Did NATO - oh, excuse me, "Ukraine" - just try to take out Putin?
Did NATO - oh, excuse me, "Ukraine" - just try to take out Putin?
Did NATO - oh, excuse me, "Ukraine" - just try to take out Putin?
Did NATO - oh, excuse me, "Ukraine" - just try to take out Putin?
Great person.The OP's "source" is a YouTube video by Clayton Morris, a former FOX News anchor (Fox & Friends 2008-2017). His forte is real estate.
In March 2019, investors filed more than two dozen lawsuits in Indiana and New Jersey, claiming that Morris was running a Ponzi scheme involving the sales of some houses in C- and D-class neighborhoods that were marketed through his investment company, Morris Invest, in Indianapolis. In May 2020, the state of Indiana filed a civil lawsuit against Clayton Morris, among others, for violating Indiana's deceptive sales and home loan acts in real estate deals involving more than 150 properties in Marion County. After the lawsuits were filed, Morris and his wife (Natali) packed up the family and moved to Portugal.
![]()
Former 'Fox & Friends Weekend' host Clayton Morris accused of deceptive home sales
The troubling home sales that prompted the Indiana attorney general to file a complaint were the subject of a 2019 IndyStar Investigation.www.indystar.com
Ex-Fox & Friends co-host Clayton Morris leaves country amid fraud allegations, lawsuits
Oh really?Didnt watch. Summary?
It's a war...seems like any leaders of aggressive invasions would be fair game, right?
Oh really?
So if another country had tried to take out George Bush or Tony Blair over Iraq, the West wouldn’t have had an issue with that, right?
Oh wait![]()
The claim that “leaders of aggressive invasions are fair game” has never been upheld, because if it was basically every American president of the last forty years would have been a valid target.No one said Russia would like it.
But they might![]()
The claim that “leaders of aggressive invasions are fair game” has never been upheld, because if it was basically every American president of the last forty years would have been a valid target.
Nah, if “leaders of aggressive invasion are fair game” than every single one of those presidents would be a valid target. There’s a reason— other than embarrassment at total lack of success in Cuba— the US got out of the “assassinating world leaders” gameTarget yes...they would be, have been, are. "Valid"? That's a matter of opinion and I provided mine.
Did it ever occur to you that there are other factors? Such as access/ability, proportional response, consequences, future sanctions, etc?![]()
Nah, if “leaders of aggressive invasion are fair game” than every single one of those presidents would be a valid target. There’s a reason— other than embarrassment at total lack of success in Cuba— the US got out of the “assassinating world leaders” game
My sad is -1.Wouldn't that just be a crying shame.
Ukraine appears utterly unable to accomplish any such thing.Whether Ukraine decides to kill putin is none of putin's business.