Skeptic Bob
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2014
- Messages
- 16,626
- Reaction score
- 19,488
- Location
- Texas
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Left
We still don’t know the details about Mueller’s report, but so far my prediction that Trump wouldn’t be directly connected to any Russian collusion seems to be holding up. Personally, moving into the 2020 election cycle I think the Dems should drop collusion as an issue. But there is something provable that came out of the investigation that the Dems should emphasize: Trumps surrounds himself with criminals.
There is no arguing that now. We have not only indictments but convictions. Frankly, I was surprised by how many people were taken down for their crimes from this investigation.
Ask the voters if they want a President who employed criminals as his confidants and advisors. Ask the voters if they want a President who couldn’t even earn or keep the respect of numerous previous cabinet appointees that he personally picked. Show that Trump is incapable of building an administration staffed with qualified, law abiding citizens.
There is no need for Dems to play the speculation game. Stick to the proven facts, because those are damning enough.
We still don’t know the details about Mueller’s report, but so far my prediction that Trump wouldn’t be directly connected to any Russian collusion seems to be holding up. Personally, moving into the 2020 election cycle I think the Dems should drop collusion as an issue. But there is something provable that came out of the investigation that the Dems should emphasize: Trumps surrounds himself with criminals.
There is no arguing that now. We have not only indictments but convictions. Frankly, I was surprised by how many people were taken down for their crimes from this investigation.
Ask the voters if they want a President who employed criminals as his confidants and advisors. Ask the voters if they want a President who couldn’t even earn or keep the respect of numerous previous cabinet appointees that he personally picked. Show that Trump is incapable of building an administration staffed with qualified, law abiding citizens.
There is no need for Dems to play the speculation game. Stick to the proven facts, because those are damning enough.
This is an argument that will backfire on the Dems because 1) the various indictments against Trump associates were minor, personal, and unrelated to Trump, and 2) the Dems are dirtier and can be shown to engage in multiple coverups
Democrats better get their heads out of their asses or prepare for a landslide Trump 2020 election, imo.
We still don’t know the details about Mueller’s report, but so far my prediction that Trump wouldn’t be directly connected to any Russian collusion seems to be holding up. Personally, moving into the 2020 election cycle I think the Dems should drop collusion as an issue. But there is something provable that came out of the investigation that the Dems should emphasize: Trumps surrounds himself with criminals.
There is no arguing that now. We have not only indictments but convictions. Frankly, I was surprised by how many people were taken down for their crimes from this investigation.
Ask the voters if they want a President who employed criminals as his confidants and advisors. Ask the voters if they want a President who couldn’t even earn or keep the respect of numerous previous cabinet appointees that he personally picked. Show that Trump is incapable of building an administration staffed with qualified, law abiding citizens.
There is no need for Dems to play the speculation game. Stick to the proven facts, because those are damning enough.
We still don’t know the details about Mueller’s report, but so far my prediction that Trump wouldn’t be directly connected to any Russian collusion seems to be holding up. Personally, moving into the 2020 election cycle I think the Dems should drop collusion as an issue. But there is something provable that came out of the investigation that the Dems should emphasize: Trumps surrounds himself with criminals.
There is no arguing that now. We have not only indictments but convictions. Frankly, I was surprised by how many people were taken down for their crimes from this investigation.
Ask the voters if they want a President who employed criminals as his confidants and advisors. Ask the voters if they want a President who couldn’t even earn or keep the respect of numerous previous cabinet appointees that he personally picked. Show that Trump is incapable of building an administration staffed with qualified, law abiding citizens.
There is no need for Dems to play the speculation game. Stick to the proven facts, because those are damning enough.
We still don’t know the details about Mueller’s report, but so far my prediction that Trump wouldn’t be directly connected to any Russian collusion seems to be holding up. Personally, moving into the 2020 election cycle I think the Dems should drop collusion as an issue. But there is something provable that came out of the investigation that the Dems should emphasize: Trumps surrounds himself with criminals.
