Dem rep: 'I look forward to' Hannity's testimony

[Conservative]

"Among the 31 states (plus D.C.) with party registration, there are nearly 12 million more registered Democrats than Republicans. 40% of all voters in party registration states are Democrats, 29% are Republicans, and 28% are independents."

It sucks to be in a minority, doesn't it?

And what percentage of those Democrats are radical leftists supporting the slate of announced candidates running for President. Being registered means absolutely nothing as I know the Democratic Candidates that ran in TX ran away from the leftwing ideological agenda promoted by Pelosi, Warren, Schumer, AOC, Sanders. Today's Democratic Party is as I described it and why the Democrats only win local elections like the House races but not statewide elections like the Senate

Now if you want to address the issues of today's Democratic Party, have at it, but not going to continue this off topic discussion by someone who apparently is doing nothing but seeking attention

 

[Idiometer]

What the hell does it mean to be loyal to a FAILED Ideology?? My he gets it like I did, when will you? I grew up a Democrat, was a JFK Democrat and voted for more Democrats in my life than you probably have voted Republican.

Today's Democratic Party doesn't resemble anything I supported or anything JFK promoted. This person was ELECTED in California and his opinion appears to be right on, why are you attacking him instead of addressing the issues raised?

What entitles you to someone else's wealth for your own personal responsibility issues? Why are you so envious of people that you would willingly destroy them? Why is the Trump economic policies so bad for you? What has he done that has hurt you, your family, or the country? Rhetoric means nothing whereas results mean everything

That's not the same thing. This guy PRETENDED to be a Democrat just to get elected. My reply was about HIM, not his opinions.

As for rhetoric, that's your whole reply: rhetoric.

 

[Conservative]

That's not the same thing. This guy PRETENDED to be a Democrat just to get elected. My reply was about HIM, not his opinions.

As for rhetoric, that's your whole reply: rhetoric.

And yet he WAS elected but it does seem that party affiliation means more to you than the actual ideology of the party that is being promoted. I know a lot of Democrats that don't support the radical Democratic Party of today but are still listed as Democrats. Your party has to stand for something not focus on politics of personal destruction and focus on tabloid politics.

Regardless of what you want to believe there are still conservative Democrats in the Democratic Party that are being drowned out by radicalism. This individual's comments are ignored as you want to focus on him not being a Democrat and only posing as one to get elected. That serves no purpose, tell me what in the article do you disagree with? Seems in your world being a Democrat requires one to be 100% supportive of the radicalism now being promoted

 

[Idiometer]

She was and remains incompetent, an American Ambassador was killed and returned home by a Libyan jet. Everything she got was based upon her name as you cannot name one successful program or action she ever created or show any experience in managing or running anything. what is sad is you buy rhetoric and ignore substance. Your personal attacks on Trump are nothing more than someone vindictive and totally lacking in understanding of the politicized actions of the FBI and Justice Department.

Why is this witch hunt a lot more important to you than the benefits being generated for the American people in terms of pocketbook issues?

You don't like Hillary. Duly noted. But that makes her guilty of nothing. We were discussing criminal activity, something you claimed but could not prove.

And if the Mueller investigation, the various cases being prosecuted by the various federal distrcts including SDNY, and the various congressional hearings constitute a witch hunt, then they sure have stumbled into one helluva big coven.

 

[haymarket]

STOP, PLEASE! I can't take any more ... my sides hurt and my voice is fading! And my eyes were already red!

:2rofll:

(And if you can't stop, can I at least have some of whatever you're smoking?)

Conservative inspires me. Glad you appreciate it.

 

[Idiometer]

And what percentage of those Democrats are radical leftists supporting the slate of announced candidates running for President. Being registered means absolutely nothing as I know the Democratic Candidates that ran in TX ran away from the leftwing ideological agenda promoted by Pelosi, Warren, Schumer, AOC, Sanders. Today's Democratic Party is as I described it and why the Democrats only win local elections like the House races but not statewide elections like the Senate

Now if you want to address the issues of today's Democratic Party, have at it, but not going to continue this off topic discussion by someone who apparently is doing nothing but seeking attention

How the heck would I know of any percentages of ideologies within the Democratic party? I'm not even a member, ffs.

Attention-seeking? Yes, of course, when you run out of excuses and what you think are clever comebacks, and have nothing at all to refute another's statements, by all means impugn their motives. Good job.

