- Joined
- Oct 12, 2005
- Messages
- 281,619
- Reaction score
- 100,389
- Location
- Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
With what Democrats are planning, that mattress as an option is looking better every day.
Article is here.
It's a start, but not near enough. I won't cheer until the super rich pay 91 percent taxes, the same percentage they paid back in the 60's.
ricksfolly
Social services should have never been the duty of the government. The concept of helping the poor and the homeless are from charities. The cost of war, even if it's an unfavored war, is still within the premise of the federal government. And the fact that social services cost more than the war means that we should cut more of social spending. If you want to start demilitarizing ourselves, I pray you never become a politician. You will be handing our land on a silver platter....
And you are for allowing the rich to hide their money from the government in offshore accounts, etc and not pair their fair share?
Why do you hate the rich? Don't you enjoy living in a country where it's possible to become rich? Or do you agree with Obama and think there's a certain point where you've made enough? He never did say how much that would be, but it doesn't matter. Any limit is Un-American in my opinion. So far, this is not a country where limits are set on how successful you can become.
So you think it's a grand idea that Minnesota and Texas secede from the union? After all, some Republicans have introduced legislation calling for it.
Going by the logic of this thread:
Republicans want private companies to be able to censor your internet content.
With what Democrats are planning, that mattress as an option is looking better every day.
Article is here.
Going by the logic of this thread:
Republicans want private companies to be able to censor your internet content.
Bachmann called it extortion, Cantor said stop demonizing BP, Rand Paul called it unAmerican, Steve King said Barton was "spot-on when he called it a 'shakedown.' ".
So you think it's a grand idea that Minnesota and Texas secede from the union? After all, some Republicans have introduced legislation calling for it.
while the obamunists want the government to be able to do it
you don't have to deal with a private company
You do if you want internet access. In most of the country, there's only one or two internet providers. Also, how exactly do "obamunists" want the government to be able to censor content? It's liberals who are the strongest defenders of Net Neutrality.
Well, that was legislation introduced by a couple of Republicans, so according to your theory, you and all other Republicans now own it.As tempting as it is, my answer is no. We need to stay and fight for the good of the country as a whole.
Exactly, because it's a government takeover by the FCC of a system that is not broken.
Social services should have never been the duty of the government. The concept of helping the poor and the homeless are from charities. The cost of war, even if it's an unfavored war, is still within the premise of the federal government. And the fact that social services cost more than the war means that we should cut more of social spending. If you want to start demilitarizing ourselves, I pray you never become a politician. You will be handing our land on a silver platter....
You're right and it's about time a few Rep grew some onions. I especially love Bachmann and King when it comes to speaking their minds. They are awesome!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?