• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Do you approve of Trump's plans for retribution?

I just can't wait for him to abolish the constitution, make liberals where a big L on their clothes and open the concentration camps.
How about the firing all the career civil servants, prosecutors and FBI agents who won't swear a loyalty oath to him over the Constitution?
 
Republicans better be wary too. He will go after anyone he perceives to be disloyal or an enemy.
Authoritarian's run out of bad guys to go after and start to eat their own.
Maga's have been warned, but they won't care until the retribution is turned on them.
But there will be no one left to give a squishy ****.
 
OK, I'll bite.

How will this supposed "retribution" manifest itself?
Good question. Trump could use the IRS. Reopen Biden's classified docs case. Bring back Obamagate. Lol.

Trump would have no one to answer to, so I'm sure there will be creative methods of retribution attempted. Whether whatever guardrails remain hold up, is another question.
 
Wonder if he'll start by making the government apologize to his law breaking supporters.



Will he'll go after Hillary, Obama and Biden soon after.



It's supposed to be the final battle according to him, right. :unsure:



How anyone can support his "plans" is beyond me.....

_94722772_mediaitem94722771.jpg




......unless you support demolishing just about everything. :rolleyes:

Ever notice how his supporters speak of him being against war as he draws his battle plans for right here at home.

Does he, or any of the J6's understand that a pardon comes with admission of guilt?
Jesus ****.
 
Trump has constantly mentioned two areas of retribution he means if he is elected. First against those who perceives as his enemies, i.e., anyone who does not agree with him. The second is against any media who he sees as not agreeing with him and his ideas. These include such as CBS and MSNBC as examples. So, do you approve of Trump's plans for retribution if elected?
That is the mentality and actions of a dictator. That alone should be a major red flag.
 
How about the firing all the career civil servants, prosecutors and FBI agents who won't swear a loyalty oath to him over the Constitution?
Lets take them out and shoot them on live TV. That will show them what for.
 

Do you approve of Trump's plans for retribution?​

Lies and misinformation. Trump has no plans for retribution.
 
He's joking, ain't he a laff ****ing riot?
I take MAGA statements at face value. When Donald says they’re eating the cats, I assume he actually believes it. When @DrewPaul advocates for violence as a form of retribution, I assume he believes it. When Marjorie insists that Democrats are steering hurricanes, I assume she believes it.
 
I just can't wait for him to abolish the constitution, make liberals where a big L on their clothes and open the concentration camps.
We know.
Next thing you know, some DP leftist will take your comment seriously....oh wait....
So? When people tell me who they are, I listen.
 
You underestimate the servile nature of the Trump voter.
They remind me of Hamas.



Martyrs and hostages. Yep. Hamas. MAGA = HAMAS
 
The difference being is that the people you're worried about are not leaders the Democrats. The actual leader of the Republican party, Donald Trump, referred to Pelosi and Schumer as the enemy from within and floated using the National Guard or the military get rid of them.
False equivalency logical fallacy.
I doubt dmpi really believes all that BS. Nobody's that gullible.
 
Trump has constantly mentioned two areas of retribution he means if he is elected. First against those who perceives as his enemies, i.e., anyone who does not agree with him. The second is against any media who he sees as not agreeing with him and his ideas. These include such as CBS and MSNBC as examples. So, do you approve of Trump's plans for retribution if elected?
Heck yea I do. I for one welcome our new Orange Overlords and will gratefully rat the rest of you out! 🤡
 
Trump has constantly mentioned two areas of retribution he means if he is elected. First against those who perceives as his enemies, i.e., anyone who does not agree with him. The second is against any media who he sees as not agreeing with him and his ideas. These include such as CBS and MSNBC as examples. So, do you approve of Trump's plans for retribution if elected?
I voted for someone I figured would at least try to clean out the swamp in 2016. Since then I've seen how that swamp is more like a ****ing ocean. We need to clean our oceans and we need to clean our bureaucratic swamp. That needs to start TODAY and it doesn't matter whether it's Trump that does it or someone else but it has GOT to happen.