:clap:

 

[PirateMk1]

Is lying amoral? If so, Trump's supporters who continually excuse his nearly constant lying are, in fact, rationalizing in order to continue to support Trump, with many of their rationalizations sounding something like "Who cares? None of that stuff he's lying about is important. Everybody bull****s, right?" Thus implying that because THEY lie, everyone else does.

Is cheating on your spouse amoral? Is paying off your past dalliances in order to keep them silent while you win an electional amoral?

Do you need more?

That same appeal you made was tried by the Republicans a long time ago, to your side. The gist of the response was thus **** off. So dont be surprised when the Republicans tell you to bugger off. As I said before the man fights. The enemy within is a far greater threat to me than the enemy without. Whine and bitch all you like. The more left screams the better he is doing. I am not interested in half measures or compromise. I would rather see everything burn than be yoked by some do gooder that thinks they know more than me. As for being called amore or otherwise, I dont care, and why should I? The left most certainly doesn't.

 

[PirateMk1]

Let's see if Hannity thinks he can cut Congress' mike if he doesn't like what he is hearing. LOL.

No but he can make them pound sand and remain silent. Make their dog and pony show real boring.

 

[jet57]

Perhaps likely. But it would entail perjury.

...which would keep Hannity in the papers as a - victim of the left-wing radicals...

 

[Conservative]

You don't like Hillary. Duly noted. But that makes her guilty of nothing. We were discussing criminal activity, something you claimed but could not prove.

And if the Mueller investigation, the various cases being prosecuted by the various federal distrcts including SDNY, and the various congressional hearings constitute a witch hunt, then they sure have stumbled into one helluva big coven.

Her record of incompetence is what makes her unlikable. Yes, this is a witch hunt as there has been no evidence of collusion and all the crimes supposed committed do not implicate Trump at all and most of what Cohen said are state and local issues not Congressional or national issues. why is this so important to you and how does getting rid of Trump benefit you and the country?

 

[Conservative]

How the heck would I know of any percentages of ideologies within the Democratic party? I'm not even a member, ffs.

Attention-seeking? Yes, of course, when you run out of excuses and what you think are clever comebacks, and have nothing at all to refute another's statements, by all means impugn their motives. Good job.

:clap:

What you are promoting is that there are more registered Democrats than Republicans, SO WHAT? there is nothing to refute as you have made this personal against the mayor and not the content of what he said. Why is the Trump rhetoric and personality so important to you that it trumps the actual results being generated? Are you better off today than when Trump took office? Most people would have to answer yes

 

[Helix]

During the election, I tried to get 15 minutes of Sean in per day just to see what the crazies were thinking. Yeah, it was head splitting.

I watched him in 2007 to find out if my vote for Ron Paul in the fox news Republican primary poll pissed him off. It did.

 

[Khayembii Communique]

Let's see if Hannity thinks he can cut Congress' mike if he doesn't like what he is hearing. LOL.

First three questions they should ask him under oath:

Question 1: On April 22, 2009, in response to a request by a guest on your show asking you to be waterboarded did you respond "Sure...I’ll do it for charity. I’ll let you do it. I’ll do it for the troops’ families."?
Question 2: Since that taping, have you fulfilled the request and been waterboarded?
Question 3: Did you ever intend to follow through with the request?

 

[calamity]

How the heck would I know of any percentages of ideologies within the Democratic party? I'm not even a member, ffs.

Attention-seeking? Yes, of course, when you run out of excuses and what you think are clever comebacks, and have nothing at all to refute another's statements, by all means impugn their motives. Good job.

:clap:

Most of us are not. WHat Conservative does not seem to understand is almost no one is on board with the nutty agenda we see at CPAC and the crap Trump spews out.

 

[jghiretire]

We really need Keith Olbermann to return to the airwaves.

I have missed him.

 

[jghiretire]

Read this Harvard study on Media Bias. Fox came out the best for balance. I'll remind you there is a difference between news and commentary.

News Coverage of Donald Trump’s First 100 Days - Shorenstein Center

Compared to what??

 

[jghiretire]

He know works for ESPN doing baseball (his first love) - which is something of full circle for him. So apparently he can work with people somewhat.

I readily agree that Olbermann was indeed a polarizing figure who could be many of the negative things you mentioned. But we are fast approaching a status of war with the far right and he is a soldier I want employed in the struggle.

I am being selfish in my desire to see him do politics again. I want to smile broadly and say DAMN STRAIGHT out loud as he rips Trump a new one on an almost daily basis. I want that personal smug satisfaction.

Yep!! That's it.

 

[jghiretire]

not really.

WOW I didn't know Laurence O'Donnell was angry. Sounds pretty reasonable to me. Unlike Limbaugh, Jones, Trump or Coulter.

 

[jghiretire]

It would seem to me the evidence just isn't there, in legal terms. HRC was investigated for over two years by 11 investigations. Even Trey Gowdy couldn't find anything actionable, after a very extensive and exhaustive investigation. And you know he would take her to task in a NY minute, if he could.

My suspicion is the Right Wing media is ginning this stuff up, with no underlying substance to act upon legally.

That's been true for a while.

Remember Pizzagate??

 

[jghiretire]

What the hell does it mean to be loyal to a FAILED Ideology?? My he gets it like I did, when will you? I grew up a Democrat, was a JFK Democrat and voted for more Democrats in my life than you probably have voted Republican.

Today's Democratic Party doesn't resemble anything I supported or anything JFK promoted. This person was ELECTED in California and his opinion appears to be right on, why are you attacking him instead of addressing the issues raised?

What entitles you to someone else's wealth for your own personal responsibility issues? Why are you so envious of people that you would willingly destroy them? Why is the Trump economic policies so bad for you? What has he done that has hurt you, your family, or the country? Rhetoric means nothing whereas results mean everything

What entitles you to judge those with less? Why are you so disdainful that you would destroy them?? Trump et all cozy up to Russia and NK. Says KJU didn't know about Otto Warmbier and believes Putin over his own intel. Sorry, that's not someone to look up to - unless you're happy with dictators and torture. But let's talk about morality? Phhtt

 

[jghiretire]

She was and remains incompetent, an American Ambassador was killed and returned home by a Libyan jet. Everything she got was based upon her name as you cannot name one successful program or action she ever created or show any experience in managing or running anything. what is sad is you buy rhetoric and ignore substance. Your personal attacks on Trump are nothing more than someone vindictive and totally lacking in understanding of the politicized actions of the FBI and Justice Department.

Why is this witch hunt a lot more important to you than the benefits being generated for the American people in terms of pocketbook issues?

How many men has Trump killed now?? Conveniently you don't mention his bungling.
Talking about a witch hunt?? WOW dug into that Trump is wonderful and Hillary bad. But please tell me again about this TDS bs.

 

[Checkerboard Strangler]

There's also an additional extraneous reaction, that's predicated upon step 3:

If 3a, the perjurer is demonized as a liar and cheat - by the President and remaining supporting players.

If 3b, the perjurer is exalted as a hero and appears to be pardon bound.

In other words, most mob movies, most episodes of Breaking Bad, most real life accurate depictions of organized crime activity.

 

[Chomsky]

That's been true for a while.

Remember Pizzagate??

Yeah, one of the responses to my comment there on Hillary was something to the effect of:

"Forget Hillary, and don't hide behind her. What about the 'others'"

And my thought was: "I though Hillary was the biggest and pre-eminent boogeyman of theirs; so now I need to read their minds?"

It just strikes me as so much nonsense. Now they're chasing socialists and hamburger confiscation. I kid you not. At CPAC convention, in another thread.

 

[jghiretire]

You don't like Hillary. Duly noted. But that makes her guilty of nothing. We were discussing criminal activity, something you claimed but could not prove.

And if the Mueller investigation, the various cases being prosecuted by the various federal distrcts including SDNY, and the various congressional hearings constitute a witch hunt, then they sure have stumbled into one helluva big coven.

Haven't they tho???
[video]https://pics.me.me/investigating-the-russian-hacking-is-a-political-witch-hunt-says-29156251.png[/video]

 

[DarkWizard12]

The way it appears to work with these people is:

Step 1) Trump associate commits perjury (you cannot skip this step in the process).
Step 2) Trump associate gets indicted, threatened with indictment, and/or finally sentenced to prison for perjury.
Step 3) Trump associate tells the truth.
Alternate step 3) Trump associate continues to commit perjury.
Step 4 in response to alternate step 3) Trump associate goes to prison for a super long time.

If there has been an exception to this sequence of events, I'd like to hear it.

Well, for someone like hannity, you don't think there would be a pardon waiting for him?