• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Doug Emhoff accused of ‘forcefully slapping’ NYC girlfriend

Not one single person has leveled a charge of domestic violence, assault, sexual harassment, etc against Doug.

Not a single one.

And yet here you are spreading unsubstantiated rumors.

Why?
Because they don't know what Ms Harris' next door neighbor's, second cousin's, former girlfriend's, third grade best friend's, brother's, stepfather's, grandfather did?
 
This guy still campaigning on "reshaping the perception of masculinity"?

 
Are any Democrat cheerleaders denying that Kamala's hubby knocked-up the nanny?

Ime the choice of a mate is a good indicator of a person's ability to judge character..
 
Last edited:
Are any Democrat cheerleaders denying that Kamala's hubby knocked-up the nanny?

Ime the choice of a mate is a good indicator of a person's ability to judge character..
I think you should refresh your memory about what a couple Trump’s wives were doing before he married them.
 
Are any Democrat cheerleaders denying that Kamala's hubby knocked-up the nanny?

Ime the choice of a mate is a good indicator of a person's ability to judge character..
I prefer to judge the character of the candidate and in that regard Trump is a non starter
 
I think you should refresh your memory about what a couple Trump’s wives were doing before he married them.

:rolleyes:

I know all about that. I didn't/won't vote for shit puppet Trump/Republicans. I dislike him/them for many many reasons: his/their stinking murderous foreign policy, his/their monetary ignorance, his/their lack of support for government transparency, etc... These ^^^ are some of the things most important to me...

Ime as to these ^^^ issues only a naive fool/ignoramus could/would quibble about any important differences between either Republicrat shit puppet... It's been that way for decades... I have voted for exactly one R/D shit puppet in the last 30 years...Ron Paul in the 2008 primary..
 
Last edited:
How is that relevant?
Well, you appear to think that his conduct is indicative of his fitness to hold public office, so I was wondering exactly what public office he was running for.

On the other hand, maybe you can refresh my memory of what the next door neighbor's second cousin's former girlfriend's third grade best friend's brother's stepfather's grandfathers of both Ms Harris and Mr Trump did - because I am sure that what they did has some existential bearing on the fitness of Ms Harris and Mr Trump to hold public office.
 
I think Melania did it better. She just wore a cool jacket. It was a scandal or whatever.

Nothing close to as violent as Doug is, but most of his supporters will dismiss it.
 
I think you should refresh your memory about what a couple Trump’s wives were doing before he married them.
Did they slap women?
 

NYPost as a source.....

rightcenter011.png

Overall we rate the New York Post on the far end of Right-Center Biased due to story selection that typically favors the Right and Mixed (borderline questionable) for factual reporting based on several failed fact checks.
 
NYPost as a source.....

rightcenter011.png



Do me! Do me!

How is Huff Po?
 
When you are reduced to citing the Huffington Post's article which relies on the "reportage" of a British tabloid for proof, you have sunk about as low as you can go.
All I was asking is theb huff po rag as biased in the same way as the original article, based on the same criteria?

If they are, we can dismiss them as biased.

Is this the case?
 
All I was asking is theb huff po rag as biased in the same way as the original article, based on the same criteria?

If they are, we can dismiss them as biased.

Is this the case?
I don’t expect RV will answer. But here you go.

Overall, we rate HuffPost Left-Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that favor the left. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to failed fact checks and the promotion of pseudoscience.
 
I don’t expect RV will answer. But here you go.

Overall, we rate HuffPost Left-Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that favor the left. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to failed fact checks and the promotion of pseudoscience.
Thank you! I'm sure they just haven't had time to respond.

As long as left leaning and right leaning news are reporting the same thing, I tend to accept the general facts.

@Rogue Valley will appreciate your post.
 
At lease one wife got raped, and her hair pulled out. Oh, wait...that wasn't before the marriage, that was during.
Well I can't imagine voting for any candidate who accepted that treatment of women.

I would vote against them. And have done so.

I'm sure Democrats have no such reservations, but they are allowed their opinions. I will continue to strongly disagree.
 
All I was asking is theb huff po rag as biased in the same way as the original article, based on the same criteria?

If they are, we can dismiss them as biased.

Is this the case?
The same source ranks "The Daily Mail" as

1728572667526.webp

and ranks the "Huffington Post" as

1728572891538.webp
Personally I wouldn't trust either source to be overly concerned about anything other than extracting the maximum amount of revenue to be garnered by sensationalizing totally irrelevant matters.
 
The same source ranks "The Daily Mail" as


and ranks the "Huffington Post" as

Personally I wouldn't trust either source to be overly concerned about anything other than extracting the maximum amount of revenue to be garnered by sensationalizing totally irrelevant matters.
But if they both report the same thing, and are wildly different in perspective... doesn't that make a strong point,?
 
But if they both report the same thing, and are wildly different in perspective... doesn't that make a strong point,?
Indeed, however there are 'slight' difference between
  1. "A" says "'B' did 'X' to me.
  2. "C" says "'A' said 'B' did 'X' to them."
  3. "D" says "'C' said that "'B' said that 'A' did 'X' to 'B'."; and
  4. "E" says "'D' said that 'C' said that 'A' said that 'A' did 'X' to 'B'."
The first is what is known as "evidence".
The second is what is known as "hearsay".
The third is what is known as "double hearsay".
The fourth is what is known as "Counsel, do you really think that I am so dumb that I am going to allow that testimony?".

Mind you, in this case, the "strong case" is that both of the media outlets have turned off their "Click Bait Filters".
 
Well, you appear to think that his conduct is indicative of his fitness to hold public office
You're the only one implying that. I certainly haven't.

, so I was wondering exactly what public office he was running for.

On the other hand, maybe you can refresh my memory of what the next door neighbor's second cousin's former girlfriend's third grade best friend's brother's stepfather's grandfathers of both Ms Harris and Mr Trump did - because I am sure that what they did has some existential bearing on the fitness of Ms Harris and Mr Trump to hold public office.
Whoever that is isn't out campaigning as the prototype for "new masculinity" in an effort to get Kamala elected.
 
Back
Top Bottom