For the next week I'll be on the phone contacting clients to inform them that, if they have an active entity registration with their state (corporation, LLC, etc.) they MUST register with the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network or be subject to a $10,000 fine. This applies even if the registered entity has NEVER done any business. If it's on the books then they have to provide "Beneficial Ownership Information" or suffer a HUGE penalty. Why do they have to do this? Well, because the powers that be in government have decided that all business entities are probable sources of money laundering. This registration will allow pretty much any government agency to obtain personal bank information and start investigating EVERYONE associated with most businesses. Trump actually vetoed this action back in 2020 but congress overrode the veto which means that Republicans as well as Democrats decided this was a good idea. Our government should NEVER have this kind of power unless there is probable cause to investigate but establishment politicians and bureaucrats on both sides of the aisle thought they knew better. Unless we stop government abuses we WILL lose our most basic freedoms and THAT is why I will vote for Trump a week from Tuesday.
 

Do you approve of Trump's plans for retribution?

Oh yes. I do. I really do.

Of course it is 9 years later, and he still only has "concepts of plans" to replace the PPACA, as promised on day one back in the 2016 campaign.

I really imagine Donny will be way too busy golfing and grifting off any second term, to actually put any REVENGE AGENDA into gear any time in a second term if GOD FORBID he should gain one.

I mean, we are still waiting on his Infrastructure Plan, 9 years on, and he left the "big beautiful border wall" unfinished, where he had only accomplished erecting about 50 miles worth where none had existed before. Remember, as a candidate in 2016 he at first talked about erecting his "big beautiful wall" along the 2,000 miles of our Southern Border, but that plan almost immediately fell be the wayside as he kept scaling back how many miles of wall he would build.

When he supposedly shut down the Nation for Covid he only actually partially shut it down and only then way after hundreds of thousands had already flown in from Covid threat areas.

Oh, he brags a good brag, no doubt about that, if he can stay away from weaving, but he has a totally dismal track record of actually accomplishing his big ideas and promises.

So I am not too worried about Trumpian Retribution.

The man is a font of political promise and a dearth of political delivery.
 
Trump is proving himself to be dysfunctional, foolish, and incompetent. He is so embarrassing his own followers avoid him. By any measure, Harris should be winning this election easily. She is not, and there is a reason for that.

“Great presidents?” Trump said. “Lincoln was probably a great president, although I’ve always said, why wasn’t that settled? You know, I’m a guy that—it doesn’t make sense we had a Civil War…. You’d almost say, like, why wasn’t that [settled]? As an example, Ukraine would have never happened, and Russia, if I were president. Israel would have never happened; October 7 would have never happened, as you know.”

This was Trump's reply to a ten-year old.

A voter named Ramiro González raised concerns about Trump’s inaction on Jan. 6. Trump responded, “Some of those people went down to the Capitol peacefully and patriotically. Nothing done wrong at all. Nothing done wrong. Action was taken. Strong action. Ashli Babbitt was killed,” he said, referring to one individual who was killed after entering the Capitol. “Nobody was killed. There were no guns down there. We didn’t have guns. The others had guns, but we didn’t have guns. … But that was a day of love.”

On Jan. 6, 2021, within thirty-six hours six people died: one was shot by Capitol Police, another died of a drug overdose, three died of natural causes, and a police officer died after being assaulted by rioters. Many people were injured, including 174 police officers.

Asked if there had been phone calls between he an Putin after he left office, Trump said, “I don’t comment on that, But I will tell you that if I did, it’s a smart thing. If I’m friendly with people, if I can have a relationship with people, that’s a good thing and not a bad thing in terms of a country.”
“They’re eating the dogs. They’re eating the cats. They’re eating the pets of the people that live there,” Trump.

