- Joined
- Oct 17, 2013
- Messages
- 5,342
- Reaction score
- 1,170
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
Other then the Christian Right being all in on torturing kids, what more do you need to know about how evil they are?
Twitter Mocks Falwell Jr.’s Bizarre Outrage Over Compassion for Kids at Border Facilities: ‘Did Jesus Ever Meet a Payroll?’
You are right he did not mention the right or Trump.
Have any good ideas on policies should be changed to help?
Trump? Please show where in my post the word "Trump" appeared.
Nope and because I'm not a politician, I don't have to come up with any.
Jerry Falwell is not the "Christin Right." This illogical argument is parallel to the illogical argument of referencing a Marxist in the Democratic Party as evidence the Democratic Party "being all in on" Marxism.
Bravo for resorting to fallacious and illogical reasoning.
Truth is one does not have to lift a finger to be pro-fetus. They only need to raise their loud voice. We know.
But, to help an actual child, now, that takes work. Work in which most pro-fetus people refuse to participate.
Work in which most pro-fetus people refuse to participate
He's a big ****ing part of it.
Ok I just thought you were here to debate political ideas. Thanks
When?
Yeah? Where is the data to support this claim? Let's start with providing data. No, I will probably be waiting in perpetuity. Provide the data when you can.
Moving past your lack of data to support your claim, what about being "pro life" requires "pro lifers" to act in a particular way in regards to the tragedy under discussion at the border and more generally in regards to the current immigration laws/policy of the U.S. as they operate at the border?
If you are not too busy, I know it can be burdensome to substantiate one's claims and expound upon their arguments, tell me how the U.S. immigration laws and policy "CAUSED" this man to take his toddler and make a long, precarious trip to the U.S.-Mexico border, and then engage in the hazardous conduct of swimming across the river with his toddler and then make the risky decision to leave her on one side of the river alone.
The empirical data I have seen so far Leeds me to conclude I am correct here.
I'm sorry that your gut reaction to this was lack of empathy for the victims here. You should think long and hard about that.
Yeah? Where is the data to support this claim? Let's start with providing data. No, I will probably be waiting in perpetuity. Provide the data when you can.
Moving past your lack of data to support your claim, what about being "pro life" requires "pro lifers" to act in a particular way in regards to the tragedy under discussion at the border and more generally in regards to the current immigration laws/policy of the U.S. as they operate at the border?
If you are not too busy, I know it can be burdensome to substantiate one's claims and expound upon their arguments, tell me how the U.S. immigration laws and policy "CAUSED" this man to take his toddler and make a long, precarious trip to the U.S.-Mexico border, and then engage in the hazardous conduct of swimming across the river with his toddler and then make the risky decision to leave her on one side of the river alone.
Tell me then what pro-fetus activists do to help actual children. In this thread they mock the death of one. You have a high hurdle to jump overcoming that.
Crickets are loud this time of year.
Hmm...looks like we have crisis at the border. Its good that liberals finally realize that.
You can always tell the political bent of the news source depending on how they refer to illegals. Illegals have morphed from "undocumented" to "migrants" to "asylum seekers". Its another example of doublespeak from the left.
Indeed, and the noise from the "crickets" rings loudest in one's own ear when that noise is from thine own hand, specifically your repeated failure to substantiate your claims in post after post. It is ironic you insist I substantiate what "pro fetus activists have do to help actual children" when I have never asserted one way or the other on such a point, when you very apparently cannot substantiate your own claims!
Of course, what they do for children is irrelevant and unlike you, I choose not to make irrelevant claims, which explains why I have not and will not claim what they have or have not done for "actual children."
Your arguments, no wait, you have not made an argument, your claims are at this moment vacuous. Your diatribes are entertaining but nothing else.
Be interesting to see the reactions if they were say of Scandinavian descent.
That's exactly why I'm here. To debate their ideas and talk about issues that need to be addressed by them.
Facts back up my assertion. Just look at the immoral president the Evangelical Christians support by over 80% for proof of that.
BTW, whining about how bad your religion is being perceived while children are dying is not a good look. And, pointing to fetuses while a toddler lies face down in a dirty river looks even worse.
Just look at the immoral president the Evangelical Christians support by over 80% for proof of that.
Facts back up my assertion
And yet you have no interest in putting forth an idea when asked? okay
Here is my thought on the subject, The Democrats are the current obstacle in working towards fixing what is becoming a huge issue at the border. I think they need to work with the Republicans and Trump to hash out a deal that will put more trained staff to work at the border dealing with the poor housing and living conditions that exist, more lawyers and judges to expedite the cases that need to move through, and more medical staff to deal with the malnutrition and dehydration that has been a problem with most of the Refugees.
What are your thoughts?
Be interesting to see the reactions if they were say of Scandinavian descent.
This fact provides no information of how "Evangelical Christians" view the immigration laws/policy of the U.S., the immigration scenario at the border, or this recent tragedy of the father and daughter. And, what study are you citing and referring to in support of your "80%" claim?
If only typing it made it so. You have cited to no facts supporting much of what you have said in this thread. No, wait, my bad, mea culpa, the word "much" implies you have said something having factual support and I cannot find anything you have said in this thread to have factual support. Strike that factually inaccurate comment I made, as it lacks factual support by your posts. You have cited to no facts supporting anything you have said in this thread (Yes, I am employing an element of sarcasm, hyperbole, here).
The presumed data point of "80%" comment, that informs no one of anything about the beliefs regarding the recent tragedy at the border, immigration law/policy, and/or the immigration scenario at the border, is but one more example of non-existent facts to "back up" your "assertion."
There was a saying in law school. When you have the law, and no facts, argue the law. When you have the facts, but not the law, argue the facts. When you lack both, scream like hell. Your posts are nothing more than diatribes of you screaming like hell.
Doubling down on whining about the perception of your religion while mocking dead children. Not a good look.
You didn't put forth an idea. You made a partisan comment blaming this on the Democrats. "They need to work with the Republicans" isn't a solution.
The Democrats have funding bills on the table.
And your "solution" didn't address the issue of people still wanting, after 4 centuries, to migrate to the United States. And people like Trump saying we don't have room for them - after he found room for his wife and her parents.
Tell Trump to hire more judges. He's in charge of the DOJ - not the Democrats. Tell Trump to expedite cases - he's in charge of the DOJ, not the Democrats.
You would think someone would care that so many are willing to die to get here. But, alas.
We now make it so hard for refugees to get in, they drown trying.
History will not look back kindly at this moment.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?