Unbeknownst
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2021
- Messages
- 555
- Reaction score
- 369
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
If abortion is the woman's right, as some believe, shouldn't it be the right of all women, not just all women with money? Or maybe you disagree.
If abortion is the woman's right, as some believe, shouldn't it be the right of all women, not just all women with money? Or maybe you disagree.
Well I'm in favor of universal healthcare...so...yes.If abortion is the woman's right, as some believe, shouldn't it be the right of all women, not just all women with money? Or maybe you disagree.
Abortion is a woman's right, simple legal fact. Having money just makes it easier to exercise that right.If abortion is the woman's right, as some believe, shouldn't it be the right of all women, not just all women with money? Or maybe you disagree.
If abortion is the woman's right, as some believe, shouldn't it be the right of all women, not just all women with money? Or maybe you disagree.
Abortion is a woman's right, simple legal fact. Having money just makes it easier to exercise that right.
The government should fund Planned Parenthood, not only because they sometimes serve as abortion providers, but also because historically, they have prevented more unwanted pregnancies than any other institution.If abortion is the woman's right, as some believe, shouldn't it be the right of all women, not just all women with money? Or maybe you disagree.
Actually abortion is not a right. That is the actual simple fact. Abortion is a decision and what is being argued is who has the right to make that decision.Abortion is a woman's right, simple legal fact. Having money just makes it easier to exercise that right.
Interesting comparison. Considering that a landlord has the right the evict tenets they do not want in their house. As a woman has the right to evict a tenet in her body that she does not want.Yep, owning (or renting) a home is a right. Having money just makes it easier to exercise that right.
What use is a right to a woman who is not pregnant? Only pregnant women have a right to decide whether they want an abortion or not. For every other women it is simply a hypothetical question.If abortion is the woman's right, as some believe, shouldn't it be the right of all women, not just all women with money? Or maybe you disagree.
It is not a right to own a car. it is simply legal to own a car.This is about as stupid as anything I've ever read here or anywhere.
It is my right to own a car. Do you feel the government should buy me one? Maybe the Lord?
Capitalism is at its worse when people think they should be able to profit from abortions. It is just a small step up from backyard butchers who use coathangers to perform an abortion.Well I'm in favor of universal healthcare...so...yes.
Interesting comparison. Considering that a landlord has the right the evict tenets they do not want in their house. As a woman has the right to evict a tenet in her body that she does not want.
The comparison was limited to public financing. Does the tenant have a right to e and that public funds be used to pay their rent?
Yes, in countries like mine welfare will pay some percentage of rent for those who cannot afford to pay it all themselves. And I along with the majority of people agree to this. Otherwise such subsidies would not have existed for the many decades that they have existed.
Your argument is based purely on being selfish.
Because you have a shitty political system that relies on slandering the opposition rather than concentrating on politics.That (bolded above) should be enough to change public policy. Why don’t state and/or local governments offer abortion subsidies?
Actually, abortion is a right, as the SCOTUS determined. A woman has the right to choose to have an abortion or not.Actually abortion is not a right. That is the actual simple fact. Abortion is a decision and what is being argued is who has the right to make that decision.
So you would deny that right if a woman can't afford it? I suggest you take a look at the 24th Amendment.Abortion is a woman's right, simple legal fact. Having money just makes it easier to exercise that right.
Strawman argument. Financial issues might affect a woman being able to get an abortion. It doesn't affect her right or choice to get one.So you would deny that right if a woman can't afford it? I suggest you take a look at the 24th Amendment.
Key word there is "choose". Abortion is not a right it is merely a medical procedure. the right as you point out is the right to choose.Actually, abortion is a right, as the SCOTUS determined. A woman has the right to choose to have an abortion or not.
Choosing is the right. Choose to have an abortion or not. And since the woman is the one getting pregnant, she can choose to have an abortion .Key word there is "choose". Abortion is not a right it is merely a medical procedure. the right as you point out is the right to choose.
The argument is who has the right to choose, not whether abortion itself is a right.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?