- Joined
- Jan 15, 2019
- Messages
- 49,288
- Reaction score
- 41,196
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
Well, then I guess elon and everyone should be mad at google and apple not just apple. But, don't tell anyone thats a musk fan boy about that.Google, like Apple, charges 15% on the first $1M, both are 30% after $1M
Now you're arguing against your own previous statement.
You went on about how difficult it was, and then act like it's no big deal. That's with Apple and Google controlling 95% of the app market in the US between them.How so?
I said that if they don't want to be a cog in the machine, they are free to do it on thier own. Twice even.
Apple and Twitter are for profit business, they can choose who they do business with as long as they don't discriminate based on the protected classes.Apple has the unilateral ability to remove Twitter from the App Store, which would suppress freedom of speech.
Ron DeSantis mentioned this:
Ron DeSantis backs Elon Musk, warns Apple against axing Twitter from App Store
Gov. Ron DeSantis said Apple would be making a “huge, huge mistake” by nixing Twitter.nypost.com
But not required.Phones are mainly valuable because of the apps.
But not required.
One can always use a search engine or other means to get to a website they want.
Does having apps make earning more money easier for those who have one?
Apple and Twitter are for profit business, they can choose who they do business with as long as they don't discriminate based on the protected classes.
That is free market captialism.
I have a problem with all slave labor camps. Even Ivanka's shoe factory.And you have no problem with Apple's slave labor camps?
Convenient to do what?Using apps like Uber is much more convenient to use on a desktop.
Convenient to do what?
I have a problem with all slave labor camps. Even Ivanka's shoe factory.
How about you?
Never owned an Apple product.
Are you against free market capitalism?
Well, there really is no such thing as free market. Someone somewhere can and does game the system in some way.Are we in free market capitalism? Have you seen how the FTC has been acting?
Easier to make money for those who have apps. So, they pay for the easier way to make money.Get a ride......??
Also the same with wallet apps. I don't want to log in to access my credit cards. It is convenient to open my wallet.
Well, there really is no such thing as free market. Someone somewhere can and does game the system in some way.
Free market is a text book concept.
What has the FTC done?
You went on about how difficult it was, and then act like it's no big deal. That's with Apple and Google controlling 95% of the app market in the US between them.
Should I?So when Apple buys Disney, you will have no problem with that and the FTC approving a merger between these two giants?
What's the point of making an app if you can't get wide distribution? Your comment doesn't make sense.They control the delivery of 95% of the app market. They didnt produce 95% of the apps. That means that the people making the apps COULD find another delivery method. The problem with that is it would require them creating all of the backoffice stuff that doing so entails. Apparently, it's worth the 30% fee not to have to do that.
It seems kind silly to complain about them not wanting to undertake that cost of business and then at the same time bitch about the people doing it for them
What's the point of making an app if you can't get wide distribution? Your comment doesn't make sense.
I'm not implying anything. I'm stating facts.Of course it does.
You are essentially implying that Apple or Google owe the app developer a bigger distribution audience for nothing.
I'm not implying anything. I'm stating facts.
Why are their only two major players? Isn't that an anticompetitive market?
Okay,
Let's say it costs Apple to create and Manage the app store $10 a month
And Apple makes over $100 a month in fees.
Look it up. The cost of creating and managing an app store is peanuts compared to how much they make.
Craigslist has less than 50 employees and does a billion in revenue annually.
It is not that hard to manage an app store.
Apple needs to be held accountable for its actions. Have you seen the Apple Sweatshops that use nets to capture workers from trying to kill themselves?
Life and death in Apple’s forbidden city
In an extract from his new book, Brian Merchant reveals how he gained access to Longhua, the vast complex where iPhones are made and where, in 2010, unhappy workers started killing themselveswww.theguardian.com
Apple is essentially charging a tax on the internet. Spotify and Facebook, for example, are stand-alone sites that you can access on the internet. They can be accessed without an apple product. However, Apple wants a piece of the pie essentially for these companies having their app on an ios device.
It makes zero sense for Apple to get a 30% cut for an in-app purchase when these purchases can be made out-of-the app.
Apple is simply the middleman, and they want a 30% cut. A typical cut for a middleman is 10-15%.