"Former President Donald J. Trump declared himself the “father of I.V.F.” at a town-hall event Tuesday focused on women’s issues,"
Times.

There is much more. This is just in the last ten days.

“The polls — public and private — are closer in this election than any I have ever seen,” said Dan Pfeiffer, a former aide to Barack Obama. “Everything is within the margin of error.

So, why is it a dysfunctional Republican candidate for President isn't losing handily?

Because Harris is a black woman.

In 2016, a highly experienced woman -- First Lady for eight years, New York Senator, secretary of state -- ran against the incompetent, inexperienced Trump. Hillary Clinton lost, too.
 
Does he, or any of the J6's understand that a pardon comes with admission of guilt?
Jesus ****.

Cult leader is proud of them being guilty though......

37721590-9139059-Vice_President_Pence_was_quick_to_denounce_the_mob_that_ransacke-a-83_1610480144025.jpg


......claiming they are all victims of (the government) lawfare......

200415-coronavirus-protesters-business-ohio-one-time-use-only-se-458p.jpg


.....not sure one needs to be a upstanding citizen or able to cast a ballot in order to participate in the maga movement......

e9c4999a78428c63bbc30e79d3cb9ac85a7f2322.jpg


......could even be quite the opposite actually. :rolleyes:






He would prosecute those who stopped his J6 mob. 😵‍💫
 
Last edited:
I voted for someone I figured would at least try to clean out the swamp in 2016. Since then I've seen how that swamp is more like a ****ing ocean. We need to clean our oceans and we need to clean our bureaucratic swamp. That needs to start TODAY and it doesn't matter whether it's Trump that does it or someone else but it has GOT to happen.

For the next week I'll be on the phone contacting clients to inform them that, if they have an active entity registration with their state (corporation, LLC, etc.) they MUST register with the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network or be subject to a $10,000 fine. This applies even if the registered entity has NEVER done any business. If it's on the books then they have to provide "Beneficial Ownership Information" or suffer a HUGE penalty. Why do they have to do this? Well, because the powers that be in government have decided that all business entities are probable sources of money laundering. This registration will allow pretty much any government agency to obtain personal bank information and start investigating EVERYONE associated with most businesses. Trump actually vetoed this action back in 2020 but congress overrode the veto which means that Republicans as well as Democrats decided this was a good idea. Our government should NEVER have this kind of power unless there is probable cause to investigate but establishment politicians and bureaucrats on both sides of the aisle thought they knew better. Unless we stop government abuses we WILL lose our most basic freedoms and THAT is why I will vote for Trump a week from Tuesday.
Mind boggling that you would suggest voting for Trump is the way to curb/address abuses of power.

In a democracy, the greatest abuse of power imaginable is attempting to subvert the will of the people to maintain power for yourself. And that is exactly what Trump did. Illegally.

Appointing Al Capone to run the Tax Fraud division of the IRS wouldn't be any dumber than tasking Trump with the job of "draining the swamp" and curbing power abuses in DC. He IS the swamp.
 
Mind boggling that you would suggest voting for Trump is the way to curb/address abuses of power.

In a democracy, the greatest abuse of power imaginable is attempting to subvert the will of the people to maintain power for yourself. And that is exactly what Trump did. Illegally.

Appointing Al Capone to run the Tax Fraud division of the IRS wouldn't be any dumber than tasking Trump with the job of "draining the swamp" and curbing power abuses in DC. He IS the swamp.
Trump didn't do a damned thing compared to the NeverTrumpers that organized the entirety of the intelligence services against both a candidate and a sitting president with the purpose of nullifying his election. They falsified documents, concocted accusations out of whole cloth, established an inquisition to prosecute him for crimes he never committed and then, after he was out of office, started to go after him with the "justice" system in ways we have never seen before. The abuses of government against one guy because people didn't like him, politically, is the most egregious abuse of power I have ever heard of outside certain third world governments.
 
Back
Top Bottom