• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Denmark does not deserve Greenland ….

By that standard America doesn’t deserve any of its territory. Break the whole country up.
Canada doesn't deserve Canada, the UK doesn't deserve Scotland, Ireland or Wales and so on.
 
btw … all Inuits are Eskimos,
but. not all Eskimos are Innuits

Eskimo is the correct term for all groups
 
'Eskimo' is what the Cree called them. It's a derogatory term meaning 'eater of raw meat'.
Those people refer to themselves as Inuit.

Yeah, I just found out the chocolate-covered vanilla ice cream bars I enjoyed throughout my life were racist. I honestly hadn’t heard of an “Edy’s Pie.” 😆

 
now there is apetition in Denmark to buy California …..
 
btw … all Inuits are Eskimos,
but. not all Eskimos are Innuits

Eskimo is the correct term for all groups
No, it is not actually. In Canada it is considered a very offensive racial slur like calling a black person the n-word.
 
Maybe Greenland could merge with Iceland. That would be a more viable country.
 
who is right now?
You know Alaska is not part of Canada right? In Canada it is considered a very offensive racial slur, so no Eskimo does not describe the whole ethnic group.

Also even in Alaska the preference is changing. See here.
 
You know Alaska is not part of Canada right? In Canada it is considered a very offensive racial slur, so no Eskimo does not describe the whole ethnic group.

Also even in Alaska the preference is changing. See here.
maker of straw shoes is not racist
 
maker of straw shoes is not racist
You don't get to decide that.

The local First Nations people here are now the Od'ham.

They used to be called the Papago (eaters of beans) starting with the arrival of the Spanish, but they didn't like that and returned to their old name.

Is "eater of beans" racist? The Od'ham thought so.
 
Straw shoes is no n word
 
'Eskimo' is what the Cree called them. It's a derogatory term meaning 'eater of raw meat'.
Those people refer to themselves as Inuit.
what's wrong with raw meat? I hear raw fish is very popular these days, though I use it for bait.
 
I’m going to teach my parrot that very phrase so he can squawk it at my Dad everytime he turns on Fox News 🤣
if you do, put it on Tik Tok, it will go viral, you could make some serious money with your parrot.
 
Denmark admits that it has Not always treated the Greenlanders well.

Now they will treat them better
 
Back
Top Bottom