- Joined
- Jan 8, 2018
- Messages
- 10,940
- Reaction score
- 2,426
- Location
- God's country
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Yeah, he should have said "actually"...
Yeah, he should have said "actually"...Every time someone say "obviously," what follows is a lie.
Actually there is no American institution that remotely approaches the power and deadliness of the KGB. Not the CIA or FBI even combined.Delicious tears.
None of those three "very important elements" are evident here. These seem to be nothing but baseless assertionsThe fairy tale says; if the glass slipper fits then it must be Cinderella.Right? Right!
So since the KGB slipper obviously fits the FBI, it must be the new American KGB by default!
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Now back to the business at hand...
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Obtaining a Warrant.
(1) In General. After receiving an affidavit or other information, a magistrate judge—or if authorized by Rule 41(b), a judge of a state court of record—must issue the warrant if there is probable cause to search for and seize a person or property or to install and use a tracking device.
(2) Requesting a Warrant in the Presence of a Judge.
(A) Warrant on an Affidavit. When a federal law enforcement officer or an attorney for the government presents an affidavit in support of a warrant, the judge may require the affiant to appear personally and may examine under oath the affiant and any witness the affiant produces.
(B) Warrant on Sworn Testimony. The judge may wholly or partially dispense with a written affidavit and base a warrant on sworn testimony if doing so is reasonable under the circumstances.
(C) Recording Testimony. Testimony taken in support of a warrant must be recorded by a court reporter or by a suitable recording device, and the judge must file the transcript or recording with the clerk, along with any affidavit.
(3) Requesting a Warrant by Telephonic or Other Reliable Electronic Means. In accordance with Rule 4.1, a magistrate judge may issue a warrant based on information communicated by telephone or other reliable electronic means.
Take into consideration the following three very important elements:
(1) The blatant in-your-face actions and inactions of the FBI exposes its obvious political bias and true agenda.
(2) And these obviously baseless warrants are fabricated and served by radical leftists whose only agenda is politics & power.
(3) And this latest FBI warrant served on our former President Trump is an attempt to prevent his GOP candidacy for POTUS in 2024.
How could seven chaotic years of meaningless testimonies & evidence possibly justify this continuous flow of warrantless warrants?
But there is one thing that is an undeniable fact.....Donald Trump absolutely scares the democrats to death!
isn't the director of the FBI a Trump appointee.......he is and as such political bias is out the window......the man is doing his jobThe fairy tale says; if the glass slipper fits then it must be Cinderella.Right? Right!
So since the KGB slipper obviously fits the FBI, it must be the new American KGB by default!
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Now back to the business at hand...
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Obtaining a Warrant.
(1) In General. After receiving an affidavit or other information, a magistrate judge—or if authorized by Rule 41(b), a judge of a state court of record—must issue the warrant if there is probable cause to search for and seize a person or property or to install and use a tracking device.
(2) Requesting a Warrant in the Presence of a Judge.
(A) Warrant on an Affidavit. When a federal law enforcement officer or an attorney for the government presents an affidavit in support of a warrant, the judge may require the affiant to appear personally and may examine under oath the affiant and any witness the affiant produces.
(B) Warrant on Sworn Testimony. The judge may wholly or partially dispense with a written affidavit and base a warrant on sworn testimony if doing so is reasonable under the circumstances.
(C) Recording Testimony. Testimony taken in support of a warrant must be recorded by a court reporter or by a suitable recording device, and the judge must file the transcript or recording with the clerk, along with any affidavit.
(3) Requesting a Warrant by Telephonic or Other Reliable Electronic Means. In accordance with Rule 4.1, a magistrate judge may issue a warrant based on information communicated by telephone or other reliable electronic means.
Take into consideration the following three very important elements:
(1) The blatant in-your-face actions and inactions of the FBI exposes its obvious political bias and true agenda.
(2) And these obviously baseless warrants are fabricated and served by radical leftists whose only agenda is politics & power.
