No, it isn't about that. You created the thread to talk about how Jews control the American media. That's a very different topic.
I don't doubt it, but you treat everyone as if they had no critical faculties.
There are many interpretations, all of them however are replete with ideological baggage. Your ideological baggage is causing me serious concern.
What France and Britain did out of weakness has very little bearing on what Hitler's régime did out of their perceived strength. You appear to be using the weak positions of France and Britain to justify the expansionist ambitions of Nazi Germany. No one other than Hitler and his cohorts were to blame for his expansionism and imperialist ambitions.
You see what differently. I just agreed with you that rearmament had (temporary) economic benefits for Germany.
Yes, you did. I was just a bit stunned at the way in which you appear to have exonerated the Nazi régime from all fault for the outbreak of WWII, except for the silly Aryan mythology bit. That was the 'wow!' factor.
None of course. What a strange question.
It is one and the same by which I mean that Oliver Stone attributes the false oversimplification of history, in particular the demonizing of Germans and the over emphasis and continual recounting of the Holocaust to be due to the influence of Jewish control of the media.
This thread is sufficient proof to me that popular American culture has completely and repeatedly misinformed the public about historical truth and the media is largely to blame.
I have no ideological baggage. I am non-political.
Come now; the English and the French were big boys. They knew the Versailles Treaty was dead in the water.
This world domination narrative is way overplayed in that it misunderstands the German plan to unite all ethnic Germans and destroy Communism in Europe, making Lebensraum from Russia. There is reason to believe that Hitler wanted the British Empire to remain a sphere of influence in the world. None of this is explored in te American media.
You asserted that German growth was unsustainable. I do not believe this but we will never know.
The Aryan nonsense was an important part of the Nazi myth. I do not believe it is correct to blame WWII on Germany. Perhaps we are still too close to events to expect objective analysis, epecially from the American media.
I think this thread shows that clearly you are highly politically motivated.
If you don't recognise that as a political statement then we'd better leave the conversation there. You are clearly way out on the fringe of historical analysis and political ideology.
We will never know. I suppose Germany would have become the leading economy in Europe, a leader, so to speak, of a European Union.
It is possible to be committed to historical accuracy without being political. The truth is rarely black and white. Then, of course, everyone knows that it is the victors who get to tell the official narrative. Let's hope the scholars will, in time, redress the balance.
There is reason to believe, had Germany won the war against the Soviet Union, that attitudes over time could have changed. The initial solution to the Jewish Problem was expulsion from the Reich. Death camps were not built until two-and-a-half years after the English and French declared war on Germany, the United States had entered the war, and troops were fighting hard in Russia. Plausibly, a homeland for Jews would have been established in Madagascar or Palestine and there would have been no Final Solution. The Roma would have been forced to settle, perhaps in Romania, and quit their nomadic culture. Poles at first would have had no right of residence in the Reich and subject to the Generalgouvernement as a laboring class and, in time, might have been Aryanized, so to speak. This might surprise you but, being gay was illegal in the USA right up to 2003! In many Protestant U.S. states today, gays cannot marry! Back in pre-war Germany, homosexuality was an issue with regard to a perceived decadent culture of flamboyant effeminate or girly types such as was common in some Berlin night clubs of the Weimar Republic. It was believed that a good dose of work camp experience would teach them some manners. You might be shocked to learn that Communists were persecuted in the USA even after WWII, some executed and others in Hollywood blacklisted. Americans waged war in Viet Nam for years against Communists and have been blockading tiny Communist Cuba for decades. Try googling "Communism in USA". Ha! Right enough, Communism would have been proscribed in the Third Reich. Some religious cults were also banned, such as Jehovah Witnesses and active membership that targeted brainwashing of youth would have incurred a spell in a work camp. Today, Scientology is banned as such a dangerous cult in Germany. Traditional Catholicism and the Evangelic Church were well established and likely would have remained so in the Reich. After the defeat of the Soviet Union who knows what would have happened with Russian POWs? They might have been treated as German POWs were in the Soviet Union. Trying to see into a future that never existed can be interesting but must remain the subject of fanciful novels.
Had there been no perceived Jewish Problem, there would have been no need for various solutions, not even the Final Solution.
The assumption of your question is false; I do not "buy into Nazi ideology". I am non-political, I should have mentioned.
We all know that the Nazis were racist scum. That caused the perception. There was no need to kill millions of innocent people. Why are you defending Hitler and his cronies?