- Joined
- Jul 31, 2005
- Messages
- 36,705
- Reaction score
- 17,867
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
Why is it inherently better, that election after election, only a handful of states make the decision?
You seem to think the elective college should be banned.So it is you who should be answering that question.
How is that objectively better.
Oh I know you can make lofty and long winded speeches about the “wise” founders and how just, amazing they were.
But I’ve always found the EC to be not good for this very reason.
Same with FPTP systems as well.
Proportional representation is what I actually think is best if we truly want the voice of the people heard.
But I don’t see how the tyranny of the cities is any different to the tyranny of Florida and Ohio, objectively speaking.
People who piss, bitch and moan about the electoral college tend to the ones upset that Commie-fornia and New York didn't get to elect Hillary.