D.C. grabs guns from soldier

[jet57]

you claimed I never lectured at an accredited law school. if you don't have a law degree than your comment is based on pure ignorance because without a law degree you could not possibly make such a claim

I don't think I ever claimed that - you did, and apparently it wasn't the truth or you might have named these "accredited schools and the topics you lectured on when I challenged you on it.

But, the mods are gonna get pissed if you and Hashaw don't go back to topic, and I'd rather not get yelled at.

Anything else of subtance on the topic?

 

[Harshaw]

When I get tired, I just switch computers. I suppose you smoke around cameras too . . . don't you.

I have no idea what this incoherent babbling is supposed to refer to, but I've never smoked at all.

Now, can we please get back to the topic of thread? I proved Turtledude wrong; what do you have to say on the subject?

What I have to say is what I did say; you don't have any idea what you're talking about. As usual. You know nothing -- NOTHING -- about the Constitution. You've continually said some of the most bizarre and inane horsepuckey about it, I can't even imagine where you get it from. Voices, maybe.

 

[jet57]

I have no idea what this incoherent babbling is supposed to refer to, but I've never smoked at all.




What I have to say is what I did say; you don't have any idea what you're talking about. As usual. You know nothing -- NOTHING -- about the Constitution. You've continually said some of the most bizarre and inane horsepuckey about it, I can't even imagine where you get it from. Voices, maybe.

So, you're just gong to troll then.

 

[TurtleDude]

So, you're just gong to troll then.

speaking of upsetting the mods

but tell us, where did congress properly get the power to regulate small arms

if I bought a gun 20 years ago and it has remained in ohio how can it possibly be claimed to affect interstate commerce

 

[Centinel]

speaking of upsetting the mods

but tell us, where did congress properly get the power to regulate small arms

if I bought a gun 20 years ago and it has remained in ohio how can it possibly be claimed to affect interstate commerce

Oh Turtlesque one, the flapping of a butterfly's wings effect commerce on the other side of the world. We are all interconnected. When you fart, it effects commerce in Hawaii, don't you know?

 

[jet57]

speaking of upsetting the mods

but tell us, where did congress properly get the power to regulate small arms

if I bought a gun 20 years ago and it has remained in ohio how can it possibly be claimed to affect interstate commerce

Buying, selling and transporting comes under the commerce clause. All other regulations; which is what I think you're referring to, have been brought by states and federal laws since that time. Now, if you violate the laws requiring transport of firearms, then you're in the wrong: that's what happened to that soldier. we cleared that up some time ago, so I'm not sure what your angle is in trying to bring it up again . . .

 

[Matt Foley]

100 pound 12 year old Bob Shuley won the world 12 G skeet championship in the early 60's shooting a Remington PUMP gun (no recoil reduction on those babies) with a 250 X 250. He was on a team with me that won the US international skeet championship open team title (beating Army's Marksmanship unit and the Marines' shooting team)

mmmhmmmm. So it won't hurt if I wack you on the shoulder with a baseball bat.

Aintchu also a "constitutional scholar". mmmhmmmm

 

[jet57]

mmmhmmmm. So it won't hurt if I wack you on the shoulder with a baseball bat.

Aintchu also a "constitutional scholar". mmmhmmmm

Yes, and he gives lectures on law at colleges: accredited ones too; just ask'em

 

[Harshaw]

you claimed I never lectured at an accredited law school. if you don't have a law degree than your comment is based on pure ignorance because without a law degree you could not possibly make such a claim

I don't think I ever claimed that

Of course you did:

And I still don't believe that you lecture on law at any college.

 

[Karl]

Of course you did:

No he didn't. He said he didn't believe it. I don't believe it either, especially since TurtleDude intentionally misrepresented his original words:

There are no acknowledged limitations in the 10th Amendment, and I very seriously doubt this claim of you lecturing at any "accredited law school". Lastly, the commerce clause came before the 10th Amendment.

does NOT necessarily = "you claimed I never lectured at an accredited law school". It simply means that the preponderance of evidence at hand does not support the claim, which is in and of itself irrelevant since --

-- it employs a logical fallacy (appeal to authority) to attempt to make his argument superior by simply claiming superior knowledge/experience/qualifications. In the world of debate, "I'm more educated on the subject than you are, because I say so, which means that I'm right and you're wrong" is a fail... despite how winning it may be on a schoolyard playground.

