David Hancock, who had acted as spokesman for Kyle Rittenhouse and the Rittenhouse family, comes clean about who Kyle really is.

[Buckeyes85]

Oh, well that makes it all better then.

His irrelevant minutia reminds me of the dialogue between famed criminal defense attorney Vincent Laguardia Gambini and his fiancé Mona Lisa Vito, wondering if he was wearing the right color pants to go deer hunting:

"Imagine you're a deer. You're prancing along, you get thirsty, you spot a little brook, you put your little deer lips down to the cool clear water... BAM! A f'in bullet rips off part of your head! Your brains are laying on the ground in little bloody pieces! Now I ask ya'. Would you give a f**k what kind of pants the son of a bitch who shot you was wearing?"

 

[BlueTex]

There is a full thread of the trial. Go there for what actually went on.

Kyle has more trials to go... You are going to see a LOT more evidence in the civil trials than we saw during the criminal trial.

 

[j brown's body]

Anybody taking a gun out to kill people ain't right in the head.

 

[RF667799]

He shouldn't have been there in the first place.

That sounds like making an excuse for someone attacking him.

 

[RF667799]

What part of his handlers statement about this violent punk choosing to stay an uneducated violent punk don't you get? He's not an "underpriviledged youngster". He's a stupid punk and a thug, and he apparently likes himself that way. He'll end up in jail where he belongs before too long.

So? All I see is that you have a highly emotional take on someone you don't even know. There are millions like him, no matter what he is.

 

[RF667799]

I hate liars. This dickbag got away with killing people and now wants to make money off being a victim.

**** him

"Got away with killing people" is certainly one way to characterize successfully defending oneself using lethal force.

 

[RF667799]

Good. Now you understand that my argument has nothing to do with self-defense.

17-year-olds aren't interested in going to Trump rallies alone. That's a fact. Rittenhouse had no training in how to use the weapon much less any training in crowd control. Fact. Rittenhouse had never been to a riot. Fact. I would never want to have to trust Rittenhouse with my life. Fact. YMMV.

The case is ancient history, Kyle is free, and he's still trying to stick his neck where it doesn't belong. The kid needs to stop, shut up, and learn a thing or two about adulthood. That's the point. That's the OP. That's the argument.

And tell him to stay off your lawn while you're at it.

 

[LouC]

Anything that would be negative and newly exposed about little Kyle the Man Killer will not likely be a surprise to me.

 

[Plasmaball]

"Got away with killing people" is certainly one way to characterize successfully defending oneself using lethal force.

1st guy you don't know what happened. It was all off camera. .
Skate board dude not so much.
Guy with he gun yeah sure.

He killed the first guy who only had a plastic bag

 

[Michael Cole]

And tell him to stay off your lawn while you're at it.

You are confused. This is where you present an argument. You have none. Are you emotionally attached to Kyle?

In a life and death situation, Kyle would be nowhere near me. But since you love him, good luck.

 

[RF667799]

Yep. You love Kyle. Sad.


We're discussing Kyle Rittenhouse and his behavior post-acquittal. Snap out of it. Nobody is arguing self-defense. Only you. Divert less.


I haven't seen any name-calling. I've called him Kyle Rittenhouse. You need to direct your complaints to those doing the act.

You're still running on fumes. Totally incapable of criticizing Kyle Rittenhouse. Do you love him?

"Stupid...dumb...phony...fraud...idiot..." There are likely more.

If you're just going to lie, you already lost whatever point you're trying to make.

 

[LouC]

"Got away with killing people" is certainly one way to characterize successfully defending oneself using lethal force.

He did get away with killing people.

Little Kyle left his house and went all the way there looking for some reason to get to use deadly force.

He was on a hunt.

He bagged his trophies.

Man's law allowed it.

He got away with it.

 

[RF667799]

Except for that first post where you did.

I attacked the people who wallow in hatred? Are there any here?

 

[RF667799]

His irrelevant minutia reminds me of the dialogue between famed criminal defense attorney Vincent Laguardia Gambini and his fiancé Mona Lisa Vito, wondering if he was wearing the right color pants to go deer hunting:

"Imagine you're a deer. You're prancing along, you get thirsty, you spot a little brook, you put your little deer lips down to the cool clear water... BAM! A f'in bullet rips off part of your head! Your brains are laying on the ground in little bloody pieces! Now I ask ya'. Would you give a f**k what kind of pants the son of a bitch who shot you was wearing?"

