Having been someone whose built and led organizations all over the world, I've been held professionally accountable for understanding labor markets. What are your credentials here?
Lmao.
I was the King of Siam.
The $182 billion is from a flawed study created by a partisan anti-immigration organization called FAIR. They significantly overestimate their cost and underestimate their contributions with a number of errors including:
They dont allow nearly enough in to meet the labor needs of the US ag economy.Why are you acting like there is no such thing as LEGAL migrant workers?
MigrantWorker.gov
www.dol.gov
Please pardon my ignorance, but why exactly is the market model not applicable when it applies to paying higher wages? Imagine someone in politics said that gas is too expensive, so people should just open up the underground tank and steal it!
In other words, you lack any relevant experience whatsoever. This is not surprising, BTW.Lmao.
Not interested in your mirror, Nat.
JUST RAISE WAGES
Your understanding of free markets is consumed by politics. It's invalid. And quickly boring. You're wrong. Deal.
I was the King of Siam.
Good stuff, Nat.
That could be changed! Why on Earth would we think that replacing illegal with legal laborers doesn't require some legal immigration reform?
It's as if he wants to maintain the immigration plantation system of labor.
Millions of immigrants living in the country illegally were granted amnesty under Reagan. Reagan knew it was better economically to grant them amnesty than to have mass deportations. If Reagan was alive today, he would be considered part of "the left" by MAGA Republicans.
Of course it does. Democrats try. Republicans block it. Every time.
Put down the keyboard and become one.Why are you acting like there is no such thing as LEGAL migrant workers?
MigrantWorker.gov
Your emoji generated zero agricultural products for US consumption.
I'm talking about the agricultural sector. This sector is operating on a model that requires illegal labor. The immigration status of willing workers is incidental. Status can be changed with legislation. Willingness to do the work exists outside this status. Indeed, only half the workforce is undocumented. The other half are legally working and willing. If there were more willing legal workers, they would occupy a greater percentage of the total.
Did Abbey Hoffman say that?
I have plenty of trolling experience, but not as much as you, Nat.
I don't need to explore that scenario. I hire people with Green Cards as part of my job. And no, people with legal Green Card status should not be deported.
Its repebkicans who always block attempts to fix it.
As posted prior, there already exist legal migrant work options. There are already quite a number of seasonal and other forms of legal "temporary" work status opportunities.
Why are you acting like there is no such thing as LEGAL migrant workers?
MigrantWorker.gov
There is no need to flood the country just so rich folks in places like Martha's Vineyards can save money by hiring illegals and paying them crap wages under the table while controlling them via threats to report them to ICE.
Sour grapes. You've been caught blovating on a matter in which you have little to no experience.
Then how are you getting tjis so wrong?
They've begun enforcing immigration law, and that's an excellent first step.
I'm not.