(3) And this latest FBI warrant served on our former President Trump is an attempt to prevent his GOP candidacy for POTUS in 2024.
How could seven chaotic years of meaningless testimonies & evidence possibly justify this continuous flow of warrantless warrants?
But there is one thing that is an undeniable fact.....Donald Trump absolutely scares the democrats to death!
good Lord man.....that's about the craziest post I have seen.......I assume it is satireThe current period in American history seems familiar to the early 1930s when H*tl*r was preparing to seize control.
I remember seeing photos of Nazi members in the German legislature turning their backs whenever a non-Nazi member went to the rostrum to speak.
Will we see Democrats in the House & Senate turn their backs on Republican speakers?
It seems that all democracies eventually come to an end.
The Democratic Party has decided to disqualify the Honorable Donald J. Trump.
If they succeed, NO Republican should run.
Of course, I hope that the American people will peacefully resist the Democratic dictatorship.
(I expect Canada and Mexico to close their borders to the hordes of American refugees.)
You’re so adorable with your little memes. You should send them to Trump so he has something to read in prison.The entire Dem/lib/progressive establishment is scared shitless over the orange one. He’s stands against everything they believe. View attachment 67405802
Hahahahahahahah ya boy Donny got caught breaking the law but you just GOTTA whine about Biden somehow. So you go with the generic insults.Bonehead Biden just can't stop the stupid.
why are you trying to run cover for a thief?The fairy tale says; if the glass slipper fits then it must be Cinderella.Right? Right!
So since the KGB slipper obviously fits the FBI, it must be the new American KGB by default!
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Now back to the business at hand...
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Obtaining a Warrant.
(1) In General. After receiving an affidavit or other information, a magistrate judge—or if authorized by Rule 41(b), a judge of a state court of record—must issue the warrant if there is probable cause to search for and seize a person or property or to install and use a tracking device.
(2) Requesting a Warrant in the Presence of a Judge.
(A) Warrant on an Affidavit. When a federal law enforcement officer or an attorney for the government presents an affidavit in support of a warrant, the judge may require the affiant to appear personally and may examine under oath the affiant and any witness the affiant produces.
(B) Warrant on Sworn Testimony. The judge may wholly or partially dispense with a written affidavit and base a warrant on sworn testimony if doing so is reasonable under the circumstances.
(C) Recording Testimony. Testimony taken in support of a warrant must be recorded by a court reporter or by a suitable recording device, and the judge must file the transcript or recording with the clerk, along with any affidavit.
(3) Requesting a Warrant by Telephonic or Other Reliable Electronic Means. In accordance with Rule 4.1, a magistrate judge may issue a warrant based on information communicated by telephone or other reliable electronic means.
Take into consideration the following three very important elements:
(1) The blatant in-your-face actions and inactions of the FBI exposes its obvious political bias and true agenda.
(2) And these obviously baseless warrants are fabricated and served by radical leftists whose only agenda is politics & power.
(3) And this latest FBI warrant served on our former President Trump is an attempt to prevent his GOP candidacy for POTUS in 2024.
How could seven chaotic years of meaningless testimonies & evidence possibly justify this continuous flow of warrantless warrants?
But there is one thing that is an undeniable fact.....Donald Trump absolutely scares the democrats to death!
She's correct. Bad men get their homes raided by the feds. She'll calm down once the orange man is in an orange jumper.
But did Trump have the power to declassify documents while he was in office. Politifact reluctantly admits that he did, even if DT didn't dot all the i's and cross all the t's.A private citizen is keeping boxes of sensitive classified documents in his home. He has been asked repeatedly to cooperate and return them to the government. He refused.
Imagine there's a totally nonpartisan law enforcement agency. What specific actions do YOU think such an organization should take to resolve the situation?
Risch said, "The minute the president speaks about it to someone, he has the ability to declassify anything at any time without any process."
