None of these measures appear to address the underlying issue I see, which is healthcare being a for-profit industry.
What we need is a solution or set of solutions that creates a situation where, if someone who resides in our nation is sick, they can be absolutely sure that if they reach a location providing care, they will get care for the health issue they are having, and not face unreasonable financial costs as a result.
Ideally, this would mean any and all necessary care is free and paid for entirely by taxes, IMO.
As for the policy guidelines you propose:
I do not understand option 1. Does companies purchasing health insurance for all employees somehow increasing prices? Why would forbidding it change things? How
I think option 2 is trying to make healthcare providers show their books so we know how much profit they are making? Please clarify. Maybe not exactly that.
The issue I have with option 3 is that forbidding service should not be on the table as an option, at all.
I'm not sure allowing purchasing health insurance from in another state would clash with regulations in the state you live in. How would this reduce costs?
HSA's only help if you have the money to contribute to them, and some idea what your costs will be. It also does nothing to lower the costs, just makes paying them less impactful on a budget.
For point 6, are you saying we need to cut down on the number of lawsuits healthcare providers face, because they are driving up their costs and thus their prices? Might be feasible, depending how it's done.
Point 7 is all well and good, but you run into the issue where food deserts and small budgets mean good diets are unaffordable.