• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Didn't take long

IQ57 said:
It’s in every case.

“Try as you must, try as you may, you still, will not, win the day.” - IQ57
Click to expand...
Haha... did you say that on 11/08/20? Or was it 01/06/21? 🤡
 
^^^I spin all the galaxies.

What’s the summation of the means?

A galactic spin, lmfao.

This is the “No spin zone” buddy. Bill O’Reilly would be proud.

You are welcome.
 
^^Self-reflection at it’s finest moment.
 
“I’ve been through it all, that’s just who I am.” - IQ57

Galactic Spin said:
Ah, the first troll post ever made, circa 1987. It hasn't gotten better with age...
Click to expand...
 
Stealers Wheel said:
Nope! Just pointing out a pattern of behavior. As I stated earlier, the point of these investigations is the investigations. There will be no referrals for prosecution, just an lot of bloviating over the "outrageous" behavior of Biden. And very likely, there will be collateral damage along the way. People who had virtually nothing to do with anything will have their names and reputations sullied as accusations, in the form of 'probing questions' are hurled without basis.
Click to expand...

Ever consider approaching this story with an open mind?
 
jnug said:
Nice try.....meaningless....but a nice try none the less.

Yes...Republicans politically active as members of the GOP have been exposed as a combination of Anarchists anxious to burn the entire Republican down, Racists (finally that one is completely out of from under the cloaking device), Fascists, Christian Nationalists (more Fascists), and performance artists entirely incapable of governing. There are about 2.5 of them left in National Politcs that even have a drop of public servant's blood in their veins. I am giving Mitt half a credit to get them to 2.5.

So YUP, they are running around with their pants around their ankles and NO....it is not a pretty sight but it a sight the rest of us are forced to bear regardless of how much you try to imply that THERE IS NOTHING TO SEE HERE.
Click to expand...
Yet you keep writing about what these “GOP Anarchists” might say and do with their privates exposed.

Quite a bit to (ahem) unpack here.
 
post said:
$2 billion is 3,333 X $600,000

Report: In New Memoir, Jared Kushner Says He Wasn't ...​

https://www.vanityfair.com › News › Jared Kushner

View attachment 67423676
Jul 29, 2022 — Report: In New Memoir, Jared Kushner Says He Wasn't Willing to Turn His Back on Saudi Prince Over One Measly Murder-by-Bone Saw.

Report: Jared Kushner's $2 Billion Saudi Check Appears Even ...​

https://www.vanityfair.com › News › Jared Kushner
May 23, 2022
"...the panel that performs due diligence for the Saudi fund concluded that no one in their right mind would give the former first son-in-law a dime. Among other concerns, the panel noted that management was “inexperience[d],” that the kingdom would be responsible for “the bulk of the investment and risk,” that its fee seemed “excessive,” and that the firm’s operations were “unsatisfactory in all aspects.” Given those reservations, it warned that the country’s Public Investment Fund should stay far, far away from Kushner’s firm—a recommendation that was overturned by the fund’s board, which happens to be led by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, i.e., the guy who approved a plan to kidnap, kill, and dismember a journalist via bone saw and benefited from Kushner’s unwavering support within the White House and reported ..."

the former CFO of the Trump Org. remains on the payroll despite pleading guilty to 15 felony crimes related directly to tax evasion and tax fraud
directly benefitting that firm financially,

www.nytimes.com

Trump Family Signs Deal With Saudi Real Estate Developer (Published 2022)

The Trump Organization will license its name for a planned golf course in Oman, renewing questions about the former president’s mixing of politics and business as he appears poised for another run.
www.nytimes.com www.nytimes.com
By Eric Lipton, Maggie Haberman and Ben Protess
Nov. 14, 2022

"WASHINGTON — The Trump family has struck a deal with a Saudi-based real estate company to license its name to a housing and golf complex that will be built in Oman, renewing a swirl of questions about former President Donald J. Trump’s mixing of politics and business just as he appears poised to announce a third presidential candidacy.
News of the deal, the first such international marketing agreement the Trump Organization has negotiated since Mr. Trump left the White House, emerged as the former president already faces a string of investigations into his business.
The project is slated to be built in Muscat, Oman, on a hillside adjacent to the Gulf of Oman, and will include a golf resort, villas and two hotels, a company executive said.
The Trump family is teaming up with Dar Al Arkan, one of Saudi Arabia’s largest real estate companies, for the project. ..."



www.axios.com

Trump defends hosting Saudi-backed LIV golf tournament at Doral property

“We have human rights issues in this country too," Trump said of the U.S.
www.axios.com www.axios.com
Oct. 30, 2022
Click to expand...
B…b…b…but Jared!
 
