- Joined
- Apr 13, 2011
- Messages
- 15,910
- Reaction score
- 12,630
- Location
- Plano, Texas
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Other
I didn't know what to think when I heard commentator after commentator hoist up the little girl to promote the next segment.
I never said that. Not once. I said "her guilt can't be proven".
And quite frankly, I don't care about whether or not I disappoint you. I'm not living and breathing to gain your approval.
Perhaps. If it has the media going nuts, the jury must have been onto something.
Why even respond to my initial post if you simply want to argue? Don't bother me with contention.
I say she's the murderer, and I say our system, the best of the worst, is not good.
It's my opinion, and that's it.
Jury was into CSI on CBS vegas, NY and Miami....where there is ALWAYS physical evidence...ALWAYS...bullshiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit lol
That sounds familiar. I heard that line a million times on the news. Interesting, isn't it?
There are websites specifically for Caylee where members have pictures of her as their avatars. They post messages to Caylee on a daily basis, almost like they're e-mailing a friend across-country. It's very, very sad that this little girl died so young, regardless of why and how she died. But some people are not only disturbingly obsessive, but also shamelessly self-promoting in her image.
Hell, didn't Nancy Grace delare her guilty? That shoud be good enough for anyone?
Hey, maybe the USA should abolish the jury system and just have her pass judgement.
.
I was eating ribs with a friend of mine last night, I decided to check the Apple app store for "news." The trial updates were the two most popular apps.
Interesting as to where it comes from. Very little information has been released about the jurors...I'm wondering how I missed their TV watching habits.
Did the jury in the Casey Anthony trial get the verdict right? The defense demonstrated reasonable doubt and the prosecution was unable to prove the case against Ms. Anthony
For somebody who waxes philosophical so often, you would think you would be interested in considering new information in regards to your opinion. I suppose I was wrong there.
Do you think that question doesn't press on my mind every few minutes? I know I usually speak of absolute proof and unproven beliefs. This case, every single minute detail, makes my gut deep down know... she did it. She's getting away with murder.
This scenario simply shows me the hilarity of our system...
...and shows me how incredibly easy it is to get away with murder.
It also shows exactly where your "philosophical mind" shuts off. Knowing "in your gut, deep down" because of circumstantial evidence isn't reliable, and you know it. You're talking emotion and instinct, not fact.
To forsake emotion and instinct for only observable facts is not human. Unless, of course, I take on that challenge.
We humans have many intangible components. I can be so philosophical and fact-based, yet issues---very certain issues like this one---dredge up emotions and a sense of injustice... fallible system be damned.
To forsake emotion and instinct for only observable facts is not human. Unless, of course, I take on that challenge.
We humans have many intangible components. I can be so philosophical and fact-based, yet issues---very certain issues like this one---dredge up emotions and a sense of injustice... fallible system be damned.
They can still charge her with child neglect though.
No double jeopardy with that.
Hell, didn't Nancy Grace delare her guilty? That shoud be good enough for anyone?
Hey, maybe the USA should abolish the jury system and just have her pass judgement.
.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?