• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Deal OKs bill requiring drug testing for welfare recipients

TheDemSocialist

Gradualist
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 13, 2011
Messages
34,951
Reaction score
16,311
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Socialist

Read more: RN-T.com - Deal OKs bill requiring drug testing for welfare recipients

Gonna be yet another giant waste of money. Nothing but a giant pointless waste of money

Thoughts?
Comments?
Response?
 
I am in favor of this for those on the dole, but I would include politicians.
 
I support very stringent requirements for receiving government aid, specifically aid to those capable of acquiring advanced employment if not for a lack of education. Drug testing is only one such requirement I would like to see implemented on a grand scale. It should be easier and less time consuming for people to seek education and find suitable, legitimate income than to apply for and receive government entitlements. In line with making it obligatory that an adult seeking aid be able to pass a drug test, I fully support mandatory enrollment into a field of study for which an employee deficit exists, paid for via government grants, and mandatory volunteer services in the recipient's municipality.
 
Just more feel-good laws. You know how to pass a drug test? Don't take any drugs! Pass the test. Buy some drugs. Not very complicated.

I fully support mandatory enrollment into a field of study for which an employee deficit exists, paid for via government grants, and mandatory volunteer services in the recipient's municipality.
would be a much better investment but who needs logic?
 
I remember seeing a study saying that doing this costs the state more money than it saves. Thanks for wasting my money!!
 
Read more: RN-T.com - Deal OKs bill requiring drug testing for welfare recipients

Gonna be yet another giant waste of money. Nothing but a giant pointless waste of money

Thoughts?
Comments?
Response? [/FONT][/COLOR][/LEFT]

It's a giant, pointless waste of money for sure. I would much rather we look at our interventionist wars, our pandering to banks and wallstreet at the expense of middle and lower class America, the overextending of government force against the free exercise of our rights and liberties, etc.

Welfare people using drugs are not very high on the priority list. When it is, we will be in a good place.
 
Remember how Florida's law came out?
 
Yea the law generally applies to the applicant and not the household.
Most often a female applies for benefits, with a live in male partner, who would be more likely to fail the test.
 
I am in favor of this for those on the dole, but I would include politicians.

Why? So we can waste more money? We already know that politicians waste our taxpayer dollars by going on all-expenses paid trips to "conference" with their fellow politicians and lobbyist. Them being on drugs is the least of my worries.
 
I have no problem with people whose lives suck taking drugs to make those lives more bearable. Sometimes you need a pick me up. I do not get this hang up some people have against certain kinds of highs. We spend our lives in search of highs. Love and sex are two of the most prominent. Power and excitement work, too. We ban weed because people get high from it, should be ban roller coasters, too? They both produce a rush using brain chemicals. What's the difference? Life is too short not to enjoy every moment of it that you can.
 
I'm going to start selling my urine!
 
Read more: RN-T.com - Deal OKs bill requiring drug testing for welfare recipients

Gonna be yet another giant waste of money. Nothing but a giant pointless waste of money

Thoughts?
Comments?
Response? [/FONT][/COLOR][/LEFT]

Good for Georgia. People are always complaining about those on welfare buying pop and what not but when it comes to drugs its all "OH NO YOU DON'T!". Drugs are bad period. If you want to limit people on the type of food they can buy then I have absolutely no problem limiting people that want to do drugs from getting welfare.
 

Agreed. I think that in order to get welfare money, you need to be in school, learning a trade, you need to be drug-free and you need to be out working at least some of the day, even if it's digging ditches, to earn your money. You'd have less people on welfare if you had to go sweat to get it.
 
Just more feel-good laws. You know how to pass a drug test? Don't take any drugs! Pass the test. Buy some drugs. Not very complicated.

That's why drug tests are random and often.
 
When considering that people on drugs no longer receive welfare, it pays for itself.

Starve children because mom smoked a joint? I don't think so. Let me guess, they'll take the kids away and pay foster homes to take in those kids. It won't pay for itself. I imagine crime would spike too.
 
Just more feel-good laws.
Yep. Honestly, it's a waste of time. It's a waste of resources. It's also a diversion from real problems that they cannot solve, as it appeals to our collective need to feel superior, and too many otherwise intelligent people fall for it.
 
Starve children because mom smoked a joint? I don't think so. Let me guess, they'll take the kids away and pay foster homes to take in those kids. It won't pay for itself. I imagine crime would spike too.

OH look..another "THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!!" post. :roll: Maybe if mom spent money on food instead of that joint the kids wouldn't "starve"? Maybe if mom hadn't smoked that joint then she would have gotten that assistance?

WTH happened to the concept of personal responsibility in this nation?
 

Would you like to give the government the power to sterilize irresponsible people?
 
Starve children because mom smoked a joint? I don't think so. Let me guess, they'll take the kids away and pay foster homes to take in those kids. It won't pay for itself. I imagine crime would spike too.

It's called being responsible. I know you liberals don't have a clue what that means.
 
Would you like to give the government the power to sterilize irresponsible people?

Maybe you could just answer the question instead of running around waving your arms.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…