• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Do you believe there should be limits on the President's power to issue pardons for federal crimes?

Do you believe there should be limits on the President's power to issue pardons for federal crimes?

  • Pardons should only be issued at the end of a President's term.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    65

lynnwinslow

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 16, 2025
Messages
2,531
Reaction score
3,929
Gender
Female
Under the U.S. Constitution, the President has the power to grant pardons for federal crimes. This poll asks your opinion on whether that power should be limited.
 
Not sure.
Should we tie the hands of future presidents because Trump has poor judgement and lacks restraint?
To be fair, Biden's last minute pardons were controversial as were many of Clinton's. Trump, as per usual, has thumbed his nose at norms. And a future President could do the same. Do you think it should be addressed?
 
Nobody forgot. That's the point. Do you have any opinion? Or do you not care as long as your side is in power?
I do not support presidential pardons.

Where were you when Biden issued them to his own family members and in a blanket fashion?
 
Not sure.
Should we tie the hands of future presidents because Trump has poor judgement and lacks restraint?

In my lifetime, Clinton, Biden, and now Trump have abused this power in corrupt and damaging ways.

I'd say the issue is systemic, vice being limited to one man, and likely to get worse as each new abuse sets new norms.
 
Under the U.S. Constitution, the President has the power to grant pardons for federal crimes. This poll asks your opinion on whether that power should be limited.

What's your opinion?
 
To be fair, Biden's last minute pardons were controversial as were many of Clinton's. Trump, as per usual, has thumbed his nose at norms. And a future President could do the same. Do you think it should be addressed?
Should an ethics based conflict of interest, subject to congress approval, be enacted?

Or did Trump set such standards for future presidents?
 
Should an ethics based conflict of interest, subject to congress approval, be enacted?

Or did Trump set such standards for future presidents?
It theory, adding some parameters to the pardon power seems like a good idea but I have no idea how that would be accomplished in this political environment.
 
Based on current trends, I think it should be abolished, I just forgot to click the answer. What's your opinion?

Glad I could job your memory! I think it definitely can and has been abused, but I wouldn't say that getting rid of that power altogether is the answer. I'd be for a limit to how many a president can issue.
 
I don't think they should but since they already have the power to do it, I don't find it realistic that we could set limits on pardons.
 
Not sure.
Should we tie the hands of future presidents because Trump has poor judgement and lacks restraint?
The American people chose Trump, they are capable of choosing more equally moronic and corrupt presidents in the future.
 
Under the U.S. Constitution, the President has the power to grant pardons for federal crimes. This poll asks your opinion on whether that power should be limited.
Just a reminder: Dear Leader is deliberately blowing past every check, balance and guardrail that limits his power, and Congress is abetting him. Meaning whatever constitutional or statutory limits you imagine putting on this power, it's not going to stop a wanna-be dictator from giving out illegal pardons anyway.
 
Under the U.S. Constitution, the President has the power to grant pardons for federal crimes. This poll asks your opinion on whether that power should be limited.
I don't have a problem with Presidents issuing pardons...as long as it is actually the President issuing them.
 
May I suggest that presidential pardons be similar to presidential vetoes?

A presidential veto is usually the end of a congressional bill, except in the event of a congressional veto override.

I think every presidential pardon (nomination) ought to get an up or down vote FROM BOTH HOUSES in a timely manner with a 2/3 majority in each house to quash the pardon.

This way, the president is not omnipotent, and congress critters have to go on the record, thereby being accountable to their constituents. Since a presidential pardon is in reality an act of mercy, every congressman and senator would have to decide if this is the hill they want to die on.

Of course, this would require a constitutional amendment, and I won't hold my breath.
 
I don't have a problem with Presidents issuing pardons...as long as it is actually the President issuing them.
Do you think there have been some Presidential pardons that were made without the President's input? If so, which ones?
 
Back
Top Bottom