big deal. That would change everything in science, from the smallest particle to the whole universe – 100 years of scientific theory, out the window. That’s a lot to give u
I know, right?Lol o Lol!
that chick is way, way, way out there.Lol o Lol!
The problem the Mods are going to have is that this is too weird for even the CT. What the hell are they to do with it?
Magma is twice as dense as granite? Am I missing something because magma is liquid. Why could rock not go into magma and melt?Just a basic introduction which I have taken off the net though I was introduced to the background ideas by the amazing Clif High. A remarkable polymath always erudite and interesting .
Whilst this reads ( following ) as though it is my introduction , it is not .
One or two of you may choose to DYOR and investigate further as the evidence is knocking back Tectonic Plate ideas despite Wikipedia' dogmatic assertions otherwise. A consistent Fake News source .
However , the person who first published the idea in 1975 was Tasmanian geologist Samuel Carey, who was well-respected.
Lately, with the many reports of ocean water vanishing from the coasts of southern Brazil, Tampa, Bahamas and now the eastern coast of India, to a degree unprecedented in the lifetimes of the locals, curiosity was piqued as to what may be causing this.
I caught a tweet from Clif High, in which he noted that the water reduction episodes have been occurring between the Tropics and the Equator and that the “sea floor falling” would be expected in an expansion event. Then I recalled that he’s a proponent of Expando-Earth so I decided to give it another look.
I discovered that mainstream geologists do agree that rocks as old as 4 billion years are found on land yet nothing older than 200 million years is ever found when taking core samples of the bedrock beneath the sea, which is handily explained by the Expanding Earth – and less elegantly explained away by subduction.
Celebrated book artist, Neal Adams is the man who made Expando-Earth viral on YouTube in 2007, when he posted parts of his documentary on the subject,. Adams believes the Earth’s expansion occurs through a process of pair production, which is the creation of an elementary particle and its antiparticle from a neutral boson.
As Adams says, “Why does the scientific community desperately cling to and promote the idea that the ocean bottom is sliding under the continents and into a magma which is twice as dense as solid granite, a totally unsupportable and scientifically unsound idea [subduction]? Because they’d have to observe and admit that the Earth is growing and that…is a very big deal. That would change everything in science, from the smallest particle to the whole universe – 100 years of scientific theory, out the window. That’s a lot to give u
No need to worry.... some sort of aether will be absorbed within my Brain and transformed into new chemical elements, forcing my brain to expand.We fully understand how Galileo felt or Nicola Tesla coming closer to today .
You take it easy guys .
When you are low on braincells look after each one carefully . Stretching them can be painful . But then you know that already . rofl .
Just a basic introduction which I have taken off the net though I was introduced to the background ideas by the amazing Clif High. A remarkable polymath always erudite and interesting .
Whilst this reads ( following ) as though it is my introduction , it is not .
One or two of you may choose to DYOR and investigate further as the evidence is knocking back Tectonic Plate ideas despite Wikipedia' dogmatic assertions otherwise. A consistent Fake News source .
However , the person who first published the idea in 1975 was Tasmanian geologist Samuel Carey, who was well-respected.
Lately, with the many reports of ocean water vanishing from the coasts of southern Brazil, Tampa, Bahamas and now the eastern coast of India, to a degree unprecedented in the lifetimes of the locals, curiosity was piqued as to what may be causing this.
I caught a tweet from Clif High, in which he noted that the water reduction episodes have been occurring between the Tropics and the Equator and that the “sea floor falling” would be expected in an expansion event. Then I recalled that he’s a proponent of Expando-Earth so I decided to give it another look.
I discovered that mainstream geologists do agree that rocks as old as 4 billion years are found on land yet nothing older than 200 million years is ever found when taking core samples of the bedrock beneath the sea, which is handily explained by the Expanding Earth – and less elegantly explained away by subduction.
Celebrated book artist, Neal Adams is the man who made Expando-Earth viral on YouTube in 2007, when he posted parts of his documentary on the subject,. Adams believes the Earth’s expansion occurs through a process of pair production, which is the creation of an elementary particle and its antiparticle from a neutral boson.