There is no arguing that now. We have not only indictments but convictions. Frankly, I was surprised by how many people were taken down for their crimes from this investigation.
Ask the voters if they want a President who employed criminals as his confidants and advisors. Ask the voters if they want a President who couldn’t even earn or keep the respect of numerous previous cabinet appointees that he personally picked. Show that Trump is incapable of building an administration staffed with qualified, law abiding citizens.
There is no need for Dems to play the speculation game. Stick to the proven facts, because those are damning enough.
Democrats better get their heads out of their asses or prepare for a landslide Trump 2020 election, imo.
If democrats stuck to proven facts, they'd have nothing.
The SDNY is also looking into the Trump family for bank fraud, mortgage fraud, tax fraud, and election "contributions in kind" felonies.
This is an argument that will backfire on the Dems because 1) the various indictments against Trump associates were minor, personal, and unrelated to Trump, and 2) the Dems are dirtier and can be shown to engage in multiple coverups
Some do, and worse.If even one quarter of the number of Obama associates went down like Trump associates did, every conservative outlet would be calling Obama the head of an organized crime family.
1. Minor? No. Connected to Trump? Not that we currently know of, but the sheer number of those associated with Trump who have been charged/convicted of crimes should give every American, regardless of political persuasion, reason to consider what kind of person surrounds himself with so many obvious criminals?
2. You keeping score? Both parties have done plenty of dirty ****. Saying one is less guilty than the other is really disingenuous and frankly, stupid.
If even one quarter of the number of Obama associates went down like Trump associates did, every conservative outlet would be calling Obama the head of an organized crime family.
I tend to agree. Overreach is unnecessary and the sleazy facts, felony indictments, plea deals, and convictions are quite damming.
Not to even mention all the resignations from Trumps White House/Administration, former Cabinet members under investigation, and nepotism.
Plus there are two trials going on for Trump violating the Emoluments Clause, and 16 states are suing Trumps faux border emergency decree.
The SDNY is also looking into the Trump family for bank fraud, mortgage fraud, tax fraud, and election "contributions in kind" felonies.
One important difference between Democrats and Republicans is that Democrats don't have a propaganda media outlet to spew out talking points 24/7. While Republicans can leave the propaganda to Fox News, Democrats must craft their public narratives entirely by themselves.
One important difference between Democrats and Republicans is that Democrats don't have a propaganda media outlet to spew out talking points 24/7. While Republicans can leave the propaganda to Fox News, Democrats must craft their public narratives entirely by themselves.
Bigging up your fortune to get a bank loan while minimising it to the taxman is fraud. This we know. :mrgreen:
Yes, republicans have 'a' propaganda news outlet--Fox. Democrats have every other news outlet acting as their Ministry of Propaganda.
Republicans have a propaganda outlet because they believe (falsely) that they're just doing what everybody else does. Which is pretty much how all bad people justify their abhorrent behavior: "If I didn't do it, somebody else would just do it to me."
We still don’t know the details about Mueller’s report, but so far my prediction that Trump wouldn’t be directly connected to any Russian collusion seems to be holding up. Personally, moving into the 2020 election cycle I think the Dems should drop collusion as an issue. But there is something provable that came out of the investigation that the Dems should emphasize: Trumps surrounds himself with criminals.
There is no arguing that now. We have not only indictments but convictions. Frankly, I was surprised by how many people were taken down for their crimes from this investigation.
Ask the voters if they want a President who employed criminals as his confidants and advisors. Ask the voters if they want a President who couldn’t even earn or keep the respect of numerous previous cabinet appointees that he personally picked. Show that Trump is incapable of building an administration staffed with qualified, law abiding citizens.
There is no need for Dems to play the speculation game. Stick to the proven facts, because those are damning enough.
Uh, no. Liberals had a monopoly on the media until Fox broke it. Now you liberals just cant stand the idea that you dont get to control the narrative and spew your nonsense un-apposed.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?