But as usual, debates around here devolve into ego contests by certain posters who claim fame and fortune in real life as if that had any intellectual value whatsoever in an actual debate. That, and that alone, tends to debunk their claims of intellectual superiority.

 

[Harshaw]

No he didn't. He said he didn't believe it. I don't believe it either, especially since TurtleDude intentionally misrepresented his original words:



does NOT necessarily = "you claimed I never lectured at an accredited law school". It simply means that the preponderance of evidence at hand does not support the claim, which is in and of itself irrelevant since --

-- it employs a logical fallacy (appeal to authority) to attempt to make his argument superior by simply claiming superior knowledge/experience/qualifications. In the world of debate, "I'm more educated on the subject than you are, because I say so, which means that I'm right and you're wrong" is a fail... despite how winning it may be on a schoolyard playground.

But as usual, debates around here devolve into ego contests by certain posters who claim fame and fortune in real life as if that had any intellectual value whatsoever in an actual debate. That, and that alone, tends to debunk their claims of intellectual superiority.

Oh, right; he didn't claim it wasn't done; he only said he doesn't believe it was done.

:lamo

Thanks for playing, Karl. Charmed, as always.

(By the way, what he did was misread TD. Can you figure out how?)

 

[jet57]

Of course you did:

Uh, he claimed that he lectured at colleges; I said I didn't believe it. I didn't claim he didn't. I still don't believe it and he's obviously not being truthful about such a claim.

 

[Harshaw]

Uh, he claimed that he lectured at colleges; I said I didn't believe it. I didn't claim he didn't. I still don't believe it and he's obviously not being truthful about such a claim.

But you're not claiming he didn't do it. :lamo

Why did you even bother posting?

 

[Karl]

Thanks for playing, Karl. Charmed, as always.

(By the way, what he did was misread TD. Can you figure out how?)

Don't care how. I was addressing your misrepresentation, which you are now trying to deflect from by changing the subject. As always.

 

[Harshaw]

Don't care how. I was addressing your misrepresentation, which you are now trying to deflect from by changing the subject. As always.

"As always." :lamo As though you can point to previous examples.

It's not a "misrepresentation" at all, and any honest reader would agree.

 

[TurtleDude]

mmmhmmmm. So it won't hurt if I wack you on the shoulder with a baseball bat.

Aintchu also a "constitutional scholar". mmmhmmmm

yeah and I also was a world class skeet shooter,

 

[TurtleDude]

But you're not claiming he didn't do it. :lamo

Why did you even bother posting?

Its idiocy compounded in those posts of his

 

[jet57]

But you're not claiming he didn't do it. :lamo

Why did you even bother posting?

Why do you bother posting? I mean - really! You've got some sort of personal difficulty going on and you're really just trolling now.

 

[jet57]

Its idiocy compounded in those posts of his

Hey; I'm not lying about "lecturing law" at accredited colleges . . .

Now, again; can we get back to topic?

 

[Harshaw]

Why do you bother posting? I mean - really! You've got some sort of personal difficulty going on and you're really just trolling now.

:2bigcry:

Then perhaps you shouldn't have said it so many times, dude. You're the one who made the big deal out of it. If it's "off-topic," you're the one who took it there.

 

[Matt Foley]

yeah and I also was a world class skeet shooter,

I'm a world class in a class of my own buddy boy, and a world class Libertarian shooter. I like to, "pow pow," shoot them Libertarians in a world class event.

 

[TurtleDude]

I'm a world class in a class of my own buddy boy, and a world class Libertarian shooter. I like to, "pow pow," shoot them Libertarians in a world class event.

why clutter up the thread with such nonsense. You seem to suggest you want to shoot people. Better seek some help

 

[Matt Foley]

why clutter up the thread with such nonsense. You seem to suggest you want to shoot people. Better seek some help

I couldn't think of anything with the phrase "world class" or "accredited" in the context of marketing cliches or internet creds. My imagination was running low, don't hate me.

 

[d0gbreath]

The Cops need to give this man his guns back. He is obviously an exception to the rule. Even if they fine him, they must return his property. I'm really sick of Police departments confiscation rules. Godwin belongs here.

 

[Matt Foley]

The Cops need to give this man his guns back. He is obviously an exception to the rule. Even if they fine him, they must return his property. I'm really sick of Police departments confiscation rules. Godwin belongs here.

From what I read he is not the exception to the rule, cops grab more guns from law abiding normal people than the abnormals.