As Adams says, “Why does the scientific community desperately cling to and promote the idea that the ocean bottom is sliding under the continents and into a magma which is twice as dense as solid granite, a totally unsupportable and scientifically unsound idea [subduction]? Because they’d have to observe and admit that the Earth is growing and that…is a very big deal. That would change everything in science, from the smallest particle to the whole universe – 100 years of scientific theory, out the window. That’s a lot to give u
As above makes interesting reading .
Of course the vast majority of people loathe change and are reluctant to leave what they consider as world affirming narratives .
The Tectonic Plate theory was fine for decade or two but there are too many gaps when results are compared to predictions implied by the theory .
EE is the next development and in time might itself require revision / modification .
But that is how science progresses . Not by being lazy and sticking your head in the sand .
Magma is twice as dense as granite? Am I missing something because magma is liquid. Why could rock not go into magma and melt?
Just want to highlight this bit:Celebrated book artist, Neal Adams is the man who made Expando-Earth viral on YouTube in 2007, when he posted parts of his documentary on the subject,. Adams believes the Earth’s expansion occurs through a process of pair production, which is the creation of an elementary particle and its antiparticle from a neutral boson.
It very much is in that same school of thought. Some people just have a psychological quirk that makes them interpret "none of the experts in this field agree with this idea" as evidence that the idea is true and everyone is hiding the truth. Facts, reason, and evidence will never convince them they are wrong because their ideas were never based on reason or facts to begin with.When I was a lass, they taught continental drift, but not plate tectonics. I found it fascinating when 20 years later in college I heard about it. It made total sense. Is this expanding earth theory in the same school of thought as flat earth theory? Sounds almost as if we're going backwards.
It very much is in that same school of thought. Some people just have a psychological quirk that makes them interpret "none of the experts in this field agree with this idea" as evidence that the idea is true and everyone is hiding the truth. Facts, reason, and evidence will never convince them they are wrong because their ideas were never based on reason or facts to begin with.
I've often remarked that the conspiracy theory isn't so much based on something that is false, but rather having a ridiculous interpretation of something that is true. The old adage about hearing hooves and thinking horses instead of zebras, the conspiracy theorist hears hooves and thinks unicorns. So, the reason your explanation of "unicorns aren't real" doesn't work is that they have the "proof" already, they hear the hooves, you sheeple! Are you saying the hooves aren't real!?
The internet inflates this problem. It helps these people find each other and reinforce the ideas. Gives them a safe haven, that special in-group that is in on the secret everyone else misses. The support and approval they get for their ideas contrasts with the ridicule from the out-group, hardening their beliefs. Very much mirrors cult behavior.
The problem the Mods are going to have is that this is too weird for even the CT. What the hell are they to do with it?
Stop trolling and stop making personal attacksA problem probably only on a par with you losing your teeth and /or specs and/or hearing aid .
But if you concentrate , you can invariably solve a problem if you put in some honest effort .
I think you will also enjoy the recent , Late Appearance of the Moon theory , the Hollow Moon theory , and the Moon used as a Space Centre by the US Space Programme and Aliens .
The latter more a fact than theory .
And don't forget Hollow Earth , though not even I can do much to promote the Flat Earth idea .
Off you go to stock up with medication and I will then let you in to a few more secrets, Mister Gullible .
No . Flat Earth theory is the most difficult to successfully promote as it is so obviously a joke .When I was a lass, they taught continental drift, but not plate tectonics. I found it fascinating when 20 years later in college I heard about it. It made total sense. Is this expanding earth theory in the same school of thought as flat earth theory? Sounds almost as if we're going backwards.
All of those theories exist and there is very interesting support evidence for Hollow Earth and Recent Moon .Stop trolling and stop making personal attacks
One of my favorite videos is the flat earthers doing an actual field test of the Earth's curvature to prove their case only to have the results match exactly with the obvious reality. They just stare, trying to process.No . Flat Earth theory is the most difficult to successfully promote as it is so obviously a joke .
However, some very clever people support it avidly --- or perhaps just pretend to .
And some 'proofs' are mathematically very ingenious .
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?