As if the opinion of a deer means anything. The whole point of the scene was the comedic effect of both sides of that discussion.

 

[Michael Cole]

"Stupid...dumb...phony...fraud...idiot..." There are likely more.

Those are descriptions of his behavior and character.

Sleepy Joe is name calling. Nasty Nancy is name calling. Brandon is name calling. Trump has millions of 'em. Me, none.

You are seeing things that aren't there. Does my accurate description of Kyle hurt your feelings? I'm not getting the attachment.

If you're just going to lie, you already lost whatever point you're trying to make.

I haven't lied. Your misuse of the English language is on you. Don't get so butthurt over some idiot little adolescent you'll never meet.

 

[roguenuke]

Why? Myself, I don't go for that attacking people shit.

You compared people to "a dog enjoying a shit pile" and calling them "haters" in your first post, the very second post of this thread. That is in fact "attacking people".

 

[RF667799]

You are confused. This is where you present an argument. You have none. Are you emotionally attached to Kyle?

In a life and death situation, Kyle would be nowhere near me. But since you love him, good luck.

What position am I supposed to argue? This repetitive strawman about whether I love him or have some other emotional attachment to him? How ridiculous.

I do think some people have an emotional investment in him. In him personally.

Minus the self defense aspect, all we have is a random kid that people want to grouse about, call names, and libel because they don't think he's leading the life they think he should.

 

[JRTurner]

That sounds like making an excuse for someone attacking him.

Nope. Just talking reality.

 

[RF667799]

Those are descriptions of his behavior and character.

Sleepy Joe is name calling. Nasty Nancy is name calling. Brandon is name calling. Trump has millions of 'em. Me, none.

You are seeing things that aren't there. Does my accurate description of Kyle hurt your feelings? I'm not getting the attachment.


I haven't lied. Your misuse of the English language is on you. Don't get so butthurt over some idiot little adolescent you'll never meet.

Yeah, name calling often comes down to someone's subjective assessment of the character of another. Would you directly call another poster here one of those "descriptions"?

 

[RF667799]

Nope. Just talking reality.

Would that be your comment about someone raped at a party? They shouldn't have been there?

 

[Michael Cole]

What position am I supposed to argue?

Kyle's brilliance? You could say, "Kyle is so smart, he don't need no stinkin' education.

This repetitive strawman about whether I love him or have some other emotional attachment to him? How ridiculous.

Yes, getting butthurt over Kyle Rittenhouse is ridiculous.

I do think some people have an emotional investment in him. In him personally.

Indeed. You can't say a bad word about him. Do you think it's wise for Kyle to flip off a paid education?

Minus the self defense aspect, all we have is a random kid that people want to grouse about, call names, and libel because they don't think he's leading the life they think he should.

What we have is an idiot kid who never grew up.

 

[RF667799]

You compared people to "a dog enjoying a shit pile" and calling them "haters" in your first post, the very second post of this thread. That is in fact "attacking people".

I have it on good authority that is just describing actions.

 

[Michael Cole]

Yeah, name calling often comes down to someone's subjective assessment of the character of another. Would you directly call another poster here one of those "descriptions"?

Blah blah blah. My bike needs a battery and I'm going to the Aces game at 2. You have fun with this nonsense. Praise Kyle!!! Smh.

 

[RF667799]

Kyle's brilliance? You could say, "Kyle is so smart, he don't need no stinkin' education.

I could. I could say anything. I didn't say that though. Strawman.

Yes, getting butthurt over Kyle Rittenhouse is ridiculous.

I've pointed out the self defense aspect, and noted the apparent butthurt of others- which some seem determined to demonstrate as we speak.

Indeed. You can't say a bad word about him. Do you think it's wise for Kyle to flip off a paid education?

I really wasn't aware of that, but no... I don't think it's wise. I see a lot of people do shit I don't think is wise, though.

What we have is an idiot kid who never grew up.

It really appears that this thread was only intended to be as I earlier speculated, and anything of substance need not enter.

That's okay. There are periodicals and books devoted to this weird idea that it's necessary to find someone to hate on.

 

[RF667799]

Blah blah blah. My bike needs a battery and I'm going to the Aces game at 2. You have fun with this nonsense. Praise Kyle!!! Smh.

Brush the straw off before you leave....