We found broad agreement that a president, using powers granted by the Constitution, is able to declassify essentially anything. However, experts added that Risch’s comment was not entirely on point for the particular situation involving Trump.
In this case, it appears Trump didn’t actually use his declassification power before talking to the Russian officials, and just because Trump’s actions were legal doesn’t necessarily mean they were wise. These caveats add nuance to analyses of what Trump did.
The statement is accurate but needs clarification and additional information, so we rate it Mostly True.
Not going to happen, but it might be a fun and decent reason to have a party if it did happen.Soon he will live rent-free in prison.
And you righties will melt down again.
Aww he’ll love that one! Do you think he’ll be able to cover his whole body with the orange face paint and forgo the jumpsuit?
Good think he lacks the coherence or passion to write about his Struggle.Aww he’ll love that one! Do you think he’ll be able to cover his whole body with the orange face paint and forgo the jumpsuit?
Good think he lacks the coherence or passion to write about his Struggle.
He ain’t going no where near a prison unless it’s to visit China Joe and Hunter.Soon he will live rent-free in prison.
And you righties will melt down again.
Trump handpicked the Director of the FBI. If he was a Democratic sleeper agent, then Trump didn't hire the best people.
View attachment 67405697
FFS even if he had the right, he didn't exercise it. We're dealing with highly sensitive classified info, so dotting the i's and crossing the t's is a COMPLETELY NECESSARY STEP. Without that step, it remains classified and therefore illegal for some random private citizen to possess.But did Trump have the power to declassify documents while he was in office. Politifact reluctantly admits that he did, even if DT didn't dot all the i's and cross all the t's.
The fact that with in ~ 12 hours Hillary had already had Hats/ Merch ready to be sold let's the people with Brains know that theyThe fairy tale says; if the glass slipper fits then it must be Cinderella.Right? Right!
So since the KGB slipper obviously fits the FBI, it must be the new American KGB by default!
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Now back to the business at hand...
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Obtaining a Warrant.
(1) In General. After receiving an affidavit or other information, a magistrate judge—or if authorized by Rule 41(b), a judge of a state court of record—must issue the warrant if there is probable cause to search for and seize a person or property or to install and use a tracking device.
(2) Requesting a Warrant in the Presence of a Judge.
(A) Warrant on an Affidavit. When a federal law enforcement officer or an attorney for the government presents an affidavit in support of a warrant, the judge may require the affiant to appear personally and may examine under oath the affiant and any witness the affiant produces.
(B) Warrant on Sworn Testimony. The judge may wholly or partially dispense with a written affidavit and base a warrant on sworn testimony if doing so is reasonable under the circumstances.
(C) Recording Testimony. Testimony taken in support of a warrant must be recorded by a court reporter or by a suitable recording device, and the judge must file the transcript or recording with the clerk, along with any affidavit.
(3) Requesting a Warrant by Telephonic or Other Reliable Electronic Means. In accordance with Rule 4.1, a magistrate judge may issue a warrant based on information communicated by telephone or other reliable electronic means.
Take into consideration the following three very important elements:
(1) The blatant in-your-face actions and inactions of the FBI exposes its obvious political bias and true agenda.
(2) And these obviously baseless warrants are fabricated and served by radical leftists whose only agenda is politics & power.
(3) And this latest FBI warrant served on our former President Trump is an attempt to prevent his GOP candidacy for POTUS in 2024.
How could seven chaotic years of meaningless testimonies & evidence possibly justify this continuous flow of warrantless warrants?
But there is one thing that is an undeniable fact.....Donald Trump absolutely scares the democrats to death!
The current period in American history seems familiar to the early 1930s when H*tl*r was preparing to seize control.
I remember seeing photos of Nazi members in the German legislature turning their backs whenever a non-Nazi member went to the rostrum to speak.
Will we see Democrats in the House & Senate turn their backs on Republican speakers?
I thought that the right liked the kgb.
He ain’t going no where near a prison unless it’s to visit China Joe and Hunter.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?