JasperL said:
"Joe’s involvement in the prosecution of Burisma’s parent company" What prosecution? When Shokin was fired, he was sitting on his fat corrupt ass doing nothing about Burisma, or its owner. There was no prosecution.

What I get is you're either lying or have no understanding of Shokin, and why he was fired, which was because Shokin was not-investigating ANYONE, and the U.S. explicitly mentions his failure to prosecute Burisma's owner as one example of his corrupt failures. So when Shokin was ousted, with the support of the U.S. State Dept, SoS, the ambassador to Ukraine, the EU, UN, World Bank, and Ukraine reformists, it was when he was not-prosecuting Burisma, its owner, and others. So your stupid story is Biden corruptly fired Shokin, who was then not-prosecuting Burisma, to get him to not-prosecute Burisma, which he was already not-doing, and so to get in place another prosecutor who at best/worst (from Burisma's standpoint) would continue not-prosecuting Burisma and its owner, which Shokin was not-doing and had a career history of not-doing, in part by taking bribes of cash and diamonds, which got him the name the "Diamond Prosecutor"!! SCANDAL!!!

Read all about it here if you care, and I know you don't.

www.justsecurity.org

Timeline: Trump, Giuliani, Bidens, and Ukraine (updated)

A chronology of "Ukrainegate" and the Trump-Giuliani pressure on Ukraine to investigate former Vice President and 2020 presidential candidate Joe Biden.
www.justsecurity.org www.justsecurity.org
Click to expand...
Shokin. Doesn’t. Matter.
 
Buckeyes85 said:
"how much Hunter seemed to be paying Joe"

Unless you have something else to offer, am I correct your house of cards is premised entirely upon Hunter's text (to a family member?) that he gives half his pay to Joe?
Click to expand...
Correct, that is partly what the suspicion is based on. Hunter’s own words, in an unguarded moment, saying how much of his salary (i.e. lobbying income) he hands over to is father, then the Vice President of the United States. That statement, combined with other circumstances that fit a pattern of pay-for-access, create a reasonable suspicion that warrants further investigation.
 
NatMorton said:
Shokin. Doesn’t. Matter.
Click to expand...
He doesn't matter if facts don't matter and all you want to do is spew idiotic talking points you don't understand at all. So, yeah, guess not!
 
uptower said:
Again this only points to bribery for the very imaginative. As I said there's scant evidence. There's so little in fact that if you invented a few dots to connect it to, it could amount to anything you want.

The fact there's nothing but a mildly suggestive text message on a stolen computer is probably why the FBI hasn't latched on to it. With help from talk radio it fires the base's imagination, creating the motivation for this GOP circle jerk, but if there was anything concrete, law enforcement would have started a genuine investigation already.

There's also little cause for suspicion. Joe Biden has been in politics fifty years without taking bribes or kickbacks. He's seriously going to wait till a VP slot late in his career to start? He's simply not a suspicious character, regardless of whether you like his politics or what a mess his son has become.
Click to expand...

Again, if you’re right there’s nothing to worry about from an investigation. Yet you and others here are arguing vociferously against any attempt at one. Why?

Second question, what would, in your mind, be an example of additional evidence that might reach a threshold for an investigation? Perhaps a whistleblower account that, in complete contradiction to Joe Biden’s public statements, asserts Joe does in fact involve himself in his son’s business partners?
 
Callen said:
To be clear the text doesn't refer to that in the present tense but rather in the past tense and is a conversation with his daughter about not having to pay him back for her education and free use of his apartment for her and her then boyfriend .
Click to expand...

Either you haven’t read the text or you don’t fully understand English verb tenses. Which is it?
 
Left-wing logic: When Hunter said he gave half of what he earns lobbying to his father, he meant it was in the past. And of course, such payments would only be a problem when Joe was Vice President, not a Senator.
 
NatMorton said:
Left-wing logic: When Hunter said he gave half of what he earns lobbying to his father, he meant it was in the past. And of course, such payments would only be a problem when Joe was Vice President, not a Senator.
Click to expand...
Actually it would never be a problem
 
^^Left wing logic, yup.

Rules for thee, but not for me.

Thanks for being honest, first time?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom