YoungConserv
DP Veteran
- Joined
- May 13, 2012
- Messages
- 3,083
- Reaction score
- 601
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Have you read the 1000 pages plus, bill?? The fact we have "non democrats" offering amendments to make it more palatable is carrying water for a HORRIBLE piece of legislation.
The amendment the senator offered is simple and straight to the point but is causing some argument in DC. I looked it over and did not see anything rnherientltly wrong with it, take a look and tell me what you think?
(A) not earlier than 9 years and 6 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary and the Commissioner of United States Customs and Border Protection jointly submit to the President and Congress a written certification, including a comprehensive report detailing the data, methodologies, and reasoning justifying such certification, that certifies, under penalty of perjury, that –
(i) the Secretary has achieved and maintained full situational awareness of the Southern border for the 12-month period immediately preceding such certification;
(ii) the Secretary has achieved and maintained operational control of the Southern border for the 12-month period immediately preceding such certification;
(iii) the Secretary has implemented the mandatory employment verification system required by section 274A of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1324a), as amended by section 3101 of this Act, for use by all employers to prevent unauthorized workers from obtaining employment in the United States; and
(iv) the Secretary has implemented a biometric entry and exit data system at all airports and seaports at which U.S. Customs and Border Protection personnel were deployed on the date of the enactment of this Act, and in accordance with the requirements set forth in section 7208 of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (8 U.S.C. 1365b)
That's the whole point of the amendment the security comes first they have to show control of the border for a year befor legalization can take place.And after the 12-20 million plus illegals have their legal status the Cornyn Amendment and any other enforcement measured gets revoked or neutered and in twenty years from now our illegal immigration problem has tripled while the same traitorous scum in office propose another sucker the American people into another amnesty just like they did with the Reagan Amnesty.
And once they have legal status then that border control can be revoked or neutered. Its not the before part people should worry about, it the after part people should worry about.Its like little Timmy telling little Suzie he will leave her alone if she gives him her cookie.All little Timmy has to do is leave little Suzie alone until he gets her cookie.Because once he gets her cookie and eats it then there is absolutely nothing in the world Suzie can do to prevent little Timmy from picking on her because that cookie is gone.I do not see pro-illegal immigration or even anti-illegal immigration politicians revoking legal status just because border security and any other enforcements provisions were removed or neutered.That's the whole point of the amendment the security comes first they have to show control of the border for a year befor legalization can take place.
Have you read the 1000 pages plus, bill?? The fact we have "non democrats" offering amendments to make it more palatable is carrying water for a HORRIBLE piece of legislation.
No doubt but if its gonna get shoved down our throats we might as well limit the damage
That's the whole point of the amendment the security comes first they have to show control of the border for a year befor legalization can take place.
The amendment the senator offered is simple and straight to the point but is causing some argument in DC. I looked it over and did not see anything rnherientltly wrong with it, take a look and tell me what you think?
You could try reading the bill instead of just regurgitating GOP catch phrases, it might give you some insight.
This amendment has an impossible standard: "full situational awareness" in anything is impossible.
Do you know what the "biometric entry and exist system" would entail?
The amendment the senator offered is simple and straight to the point but is causing some argument in DC. I looked it over and did not see anything rnherientltly wrong with it, take a look and tell me what you think?
...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?