• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Democrats Shoot Themselves In The Foot

Didn't read the article, did you? Democrats hurt themselves (Biden) by the impeachment nonsense and bolstered Trump in several ways. Several people on your own side have posted over the years that Democrats will always find a way to loose. And, you have done it again.

You should read it before commenting on whether other posters have read it.

The case for impeaching Trump over Ukraine has proved “compelling and overwhelming.” But it has not proved “bipartisan,” because congressional Republicans care less about weighing evidence than displaying their allegiance to Trump.

Pelosi and her fellow Democrats have behaved honorably. Politically, however, they are facing the very backlash that she feared a partisan impeachment might spark.

The article is saying that democrats proved their case, the president is corrupt, but that Republicans really have no morals or ethics so they are fine with having a corrupt president as long as he's on their side.

Thanks for pointing out what I already knew.

P.S. - Read before posting next time. I know you won't admit it and I know you'll pretend like this doesn't make you look silly, but it does. It's embarrassing that you'd post an article like this as though it's very wise and correct and then back track when you find out it trashes your side more than the other side.
 
Didn't read the article, did you? Democrats hurt themselves (Biden) by the impeachment nonsense and bolstered Trump in several ways. Several people on your own side have posted over the years that Democrats will always find a way to loose. And, you have done it again.

Donald had his brief moment on top propped up by his GOP cult and a questionable Gallup poll.

When Barr and the McConnell s of the country are covering up by lying for Trump, Donald is safe. When Donald opens his mouth uncontrolled he goes downhill fast. Good luck next polling.

Well old Donald and little Donald can't let dead dogs lie. Donald's moment has begun to fade as usual when he makes the call and opens his mouth freely
 
Only to you.

I realize and I respect the fact that you have no answer to debate my posts so your only resort is to twist the facts of a post I made eons ago. Changing the subject is the best you've got.
 
You should read it before commenting on whether other posters have read it.



The article is saying that democrats proved their case, the president is corrupt, but that Republicans really have no morals or ethics so they are fine with having a corrupt president as long as he's on their side.

Thanks for pointing out what I already knew.

P.S. - Read before posting next time. I know you won't admit it and I know you'll pretend like this doesn't make you look silly, but it does. It's embarrassing that you'd post an article like this as though it's very wise and correct and then back track when you find out it trashes your side more than the other side.

This article is saying that Democrats damaged themselves and Biden more by impeaching Trump than if they hadn't impeached Trump.
 
Donald had his brief moment on top propped up by his GOP cult and a questionable Gallup poll.

When Barr and the McConnell s of the country are covering up by lying for Trump, Donald is safe. When Donald opens his mouth uncontrolled he goes downhill fast. Good luck next polling.

Well old Donald and little Donald can't let dead dogs lie. Donald's moment has begun to fade as usual when he makes the call and opens his mouth freely

LOL. So now you are saying there is such a thing as a deep state. How quickly we change our minds.
 
The article is saying that Trump was pressuring a foreign country to trash a political opponent.

So I guess this is you admitting that you knew full well that Trump is a lawless and immoral president who is attempting to subvert our free and fair elections but that you're ok with it? Or do you just have no idea what you're linking to because you just link to anything that sounds bad for Dems?

do an investigation of Biden/Burisma and if it turns up nothing was amiss then maybe Trump did wrong. I don't think you get a pass on corruption just because you are running for the democratic nomination. Dems are very good about covering for their own. Hillary, emails, Benghazi. Bill Clinton affair in white house wit intern, lie to cover it up in federal court, that is a crime folks. Dems voted to acquit. Just like he republicans.
 
LOL. So now you are saying there is such a thing as a deep state. How quickly we change our minds.

Remember Donald created this whole mess by his zeal to be supreme leader. But like all zealites, e. g. Hitler and Mussolini their own character flaws eventually destroy them
 
Here's an article that Democrats should take to heart. Unfortunately for them, it is too late.

