That's nice, completely irrelevant though.
Why you people feel the need to proclaim that homosexuals reproduce, with the opposite sex, is just strange. We know that. That's how the species survives, reproduction. Homosexuality is not part of that equation.
Perhaps I didn't word it well enough. Heterosexual sex is essential to the continuation of the species. Doesn't mean all people must reproduce, but a significant number must to continue the species. Homosexual sex? Could disappear tomorrow forever, would not hurt the species at all, it would go on without missing a beat. So, are they the same? Certainly not. Is a homsexual union the same as a heterosexual marriage? Again, no.
Typical liberal logic: “if it doesn't agree with me it's biased, irrelevant, hateful, bigoted, mean, exploitive, ignorant, narrow-minded, unintelligent, retarded, hitlerian, racist, homophobic, xenophobic, masochistic, chauvinistic, maniacal, evil, depraved, smelly, fat, unhealthy, unhelpful, insensitive, individualistic, horrible, detestable, vile, odious, terrible, unbearable, intolerable, insufferable, revolting, repulsive, disgusting, sickening, ghastly, filthy, sordid, horrible, nauseating, repellent, prejudiced, unfair, partial, nasty, atrocious, ghastly, dreadful, shocking…
It’s never, “Oh, somebody has a view different from mine? I wonder what it might be? Perhaps I should inquire of this fine, obviously-intelligent individual exactly what his opinion is and understand the subject as he see it and perhaps even engage in some civilized conversation that may bring us both closer to some objective truth?”
But that’ll never happen ‘cause all Libs know how to do is destroy anything that does not mimic them.
And you, sir! You call yourself “civilized”?
Nothing could be further from the truth!
:mrgreen:
Yes. That's why we have lots of laws like "you can't take your clothes and make someone's eyes bleed" and "you can't have wild monkey sex with a real wild monkey". It's disgusting. Lots of people don't want you doing that shyte in their neighborhood. Or state. Or country.
Nowhere did I post that marriage is only for children, as I said. Twisting the facts, misleading, and out right lies. I'm all too familiar with the left's tactics.
Here is the McClatchy-Marist Poll from just a few days ago (8/14).
WASHINGTON: Sea change: Americans revising opinions on gays, poll finds | Washington | McClatchy DC
54% support SSM in this poll... again, the percentage has been rising consistently over the past 10 years. One thing of note is that those 60 and older are the one age group that doesn't support SSM... so when they die off...
Another very interesting poll.
Regular people don't need to know how other folks perform sex acts.
Push that debauchery, CC. All it shows is what percentage of Americans are Biblically-challenged heathens.
Regular people don't need to know how other folks perform sex acts.
Yeah, I wonder what percentage of children are born through normal means vs. artificial? I'm going to guess about 99.9999999%. I may be off by a digit. The remainder is not enough to populate a small village, let alone the human race. It's ridiculous to even think artificial means could replace nature's method.
In 2012, more than 3.95 million babies were born, the Centers for Disease Control reports (PDF). That's below what demographers call the "replacement level," the level at which the generation can replace itself. Of those births, IVF treatments account for about 1.5% of all babies born in the United States that year.
You can call it a marriage, but it's not. It's different, not the same as a marriage.
That applies to you as well, now doesn't it? Marriage is just for children? Not sure where I proclaimed that.
You can call it a marriage, but it's not. It's different, not the same as a marriage.
We limit a person to only being allowed one person as their named legal medical decision maker,...
Difference of opinion is ok (altho hey...what do you personally think of racist's opinions?) but it's the attempt to force such bigotry on others and deprive them of civil rights that most object to.
The bigots are deprived of nothing. Being offended is not protected at all.
What's different?
Do they not pay bills?
Do they not have a mortgage or car insurance?
Do they get a free roof instead of having to pay for it?
Do they not have to cook, clean, eat, wash dishes, clean clothes?
Do they not watch tv?
Do they never argue about finances, or who's going to run the vacuum cleaner?
What's different?
And, increasingly, gay couples have children....
And what percentage of those voters were over 40? Furthermore, that was back in 2005.
Recent pollings already show you've lost:
That's from April 2014.
Poll shows more Texans support same-sex marriage than oppose it - Lone Star Q
Maybe the children of gays are robots that do all the cooking, cleaning, working, and bill paying for the HOMO's ??????????
Do we? With a single spouse marriage that becomes obvious, but your statement, while you probably intended it to, does not limit itself to married individuals alone. How does medical decision work for a single adult child who's not designated one parent over the other and both disagree as to what is to happen, under the assumption of the adult being incapable of making that decision? Assume for the purpose of the question that the adult child never thought to get a medical PoA.
If you had religion you would know that is a BS statement. Spare me your condescension.Right and wrong are subjective.
If you had religion you would know that is a BS statement. Spare me your condescension.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?