• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Did NATO Just Try to Take Out Putin?

sanman

DP Veteran
Joined
Nov 22, 2015
Messages
17,157
Reaction score
7,201
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative
Did NATO - oh, excuse me, "Ukraine" - just try to take out Putin?

 
Did NATO - oh, excuse me, "Ukraine" - just try to take out Putin?


Are you speaking of the leader of Russia who murders children daily?
 
Did NATO - oh, excuse me, "Ukraine" - just try to take out Putin?



Didnt watch. Summary?

It's a war...seems like any leaders of aggressive invasions would be fair game, right?
 
Did NATO - oh, excuse me, "Ukraine" - just try to take out Putin?



The OP's "source" is a YouTube video by Clayton Morris, a former FOX News anchor (Fox & Friends 2008-2017). His forte is real estate.

In March 2019, investors filed more than two dozen lawsuits in Indiana and New Jersey, claiming that Morris was running a Ponzi scheme involving the sales of some houses in C- and D-class neighborhoods that were marketed through his investment company, Morris Invest, in Indianapolis. In May 2020, the state of Indiana filed a civil lawsuit against Clayton Morris, among others, for violating Indiana's deceptive sales and home loan acts in real estate deals involving more than 150 properties in Marion County. After the lawsuits were filed, Morris and his wife (Natali) packed up the family and moved to Portugal.


Ex-Fox & Friends co-host Clayton Morris leaves country amid fraud allegations, lawsuits
 
The OP's "source" is a YouTube video by Clayton Morris, a former FOX News anchor (Fox & Friends 2008-2017). His forte is real estate.

In March 2019, investors filed more than two dozen lawsuits in Indiana and New Jersey, claiming that Morris was running a Ponzi scheme involving the sales of some houses in C- and D-class neighborhoods that were marketed through his investment company, Morris Invest, in Indianapolis. In May 2020, the state of Indiana filed a civil lawsuit against Clayton Morris, among others, for violating Indiana's deceptive sales and home loan acts in real estate deals involving more than 150 properties in Marion County. After the lawsuits were filed, Morris and his wife (Natali) packed up the family and moved to Portugal.


Ex-Fox & Friends co-host Clayton Morris leaves country amid fraud allegations, lawsuits
Great person.

Investors say ex-‘Fox & Friends’ host turned them into unwitting slumlords

He is hiding in Portugal trying to dodge the lawsuits.
 
Didnt watch. Summary?

It's a war...seems like any leaders of aggressive invasions would be fair game, right?
Oh really?

So if another country had tried to take out George Bush or Tony Blair over Iraq, the West wouldn’t have had an issue with that, right?

Oh wait 🙄😂
 
Oh really?

So if another country had tried to take out George Bush or Tony Blair over Iraq, the West wouldn’t have had an issue with that, right?

Oh wait 🙄😂

No one said Russia would like it.

But they might ;)
 
No one said Russia would like it.

But they might ;)
The claim that “leaders of aggressive invasions are fair game” has never been upheld, because if it was basically every American president of the last forty years would have been a valid target.
 
The claim that “leaders of aggressive invasions are fair game” has never been upheld, because if it was basically every American president of the last forty years would have been a valid target.

Target yes...they would be, have been, are. "Valid"? That's a matter of opinion and I provided mine.

Did it ever occur to you that there are other factors? Such as access/ability, proportional response, consequences, future sanctions, etc? :rolleyes:
 
Target yes...they would be, have been, are. "Valid"? That's a matter of opinion and I provided mine.

Did it ever occur to you that there are other factors? Such as access/ability, proportional response, consequences, future sanctions, etc? :rolleyes:
Nah, if “leaders of aggressive invasion are fair game” than every single one of those presidents would be a valid target. There’s a reason— other than embarrassment at total lack of success in Cuba— the US got out of the “assassinating world leaders” game
 
Nah, if “leaders of aggressive invasion are fair game” than every single one of those presidents would be a valid target. There’s a reason— other than embarrassment at total lack of success in Cuba— the US got out of the “assassinating world leaders” game

Agreed, they are a valid target, "fair game". As I wrote.
 
Whether Ukraine decides to kill putin is none of putin's business.
 
Back
Top Bottom