Impeachment Gave Trump Exactly What He Wanted - The Atlantic

Exactly. I said for months that impeachment was political folly, futile, and would backfire. After the Ukrainian call I did feel that it was inevitable because you can't really fail to call out the president if he enlists foreign help in a domestic election. But inevitable or not, I knew that it would backfire. It did.
 
The article is saying that Trump was pressuring a foreign country to trash a political opponent.

So I guess this is you admitting that you knew full well that Trump is a lawless and immoral president who is attempting to subvert our free and fair elections but that you're ok with it? Or do you just have no idea what you're linking to because you just link to anything that sounds bad for Dems?

The Democrats gave the Biden scandal more attention than Trump ever hoped to.

It was literally impossible to talk about Trump's impeachment without mentioning Biden's Ukraine scam. Now? The impeachment is over, but the Biden scam ain't goin no where...lol
 
I said, the fake conspiracy theory that Biden was corrupt in Ukraine will be for Biden the same as the Swift Boat fake conspiracy was for John Kerry and will doom his candidacy. He won't recover. The Republicans' dirty tricks work.
 
The article is saying that Trump was pressuring a foreign country to trash a political opponent.

So I guess this is you admitting that you knew full well that Trump is a lawless and immoral president who is attempting to subvert our free and fair elections but that you're ok with it? Or do you just have no idea what you're linking to because you just link to anything that sounds bad for Dems?

~~~~~~
From the start there was no threat that Joey (foot in mouth) Biden was ever a threat in the presidential race. There has never been an attempt by Trump or the GOP to subvert the coming election. On the other hand there has been more than enough evidence no matter how the LSM has tried to subvert the 2016 election and since the coming 2020 election. Try as they might the Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA elitists have worked 24/7 since November to impeach and/or overthrow the will of the American people. IT began with the $9 million dollar funding from the Clinton campaign to Perkins-Coie to create the Steele Dossier right up to the acquittal vote of the Senate.
I's not over as we have seen in the debacle created in Iowa. Nor have the sore loser Pelosi, Schiff and company ended their attacks. There's more to come. I personally fear that because the Left is losing so badly they may physically attempt to eliminate Trump....
 
This article is saying that Democrats damaged themselves and Biden more by impeaching Trump than if they hadn't impeached Trump.

Biden was already damaged by Trump and no one wants to vote for a guy that tells his constituency to vote for someone else.
 
No, Democrats, in spite of their strong desire to avoid it, were backed into a corner and left with no choice but to impeach this most dishonest of Presidents.

That he was acquitted is on the tOP (formerly the GOP) who put on a sham trial that will be remembered most negatively by history.
 
1. According to the GAO, it was illegal to hold the aid in the way he did. Congress appropriated those funds, the funds passed the checks required by the federal agencies, therefor the money shouldn't have been held up. Illegal.

2. There is no debating whether what Trump did was right or wrong. It was wrong. Every republican worth any respect what so ever, and even some worthless ****head republicans freely admit it was wrong. Even Trump **** suckers like Graham were saying how wrong it would be if Trump did what he did prior to them knowing that he did it. So this isn't really debatable.

3. You are already twisting this. Trump didn't ask for an investigation. He asked for a very public announcement of an investigation. To give you an idea of the difference, here is a similar example. I think it was perfectly fine for the FBI to investigate the Trump campaign in the lead up to the election if they thought there was evidence of wrongdoing or if there was a national security issue. But it wouldn't be ok for the FBI to come out days before the election and just announce that they are going to investigate the Trump campaign. You can have a valid reason to investigate. But there's absolutely no valid reason to just announce an investigation other than to try to trash the person. Whether the person is the nominee doesn't matter. He's running to be the nominee. Also, what Trump did was wrong regardless of whether an investigation was warranted, but the facts are that the investigation isn't warranted. There's absolutely no evidence that Biden acted in any manner that wasn't in accordance with official US policy. Numerous republican senators, the US government, the international community and numerous were also in agreement that the prosecutor needed to be removed. You need only look at the articles from the time. Nearly everyone with the exception of corrupt officials wanted the guy gone. ( Ukraine Ousts Viktor Shokin, Top Prosecutor, and Political Stability Hangs in the Balance - The New York Times ). So to put it bluntly, your question is idiotic and farcical.

