- Joined
- Jan 25, 2013
- Messages
- 37,072
- Reaction score
- 17,954
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Well, none of this stuff about Hillary is attributed to him, or anyone, for that matter. So...?
So - the people who believe that about Trump (which I do) ..... do you also believe this about Hillary?
Secret Service agents: Hillary is a nightmare to work with | New York Post
What stuff about Hillary?
Attributed to whom?
Byrne?
He wrote a book in which Hillary figured prominently.
You should try reading an exchange before jumping in on it, so you might know what the hell you're disagreeing with. I am not going to read the last half dozen posts Josie and I have exchanged for you. They're right there.
Writers don't always have to work. They often, like Schwartz, collect royalties. Incidentally, with the Trump campaign pushing Art of The Deal, Schwartz has been collecting more royalties.
I'm talking about Gary Byrne. He was a Uniformed Secret Service officer stationed outside the Oval Office. He testified in the Bill Clinton affair.
So - the people who believe that about Trump (which I do) ..... do you also believe this about Hillary?
Secret Service agents: Hillary is a nightmare to work with | New York Post
Broke writer tries to get paid gigs talking about Trump.
I see a lawsuit in his future. I seriously doubt he wrote anything official or authorized by and about Trump without a Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure Agreement, which he probably just broke wide open. I know I would sue the hell out of him, and from what I've seen, Trump isn't afraid to utilize the protections of the law.
The guy is a pig. An ungrateful pig. If he thinks so ****ing bad about the man, he shouldn't have taken his money to write the man's book. Again, what an ungrateful pig.
But, maybe that's just me. And, to repeat for the umpteen time, I don't like Trump at all. But, what this guy is doing is unethical and just plain wrong.
Perhaps he is looking for the limelight?
Perhaps he will have his ass sued off, but if you have nothing, that ass ain't worth much.
Perhaps because he spent 18 months with Trump, knowing what was deleted from the book, what was not permitted to be printed, he took a stand?
Broke writer tries to get paid gigs talking about Trump.
I see a lawsuit in his future. I seriously doubt he wrote anything official or authorized by and about Trump without a Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure Agreement, which he probably just broke wide open. I know I would sue the hell out of him, and from what I've seen, Trump isn't afraid to utilize the protections of the law.
The guy is a pig. An ungrateful pig. If he thinks so ****ing bad about the man, he shouldn't have taken his money to write the man's book. Again, what an ungrateful pig.
But, maybe that's just me. And, to repeat for the umpteen time, I don't like Trump at all. But, what this guy is doing is unethical and just plain wrong.
I saw references to lesbianism, cosmetic surgery, being difficult person, etc..
I think I wasn't being unreasonable to ask what YOU were referring to.
You tell me what and I'll tell you what Byrne said he saw, if anything.
I sort of feel that Trump will be a disaster but not on a nuclear scale. But, we'll see.
I'm afraid we just might.
Bubba, I haven't read the ghostwriter's book about Trump - I was posting about reading Byrne's book Crisis of Character which talks about the Clintons during their time in the White House. Apologies if I was mistakenly off-topic...
I have faith that my fellow Americans will not elect a twitter-bait buffoon but rather choose a a more measured, emotionally stable policy wonk. And, yes, I notice the irony that the woman is the latter while the man acts like he is the one who needs meds.
So?
Schwartz of all people would know what Trump is really like (besides his family) since he had to write Trump's life story and in order to do that he had to get to know him as a person.
Status: unproven.
Secret Service Opinions of Clintons : snopes.com
Not surprised. When I searched this, the first few links were all conservative rags with terrible journalistic reputations. The very next one was Snopes.
30 years ago.
Things change in 30 years like raising children and growing up.
Does one mans opinion weigh more than another?
Why believe one while dismissing the other?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?