• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

DEA and other law enforcement round up 50 illegal aliens in Denver

I have just one question.
All the folks on here that want all the illegals to stay,how many of them have you volunteered to sponsor and put up in your home?
 
White colege educated Progressive women across the country are panicking over the prospect of having to scrub their own toilets.

Meanwhile their husbands are fretting over the shortage of young children to have sex with that's coming.

Dark days ahead for the left
 
This is part of a good start for Trump's deportation program. Let's hope they can keep it on the rails.

Boston ICE had similar success, and it's really exposing the dark side of blue state sanctuary policies. One deportee from Boston had -- I kid you not -- 17 convictions on various assault, battery, weapon, and drug charges. Think about that for a second, this man was:
  1. In the country illegally
  2. Tried and convicted on 17 felony charges, many of them violent crimes.
  3. Inexplicably, walking the streets of Boston.

This is how warped the left's thinking on immigration policy has become. After, say, the first conviction of a violent crime, no one -- not the cops, not the DA, not the judge -- decided to act on the thought "Maybe we should call ICE on this one?"

Dereliction of duty doesn't even begin to describe the MA justice system in this matter, and it sounds like MA does not stand alone in this regard.
 
And what you perhaps fail to realize is that your unwillingness to acknowledge this as a victory for Trump makes you part of the show. ;)

Or, more to the point, a victory for AMERICA and AMERICAN CITIZENS.
 
And what you perhaps fail to realize is that your unwillingness to acknowledge this as a victory for Trump makes you part of the show. ;)
I'd rather it be a victory for the US, not one man. Plus, Trump wasn't there.

Do you think the DEA and ICE were just twiddling their thumbs until Trump became president?
 
I'd rather it be a victory for the US, not one man. Plus, Trump wasn't there.

It is. Illegal aliens being deported. In this case, dangerous illegal aliens. A win for America and you are unhappy about it.


Do you think the DEA and ICE were just twiddling their thumbs until Trump became president?

We think that with Biden and Harris at the helm, that the vibe coming down from teh top, was to just go though the motions, for the cameras to fool the stupid voters.


Now, the vibe coming down it, to get ****ing serious.
 
They won't acknowledge that either as it would mean acknowledging Trump made the victory possible.

That's the thing about zealots. They will never give an inch.


His wording on that was careful. note, he said, he would "rather" it be a win for America. But yes, he didn't say that it WAS, a win for America.


Becuase yes, they are all zealots.
 
In some cases, yes, because they were not being called in when there were opportunities to act. See post 10.
I notice you didn't back post 10 with any references.
 
It is. Illegal aliens being deported. In this case, dangerous illegal aliens. A win for America and you are unhappy about it.

I am? What words did I use to lead you to that false conclusion?

Likely just projection, as usual.
 
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
???

If I make claims, I typically back them up with references. People should not believe me, and I tend not to believe other forum members unless they can bring facts.
 
I am? What words did I use to lead you to that false conclusion?

Likely just projection, as usual.


Look at your post.

"MAGA PORN".


Why is it MAGA porn and not porn for you too, if it is a win for all America?


You could have even done something like, "MAGA PORN, though I admit this is a win for America.".


BUt, nope. NOthing but butthurt.
 
???

If I make claims, I typically back them up with references. People should not believe me, and I tend not to believe other forum members unless they can bring facts.


He discussed the example of hte guy with 17 charges.


Dude....seriously. This is a time of maga wins. YOu are going to have to not live in denial, if you want to be taken seriously.
 
Look at your post.

"MAGA PORN".


Why is it MAGA porn and not porn for you too, if it is a win for all America?


You could have even done something like, "MAGA PORN, though I admit this is a win for America.".


BUt, nope. NOthing but butthurt.
This is some weird shit. Of course this shouldn't be "porn" for anyone let alone MAGA.

Is this your porn then, is that what you are saying?

And the butthurt thing, where does that come from?

Oh yeah, just more projection.
 
Back
Top Bottom