"According to the GAO, it was illegal to hold the aid in the way he did."

The aid was release before the deadline. How was it 'illegal'?

Sure, the administration missed sending a memo to the GAO or Congress that the aid was delayed, but historically, every administration has. Sometimes there are delays in these things.

www.lawenforcementtoday.com › double-standards-seven-different-ti...
Seven different times Obama was found to have violated ...

Jan 18, 2020 - Seven different times Obama was found to have violated federal law. Posted by ... The problem is, the GAO incorrectly interpreted the act. In fact ...

www.wsj.com › Opinion › Letters
Despite the GAO, Mr. Trump Broke No Rule - WSJ

Jan 22, 2020 - Your editorial “Trump, Obama and the Spending Power” (Jan. ... the Office of Management and Budget violated the law are misleading at best.

politicalbullpen.com › US News & Politics › Law and Order
The GAO Found the Obama Administration Violated Federal ...

Jan 17, 2020 - By Democrats' standards, Obama ought to have been impeached for the seven times the GAO found his administration violated federal law.

bongino.com › flashback-seven-times-the-gao-said-the-obama-admini...
FLASHBACK: Seven Times the GAO Said the Obama ...

Jan 17, 2020 - FLASHBACK: Seven Times the GAO Said the Obama Administration ... Office of Management and Budget violated the Impoundment Control ...

I don't seem to recall Obama, or any other president for that matter, having any fauxrage over it. Why are the 'rules' for Trump so disproportionate, so hypocritical, so double standards, so one sided all the time?
 
I'm not saying anything other than the fact that Democrats drive for impeachment has shot themselves in their own foot and this article explains it quite well. The article is written from a Democratic perspective so, therefore, you can't claim this is something from Fox News.


Sometimes, you just have to do the right thing, regardless of potential consequences, regardless of how corrupt republicans are.


We really don't give a damn, we did the right thing, and I'm proud of my fellow democrats in office for doing it.

See, it's about which side of history do you want to be? On the right side, or the wrong side?

Dems are on the right side, on this one. It's so ****ing clear I don't know what to say, if you can't see it.
 
Biden was already damaged by Trump and no one wants to vote for a guy that tells his constituency to vote for someone else.

LOL. Oh, you mean like when you call 62 million people deplorables, you shouldn't expect them to vote for you?
 
Sometimes, you just have to do the right thing, regardless of potential consequences, regardless of how corrupt republicans are.


We really don't give a damn, we did the right thing, and I'm proud of my fellow democrats in office for doing it.

See, it's about which side of history do you want to be? On the right side, or the wrong side?

Dems are on the right side, on this one. It's so ****ing clear I don't know what to say, if you can't see it.

Congratulations to you for feeling that you did the right thing. May God bless you. Does the right thing include helping Donald J Trump win another four year term? Is that the right thing? I mean you knew going in that Trump would not be removed from office. Was the right thing calling 62 million people deplorables, causing them to go out and vote for Trump in 2016? Is the "right thing" calling Trump supporters racists, bigots, misogynists, Nazi's, white nationalists and accusing them of wanting to destroy democracy? Again, God bless the fact that there are people like you out there who want to do "the right thing".
 
I realize and I respect the fact that you have no answer to debate my posts so your only resort is to twist the facts of a post I made eons ago. Changing the subject is the best you've got.

Oh I'm sorry. That's funny. I always thought our words mean something. So when you posted that you would rather have a pedophile in office than a Democrat, you were just being funny (because nothing is more amusing than pedophilia)?
 
Back
Top Bottom