- Joined
- Dec 3, 2009
- Messages
- 52,009
- Reaction score
- 33,944
- Location
- The Golden State
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
[h=1]WASHINGTON — The Office of the Director of National Intelligence will no longer offer in-person briefings to congressional intelligence committees about election security and foreign election interference, according to a congressional official briefed on the matter.[/h]
source
We can't have Congress briefed on foreign interference. They just might leak information about that interference and get people all upset again. No collusion! No collusion! Don't need to worry about Russian interference as there was no collusion, absolutely no collusion at all!
You can thank Adam Schiff.
source
We can't have Congress briefed on foreign interference. They just might leak information about that interference and get people all upset again. No collusion! No collusion! Don't need to worry about Russian interference as there was no collusion, absolutely no collusion at all!
They "just might leak (classified) information"?
Wrong.
They "will" leak classified information. It's what they do.
We clearly can't trust Congress. Might as well disband them and let Trump rule alone, right? I'm sure he'd like that.
Nah...don't get all hyperbole on me. That extreme isn't necessary.
Just vote in people who are interested in the rule of law and working for the people...while abiding by the law.
So, no more presidents who surround themselves with criminals? Sounds like a plan to me.
Nah...don't get all hyperbole on me. That extreme isn't necessary.
Just vote in people who are interested in the rule of law and working for the people...while abiding by the law.
Yep, that’s why we need Joe
We are talking about Congress...but yeah...sure.
It's refreshing to have an honest administration after enduring eight years of Obama and Democrat corruption.
Right.
Joe worked for two of the biggest classified info leakers in the US: Congress and the Obama administration.
If he didn't know what was going on then, what makes you think he'll know what's going on next year?
Right.
Joe worked for two of the biggest classified info leakers in the US: Congress and the Obama administration.
If he didn't know what was going on then, what makes you think he'll know what's going on next year?
Okay, prove it.
Let me know when the Barr DOJ investigations start filing warrants for arrest of Obama personnel. Don't hold your breath.
One has already been indicted, plead guilty and is awaiting sentence.
More to come.
Lies.
What "OBAMA personnel" was indicted and plead guilty?
Kevin Clinesmith
A low-level FBI lawyer position is not in any presidential administration.
You lie so blatantly and so badly. :lol:
Wanna try again?
source
We can't have Congress briefed on foreign interference. They just might leak information about that interference and get people all upset again. No collusion! No collusion! Don't need to worry about Russian interference as there was no collusion, absolutely no collusion at all!
1. He was not a "low-level FBI lawyer". He was responsible for ensuring that the FISA application was supported by the Woods file.
2. He was also under orders from his superior to ensure that Page was not involved with the CIA.
As I said...more to come.
We cant bother to read beyond the headlines and liberal media interpretation. We might just get to actual facts and learn whats really going on. Look, a russian!
READ: DNI John Ratcliffe's letter to Congress on election security briefings - CNNPolitics
"In the last
few months alone, the IC, in conjunction with other parts of the executive branch, have provided
Congress with more than a dozen briefings, many open to all members of Congress or their
staffs. The IC has also provided numerous finished intelligence products spanning a wide range
of threats, classification levels, and congressional audiences. While many of these engagements
and products have been successful and productive, others have been less so.
In order to ensure clarity and consistency across the Office of the Director of National
Intelligence's (ODNI's) engagements with Congress on elections, the ODNI will primarily meet
its obligation to keep Congress fully and currently informed leading into the Presidential election
through written finished intelligence products.
I believe this approach helps ensure, to the maximum extent possible, that the
information ODNI provides the Congress in support of your oversight responsibilities on
elections security, foreign malign influence, and election interference is not misunderstood nor
politicized. It will also better protect our sources and methods and most sensitive intelligence
from additional unauthorized disclosures or misuse."
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?