Sanctuary cities are actually guilty of harboring criminals. That is against the law. If a private citizen did it they would be arrested.
So what are they doing that would get a private citizen arrested? And my second question...…..are you smart enough to understand you are wrong? We will see. LMAO!
But I am not wrong. Harboring a criminal is a crime.
The question is when is the US ATTY Generals office going to nail the cities and states that are breaking the law?
Sanctuary cities and states feel that they are taking the moral high road.
They feel that they are following the example of Northern states before the Civil War that refused to return runaway slaves.
Like it or not, the federal government (under President Trump or a President Biden) will NOT try to stop those sanctuary cities and states. There are simply too many people who support those cities and states.
If I had my druthers, I would cut off all federal money to those cities and states, but that simply is never going to happen.
Sanctuary cities are actually guilty of harboring criminals. That is against the law. If a private citizen did it they would be arrested.
Sanctuary cities are actually guilty of harboring criminals. That is against the law. If a private citizen did it they would be arrested.
But I am not wrong. Harboring a criminal is a crime.
If I had my druthers, I would cut off all federal money to those cities and states, but that simply is never going to happen.
Here's a well written explanation of why Logical 1 is wrong with some information on why TheParser is correct:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...are-violating-the-law/?utm_term=.b7c1ed2649d1
What do we do when the White House is harboring criminals?
I don’t engage in discussions regarding vague hypotheticals.What do we do when the White House is harboring criminals?
Sanctuary cities are actually guilty of harboring criminals. That is against the law. If a private citizen did it they would be arrested.
Sanctuary cities are actually guilty of harboring criminals. That is against the law. If a private citizen did it they would be arrested.
Sanctuary cities are actually guilty of harboring criminals. That is against the law. If a private citizen did it they would be arrested.
Sanctuary cities are actually guilty of harboring criminals. That is against the law. If a private citizen did it they would be arrested.
So no crimes committed then? Thanks for proving me right! LMAO!
So what are they doing that would get a private citizen arrested? And my second question...…..are you smart enough to understand you are wrong? We will see. LMAO!
Sanctuary cities are actually guilty of harboring criminals. That is against the law. If a private citizen did it they would be arrested.
Sanctuary cities are actually guilty of harboring criminals. That is against the law. If a private citizen did it they would be arrested.
We have a president who every day in office is breaking the law but I'm not hearing any complaints from the right about that. You guys long ago lost the right to claim you are the party of law and order.
Sanctuary cities are actually guilty of harboring criminals. That is against the law. If a private citizen did it they would be arrested.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?