• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Controversial Artist Depicts Obama Trampling The Constitution

American

Trump Grump Whisperer
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Mar 11, 2006
Messages
96,461
Reaction score
33,780
Location
Western Virginia
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Controversial Artist Depicts Obama Trampling The Constitution « CBS Las Vegas


Now this isn't all Obama's fault, but he does symbolize the ideology that seems to hate Constitutional limits, and thinks this country was suppose to be about do-gooders forcing everyone else by legal means to do their idea of good. This has only served to reduce personal freedoms and personal prosperity.
 
Last edited:

Presidents have historically disliked the limits placed on them by the Constitution.

This guy's problem is quite simple: he's a Republican and Obama's a Democrat. Which is fine, that's his right to disagree. But it's not like no Republican Presidents ever stretched the bounds of the Constitution, and it's dishonest partisan hackery to think otherwise.
 

Now this is partisan hackery. Did you even know of this guy before this article? Do you know anything about the man?
 
I disagree. There are quite a few Republicans standing with Obama. This picture obviously shows that there is a division between a group that cares about the Constitution and the people and a group that doesn't. GW Bush is right behind Obama, as is HW Bush. W Bush stretched the Constitution as well, I agree. The thing we have to remember and heed is exactly what the founders said would happen. The greed and power hungry nature of the human being will only be held in check by the Constitution. We, the People, have to ensure they follow it by voting in and out people that do follow it. The thing that kills our country is how scared the legislative branch is to exercise their power. No matter the issue, they never exercise their portion of the checks and balances that are bestowed upon them. The POTUS, whoever it is, runs all over the legislature and they do nothing. The SCOTUS runs all over them, they do nothing. Heck, right now Eric Holder is running all over them, they do nothing. We finally get some people in there (the Tea Party freshmen) that understand the power that is bestowed upon them, and they are demonized as posturers. I don't get it. I wish some Dems would come in that would do the same. I don't care about their beliefs as long as they believe in the Constitution. If they believe in that, we have somewhere to start.
 
The message is a good and valid except that GW Bush should be standing with Obama.
 
It's political art. I disagree with the message, but I'll admit it's effective and I thank God I live in a country where such art is protected.
 
1Perry said:
The message is a good and valid except that GW Bush should be standing with Obama.
Click to expand...

He is standing with him. Or do you mean like right next to him standing on top of the Constitution too?
 
Forty three presidents? Why would he paint Grover Cleveland twice?

Anyway, I like how FDR is applauding. Less so Clinton, but Bush should be right there with Obama.
 
Too bad he can't paint one with every elected official who has disregarded the constitution. Although he would probably need the great wall of China to use as the canvas for that.
 

Classic political cartoon, there - it's been done before in many ways (the suggestion/depiction of the president trampling our rights/consitution/etc) - it's not like it's new.

I don't take offense to such things
 
Well so should Tomas Jefferson, I mean, where in the Constitution does it say he can use the taxpayers money to buy land for the government?

Just to put things into perspective.
 
I like the piece. :shrug:

I even like that Obama is the President doing the trampling.

I would say though, that you can replace Obama with any modern President. Every leader seems to dislike the legal limits placed on him. It's a temptation that power brings - wanting more power. The fact that our Constitution has, more or less, stood the test of time, shows what a strong document it is.

The problem is that increasingly it is not enforced. Guess whose job it is to really enforce it?
 
Kal'Stang said:
Now this is partisan hackery. Did you even know of this guy before this article? Do you know anything about the man?
Click to expand...

Don't know who he is. I can only judge based on the painting. In the post and in the article, the painting is rather small and it's hard to see who anybody else really is. It looks like there's some powdered wigs who are kind of upset (Washington, Jefferson et al, I assume). It looks like that may be an upset Abraham Lincoln (that's interesting -- the man who suspended certain Constitutional rights).

Outside of that, my eyes aren't good enough to see who anybody else is. Still, it's a political piece that seems to me to single out Democrats as opposed to Republicans. Which is fine, he has a right to say that and I have a right to not like his painting.
 
MarineTpartier said:
I disagree. There are quite a few Republicans standing with Obama.
Click to expand...

Look at it, FDR, Clinton and TR are clapping while Obama stomps on the Constitution. If they'd have at least included the Bush's in that, if not Regan, then they'd have something. This painting is partisan crap.
 

So you judge a person based upon one thing without knowing why he did it or anything else. Good job.

Maybe ths will help
 
BooRadley said:
Look at it, FDR, Clinton and TR are clapping while Obama stomps on the Constitution. If they'd have at least included the Bush's in that, if not Regan, then they'd have something. This painting is partisan crap.
Click to expand...

Oh, also, he has Regan standing with Jefferson, Washington, Lincoln and JFK. What a joke.
 
Seeing as he's shown disregard for the constitution more than once, not sure if controversial is the right adjective.
 
So an artist has an opinion. Funny thing though, we all have opinions. So why is this news?
 
I keep looking for Alfred E. Neuman in the crowd. It seems on that sort of intellectual level.
 
haymarket said:
I keep looking for Alfred E. Neuman in the crowd. It seems on that sort of intellectual level.
Click to expand...

Don't invite people to point out that he's the black guy in the front. Because somebody will.
 
haymarket said:
I keep looking for Alfred E. Neuman in the crowd. It seems on that sort of intellectual level.
Click to expand...

I have to disagree with this. The artist took the trouble to do enough research to have some facts to base his opinion on. However, in the end its an artist that nobody has ever heard of sharing his opinions. Its not different than any guy off the street sharing their opinions.
 
Your Star said:
Well so should Tomas Jefferson, I mean, where in the Constitution does it say he can use the taxpayers money to buy land for the government?

Just to put things into perspective.
Click to expand...

The Constitution makes provision for adding states, so how would you get more states?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…