• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Existence of God

Does God exist?

  • Yes

    Votes: 14 35.9%

  • No

    Votes: 21 53.8%

  • Maybe

    Votes: 4 10.3%
  • Total voters
    39
sangha said:
I just figured that one irrlevant comment deserved another.

No has claimed that "descriptions of knowledge" are limited by any standards of logic or reason. In fact, I'm not even sure what that means,

But we have a poster who has posted one philosophical description of knowledge and refuses to consider any other philosophical description of knowledge but the one he approves of. I hope that clears up your misunderstanding
Click to expand...

Actually the alleged other "philosophical description of knowledge" was based on ESP which is purely unscientific nonsense. I know quite well what the discussion was, and was stating the valid standards for knowledge.
 
I'm technically agnostic (in the sense that I recognize that logically speaking we cannot know that God doesn't exist any more than we can prove that He does exist), but a de facto atheist (in the sense that I have no compelling reason to affirmatively behave or think as if God does exist).
 
Lachean said:
Actually the alleged other "philosophical description of knowledge" was based on ESP which is purely unscientific nonsense. I know quite well what the discussion was, and was stating the valid standards for knowledge.
Click to expand...

I don't remember any reference to ESP, so I don't know what you're talking about. I am referring to scourges' insistence that we all adhere to the definition he linked to (ie the one from Stamford)
 
sangha said:
I don't remember any reference to ESP, so I don't know what you're talking about. I am referring to scourges' insistence that we all adhere to the definition he linked to (ie the one from Stamford)
Click to expand...

I did not demand you adhere to any definition. If you want to use a different definition then SPECIFY it.

I HIGHLY RECOMMEND you use definitions that come from academia because its far too time consuming and tedious to debug every amateurs opinion on the matter.

But you won't give us a clear and direct definition. You are too busy being dishonest and evasive, believing that such behavior qualifies as debate.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom