• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

DeLay Touts DOJ Decision to End 'Weak' Probe Into Ties to Lobbyist (1 Viewer)

texmaster

Hippie Hater
DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 24, 2009
Messages
3,969
Reaction score
1,209
Location
Dallas TEXAS
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
Obviously they considered hounding out of office was sufficient.
Why go through a long and expensive trial when the verdict would be in so much doubt?
 
Former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay declared Monday that he had been "exonerated" after the Justice Department informed him it had ended its six-year criminal investigation into his ties to former lobbyist Jack Abramoff.

If the evidence was so good against him why did they drop the charges?

FOXNews.com - DeLay Touts DOJ Decision to End 'Weak' Probe Into Ties to Lobbyist

Files this under:

OJ Simpson - acquitted for murder
Michael Jackson - acquitted for child molestation
Tom Delay - walks on corruption charges
 
If the evidence was so good against him why did they drop the charges?

Maybe because powerful people and people with powerful friends get away with crap all the time.

Maybe the President said, "Oh, enough already."

Who the hell knows?

Who the hell cares? :lol:
 
This guy is such an asshole.

He claimed that he took lobbyist paid trips to save the tax payers money.

No, dummy, you're supposed to pay for golf out of your own pocket.

Another one who represents everything that is wrong with politics.

Why couldn't the 9/11 plane have landed on K-Street?
 
Its amusing looking at well known liberals wanting to dsimiss the fact they didn't even have enough evidence to even go to trail despite all the boogyman talk about this man years ago.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom