- Joined
- Aug 22, 2018
- Messages
- 17,786
- Reaction score
- 14,296
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
And the proper Christian response to this is what?
IDK, maybe not to celebrate their deaths?
And the proper Christian response to this is what?
IDK, maybe not to celebrate their deaths?
If your reaction to the image of a man and his two-year-old daughter lying dead on the banks of a river is anything but horror and sadness, you should probably think about where you went wrong as a person.
https://mobile.twitter.com/MEPFuller/status/1143638808694599680
You would think someone would care that so many are willing to die to get here. But, alas.
We now make it so hard for refugees to get in, they drown trying.
History will not look back kindly at this moment.
I guess its Trump's fault that they can't swim?
Did you have a good idea on how the policies should change to help with this problem?
Or did you just want to attack the right and Trump?
You would think someone would care that so many are willing to die to get here. But, alas.
We now make it so hard for refugees to get in, they drown trying.
History will not look back kindly at this moment.
The U.S. policy caused this man to take his very young daughter, a toddler, and make a rather perilous journey to the U.S.-Mexican border, and then engage in the hazardous conduct of swimming across a river with his toddler? Tell me more.
Yes, because these are the "pro life" folks here.
Did you have a good idea on how the policies should change to help with this problem?
Or did you just want to attack the right and Trump?
Opposing the decision of Roe v. Wade, on the basis of being "pro life" is not inconsistent with advocating for an immigration policy providing for an orderly entry into the country, including a limitation on who may apply for asylum. Adhering to a "pro life" position in the U.S. to protect unborn fetuses, does not logically demand any particular or specific immigration policy in the U.S.
The immigration policies of the U.S. were not the cause of this tragedy.
You got most of it. What more do you need? Ah, you want to tell me that battening down the hatches when over half our country is fat and happy while the other half is obese and obscenely wealthy (from a global perspective) is somehow justified now. Yeah....give me that good old Christian argument for that.
This should be good.
Yeah....give me that good old Christian argument for that.
It sure has highlighted a lack of compassion and humanity amongst those who claim to be pro-life though.
Opposing the decision of Roe v. Wade, on the basis of being "pro life" is not inconsistent with advocating for an immigration policy providing for an orderly entry into the country, including a limitation on who may apply for asylum. Adhering to a "pro life" position in the U.S. to protect unborn fetuses, does not logically demand any particular or specific immigration policy in the U.S.
The immigration policies of the U.S. were not the cause of this tragedy.
Really? The U.S. policy was the "cause" for this man to take his very young daughter, a toddler, and make a rather perilous journey to the U.S.-Mexican border, and then engage in the hazardous conduct of swimming across a river with his toddler?
How did the U.S. policy "cause" this man to behave in this manner?
I could not care less about your obsession of what is or is not a "Christian argument."
Has it? Do we have a scientific poll, scientific data, of the number of "pro life" people expressing a point of view about this tragedy at the border that can best be characterized as lacking "compassion and humanity"?
Being pro fetus is lip service to being pro-life in that one has to do nothing but scream at women who seek abortions. Now, caring for immigrants fleeing violence in their home country, that takes real work. So, I totally understand why the pro-fetus crowd abdicates taking any part in that responsibility.
Being pro fetus is lip service to being pro-life
I could not care less about your diatribe regarding what you think is a lack of sincerity on behalf of people. It is speculative. It is irrelevant.
Just read replies on this forum and other news sites you'll notice a strong correlation between the Christian Right and lack of compassion.
Facing the truth is the hardest part. I know.
"Replies on this forum" are hardly scientific, and lack the necessary requirements to make a rational and logical judgment about the "Christian Right." Same is true for those "news sites" you reference.
"Replies on this forum" are hardly scientific, and lack the necessary requirements to make a rational and logical judgment about the "Christian Right." Same is true for those "news sites" you reference.
If one treats your speculative diatribes as "truth," perhaps, but I am not one to just believe your speculative screaming in a crowded room constitutes as "truth" just because you make the most noise and are astute at throwing conversational grenades. Which is to say, the "hardest part" is actually supporting your bull crap with facts, and until you do provide facts, you are not necessarily providing truth, you are just peddling bull crap.
I missed Trump's name in his post. Where is it? Where did he mention "the right" too?