Democrats have opened the door for Private Business to do as they please.

[iliveonramen]

Show us examples of Democrats objecting to the wanton censorship of Conservatives on Social Media.

When conservatives are able to handle the responsibility of social media and adhere to terms of service they can use social media. Trump was right, his supporters are “special”

 

[Helix]

There are antitrust laws, yes.

ok, i'll play. which other companies would you like to split up? there are a number of financial and energy companies that might need to be looked at.

 

[ElChupacabra]

Democrats support of Social Media's ability to censor conservatives, to remove the President from using their services, have given the green light to all business owners to say NO to any person or group they disagree with and have an opposing view on any issue.
Now the bakery shop owner has the green light to tell members of the LBGTQ community NO, to baking that wedding cake because they find them dangerous to America, because they disagree with them politically or because their religions teachings oppose a particular stance.
Americans cannot allow this censorship, it is dangerous and unAmerican.

Except that's not what happened.

 

[ElChupacabra]

ok, i'll play. which other companies would you like to split up? there are a number of financial and energy companies that might need to be looked at.

The interesting thing here though, is splitting them up isn't the solution to this particular problem either.

 

[ElChupacabra]

Contract's have not been violated... Big tech just does not like the speech! Censorship plain and simple.

The terms of service were violated. Amazon's ToS prevents applications from posting content that encourages and incites violence, and since they found that kind of content, that was their rationale. Even with a variety of host services available, you're not going to find many without some kind of ToS language against inciting violence; that's more dark web territory.