• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

"Everyone welcome" is now unacceptable.

No, it's double speak to say tolerance requires one to be tolerant of intolerance.
Definition of tolerance.

"willingness to accept behavior and beliefs that are different from your own, although you might not agree with or approve of them"


There is no exception for so-called intolerance. But Leftist doublespeak creates a false excuse for their intolerance.
 
Definition of tolerance.

"willingness to accept behavior and beliefs that are different from your own, although you might not agree with or approve of them"


There is no exception for so-called intolerance. But Leftist doublespeak creates a false excuse for their intolerance.
Saying somone who advocates tolerance must tolerate intolerance is contradictory double speak.
 
What are you suggesting is fabricated?

The reason for the teacher allegedly quitting - the rest of the story, as they say. These type of outrage tales are always demagoguery intended to smear the opposition and never turn out to be as presented.
 
The reason for the teacher allegedly quitting - the rest of the story, as they say. These type of outrage tales are always demagoguery intended to smear the opposition and never turn out to be as presented.
Did you read the article. Bith sides agree that that is the reason.
 
Did you read the article. Bith sides agree that that is the reason.

Both sides?

{Marcus Myers clarified that, "The political environment ebbs and flows, and what might be controversial now might not have been controversial three, six, nine months ago."}

That's the extent of "both sides."

This is another entitled leftist that thinks she doesn't have to follow the rules. She doesn't have to agree, but she does have to follow the orders of her superiors. That's reality for grown ups in the workplace.

Note that she wasn't reprimanded, much less fired, she threw a hissy fit and quit. I assure you there is far more to this than she is saying.
 
Both sides?

{Marcus Myers clarified that, "The political environment ebbs and flows, and what might be controversial now might not have been controversial three, six, nine months ago."}

That's the extent of "both sides."

This is another entitled leftist that thinks she doesn't have to follow the rules. She doesn't have to agree, but she does have to follow the orders of her superiors. That's reality for grown ups in the workplace.

Note that she wasn't reprimanded, much less fired, she threw a hissy fit and quit. I assure you there is far more to this than she is saying.
Her sign reflects national education policy as well as federal law.

The fact that her "superiors" told her to take it down demonstrates that it is them that are not following policy.

Bottom line though, no one disputes that she had the sign up and was told to take it down.

So what is it you are saying is fabricated?
 
When you post UpWorthy demagoguery as if it were anything but reactionary crap - it's fully expected that others will call it out.
Posting a sign with different color hands in a classroom saying everyone is welcome is only demagoguery to magidiots. Reactionary is the response to a sign that had been up for years thanks to the malignant narcissist scumbag piece of shit liar grifter rapist seditionist felon serial adulterer and tax cheat and his idiot supporters.
 
Posting a sign with different color hands in a classroom saying everyone is welcome is only demagoguery to magidiots. Reactionary is the response to a sign that had been up for years thanks to the malignant narcissist scumbag piece of shit liar grifter rapist seditionist felon serial adulterer and tax cheat and his idiot supporters.

Such lofty discourse.

Your posts are jokes.
 
Posting a sign with different color hands in a classroom saying everyone is welcome is only demagoguery to magidiots.

No one is saying the sign is demagoguery. Stalinists tend to be as stupid as they are dishonest. The sign is a symptom of the defiance by the DEI promoting teacher who demanded she was in charge and answered to no one.

Reactionary is the response to a sign that had been up for years thanks to the malignant narcissist scumbag piece of shit liar grifter rapist seditionist felon serial adulterer and tax cheat and his idiot supporters.

The tourettes appears to be acting up again, Hari.
 
Saying somone who advocates tolerance must tolerate intolerance is contradictory double speak.
Who is saying that? I provided a dictionary definition that contradicts the Leftist doublespeak. Can't deal with it, so you parrot the talking point.
 
Who is saying that? I provided a dictionary definition that contradicts the Leftist doublespeak. Can't deal with it, so you parrot the talking point.
Review the conversation if you dont know who said thst.

The definition doesn't contradict my point in the slightest.
 
No one is saying the sign is demagoguery. Stalinists tend to be as stupid as they are dishonest. The sign is a symptom of the defiance by the DEI promoting teacher who demanded she was in charge and answered to no one.



The tourettes appears to be acting up again, Hari.
1000003774.webp

1000003773.webp
 
Review the conversation if you dont know who said thst.
See post 452.
The definition doesn't contradict my point in the slightest.
Here is the definition

"willingness to accept behavior and beliefs that are different from your own, although you might not agree with or approve of them"

You unambiguously stated that tolerance doesn't require acceptance of anything that you consider intolerant. That directly contradicts the definition.
 
It implies to kids that they may not be welcome in other classrooms. It's idiotic and unnecessary.
I bet you are fine with the 10 Commandments being posted in classrooms, yet have no concern for non Christian children who may view them.
 
See post 452.

Here is the definition

"willingness to accept behavior and beliefs that are different from your own, although you might not agree with or approve of them"

You unambiguously stated that tolerance doesn't require acceptance of anything that you consider intolerant. That directly contradicts the definition.
If tolerance required tolerance of intolerance it would be self contradictory
 
If tolerance required tolerance of intolerance it would be self contradictory
I don't tolerate pistachio ice cream. My family is tolerant of my intolerance though.

Hmmm....I'm not seeing a contradiction.
 
I don't tolerate pistachio ice cream. My family is tolerant of my intolerance though.
Pistachio ice cream is not intolerance.

Pistachio ice cream is not the opposite of tolerance like intolerance is.

Think it through.
Hmmm....I'm not seeing a contradiction.
Because there isnt one in your analogy.

Fricken duh!
 
Pistachio ice cream is not intolerance.

Pistachio ice cream is not the opposite of tolerance like intolerance is.

Think it through.

Because there isnt one in your analogy.

Fri ken duh!

Nobody said that pistachio ice cream is intolerance.

How are you going to tell me that I'm mistaken in my intolerance for pistachio ice cream? That's a helluva presumptuous attitude there.
 
you arent.

I'm not mistaken?

Then it's a fact I'm intolerant of pistachio ice cream.

However, my family is tolerant of my intolerance.
 
Back
Top Bottom