• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Denver's proposed camping ban passes council on first reading

Well maybe not the Federal government - but I see nothing wrong with a state taking it on - it's an issue within their state. I don't see why they shouldn't be 'allowed 't od oso.

Shrug...

I've never said the State should not be allowed to deal with it...I said they shouldn't because they have more important things to spend their money on.
 
Sewage is not confined to Denver either...all communities have it. Do you think the State or the Fed should pay for Denver's sewage treatment?

How is that applicable? Sewage is not a problem plaguing every city in this country. Furthermore I believe there are federal guidelines surrounding sewage.
 
How is that applicable? Sewage is not a problem plaguing every city in this country. Furthermore I believe there are federal guidelines surrounding sewage.

???

Are you saying there are cities that don't have sewage?

Also, Federal guidelines don't equal Federal money.
 
And I asked what is more important?

Oh, things like...education...the State Patrol...State highways...things like that.
 
Shrug...

I've never said the State should not be allowed to deal with it...I said they shouldn't because they have more important things to spend their money on.

LOL - trust me: they can multitask.
 
Are you sure? I'm not sure they can single-task.

I'm imagining the outcry that happens on a vast scale whenever cities have engaged the idea of ending the funding for homeless support and assistance.
 

If your downtown is anything like my downtown it is not the the homeless being allowed to camp out that attracts the homeless to the downtown area. It is the soup kitchens and other facilities that aid the homeless that attracts the homeless as well as everyone who gives a homeless person a dollar. I think the solution would be to zone the sparsely populated area of town for homeless shelters and soup kitchens and other facilities that aid the homeless and provide one way bus routes to that area.They can pack in the Labor Readys,employment agencies in that area too.


That said if your downtown is also like my downtown then another reason people detest going to downtown is having to pay for parking and when they do find parking they have to walk for several blocks. There are three things I go to my downtown for if I do go to downtown area of my city. It is Home depot, Mexicali Border Cafe, and Spaghetti Warehouse.That is only because those places have their own parking.
 

We certainly have our share of soup kitchens, shelters ect. Those are good things. Isolating the homeless should not even be on the table. That is not even something resembling a solution. We need to be helping them get off the street, not pushing them into corners
 
We certainly have our share of soup kitchens, shelters ect. Those are good things.
Not if those things are in your neighborhood.


Isolating the homeless should not even be on the table. That is not even something resembling a solution. We need to be helping them get off the street, not pushing them into corners
If you move the soup kitchen, shelters and other facilities that aid the homeless to a sparsely populated area on the outside of town they will still get the help they need.The only difference is they would be away from the downtown area
 

For every job our corps create in china....they put an american out of work...who is paying no taxs here and is either on govt assistance or homeless...its a vicious cycle..
 

As a fellow Coloradan, I gotta say, I don't find the same problems you found in D-town. Granted, I don't live there but I've been there plenty; downtown, Capitol Hill, Five Points, Colfax, etc. There are quite a few homeless people, as there are in any large city, but I don't get the sense they are harassing people or impeding business. In fact, there are a lot of programs designed to help the homeless that are funded by businesses.

I do know that the issue of camping has come up in several CO cities, including the smaller town I live in. I can understand why they don't want camps of homeless people in city parks. While homeless people are not necessarily more violent than others, drinking and drug use increases in homeless populations as does other crime levels. Plus, it makes the parks unattractive to families and visitors.

I know there is a pretty good size community effort to assist Denver's homeless population. I'm all for keeping our homeless population off the streets and out of the parks with public and private assistance, but I don't want these laws used to criminalize homelessness.
 
For every job our corps create in china....they put an american out of work...who is paying no taxs here and is either on govt assistance or homeless...its a vicious cycle..

Yeah, we really need to bring back those valuable toy and textile making labor jobs.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…