KidRocks
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2005
- Messages
- 1,337
- Reaction score
- 16
- Location
- right here
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
stsburns said:And I care what they think why? Because they are put up on a pedistal and given a bloated paycheck, I AM SUPPOSED TO RESPECT THEIR OPINION?
I didn't say that! I don't have a problem with them having an opinion, I just don't like it when the media exploits them to support a cause, no matter the politics! and they don't know me so I don't give an "F!"KidRocks said:And just because they are put on a pedestal and receive a bloated paycheck that they are to remain silent? Without opinion or stance? Give them a break will ya?
They probably value and respect your opinion very much.
stsburns said:I didn't say that! I don't have a problem with them having an opinion, I just don't like it when the media exploits them to support a cause, no matter the politics! and they don't know me so I don't give an "F!"
I do dislike the media! You read me right! I do not have much of a problem the freedom of speech, but its use?KidRocks said:So am I to assume that you are of the ilk that hates the "media"? That hates 'Freedom of Speech"?
KidRocks said:Well well...
Is nothing sacred? Is there any segment of the population that President Bush has not managed to anger or offend?
Nope!
KidRocks said:And just because they are put on a pedestal and receive a bloated paycheck that they are to remain silent? Without opinion or stance? Give them a break will ya?
They probably value and respect your opinion very much.
What bugs me is that multiple stars, who make billions and billions, donated $$ when September 11th occurred. That day, Sandra Bullock and Julia Roberts announced that they were donating $ 1 Million and maybe 2 Million. I wanted to see similar donations occur after Katrina. I didn't see that, but did I miss something?
oldreliable67 said:Assuming that they did not make similar donations after Katrina - I have no idea whether they did or didn't - why on earth does that 'bug' you?
Hoot said:Well, well...looks like the Dixie Chicks were ahead of their time, doesn't it? LOL
Pacridge said:The Dixie who?
Seriously I live in a rural area. My two radio station choices are country or country/Rush Limbaugh et el mix. For some reason a couple years ago the Chicks seemingly disappeared from the face of the earth. No more "Good-bye Earl."
Wonder if Tim and Faith will suffer in kind?
The honeymoon is over between Bush and the GOP. The party members that are up for re-election are breaking ranks to try and keep their seats. Why? You don't put distance between you and someone who is doing well. Therefore, it is completely logical to assume Bush has warn out his "welcome mat" with his own neocon constituents. Which, incidentally, won't save the neocon agenda. You folks are going down the tubes politically. Everyone has seen your "whole card", everyone knows their is only two things the neocon's excel at, 1) Intolerance and 2) Arrogance.Originally posted by KCConservative:
Someone exercises their right to free speech and Kidrocks wants us to think it's news worthy. Let him have his fun. Without party direction or a viable candidate, it's all he's got.
Billo_Really said:The honeymoon is over between Bush and the GOP. The party members that are up for re-election are breaking ranks to try and keep their seats. Why? You don't put distance between you and someone who is doing well. Therefore, it is completely logical to assume Bush has warn out his "welcome mat" with his own neocon constituents. Which, incidentally, won't save the neocon agenda. You folks are going down the tubes politically. Everyone has seen your "whole card", everyone knows their is only two things the neocon's excel at, 1) Intolerance and 2) Arrogance.
And now this country has had enough. Your party is as popular as Hitler at a barmitzva.
What's wrong with Mardi Gras?Originally posted by GySgt:
Horse ****. More scapegoating.
They have been given federal funding. Seems to me that New Orleans and Louisiana are more concerned with Mardi Gras than cleaning up their little city. The President of the United States cannot infringe upon private businesses and contracts of corporate organizations that are involved with the cleanup.
It's really funny how people like to drag the President through the mud with regards to their "failing" and "destroyed" civil rights (enter pathetic whimper here), then they drag the President through that same mud for not infringing on civil rights in New Orleans.
This would be the true test to tell whether or not you are a partisan political slave or a true liberal.
"Political slavery" is for people with weak minds and no balls.Originally posted by GySgt:
Political slavery. This would be a good example.
Billo_Really said:The honeymoon is over between Bush and the GOP. The party members that are up for re-election are breaking ranks to try and keep their seats. Why? You don't put distance between you and someone who is doing well. Therefore, it is completely logical to assume Bush has warn out his "welcome mat" with his own neocon constituents. Which, incidentally, won't save the neocon agenda. You folks are going down the tubes politically. Everyone has seen your "whole card", everyone knows their is only two things the neocon's excel at, 1) Intolerance and 2) Arrogance.
And now this country has had enough. Your party is as popular as Hitler at a barmitzva.
Billo_Really said:What's wrong with Mardi Gras?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?