• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Contractor hired to bus migrants

They are passing immigrants along through their land, dumping them on our border, not informing us of quantity, medical issues, etc.

You know, the stuff that's got you upset from the OP.

They are? Because back during the Scarivan days, they were giving us exact numbers along with loads of other data.
 
The name of the company is in at least one article I found online. That's bad publicity.

Monsters like Abbott and DeSantis will always find suckers, for the same reason that there was always some twit willing to work for Trump, no matter how many people he shat on.
 
They are? Because back during the Scarivan days, they were giving us exact numbers along with loads of other data.
That was when they were actively helping them to get here, out of their country. You know. Bussing them. To my knowledge, they've stopped doing that.
 
Same to you. Thanks for the insult.

If it applies to you, that's your problem. If you can't back up your arguments with evidence, then what else is anyone supposed to think?

And when you were jabbering about asylum seekers needing to apply before they get here, that "it is the law", and I posted the relevant law that directly contradicts you, you ran away.
 
If it applies to you, that's your problem. If you can't back up your arguments with evidence, then what else is anyone supposed to think?

And when you were jabbering about asylum seekers needing to apply before they get here, that "it is the law", and I posted the relevant law that directly contradicts you, you ran away.
I don't care what you think. Why do you care what I think?
 
Maybe the US should take care of its homeless before we bring in millions of illegals

Obviously you know nothing about "homeless" anyone.

Most of the time it's a medical problem, not resources. Addiction is a disease not a sin. You treat the disease and the person won't be homeless long.

And don't go off on it, I've been an addictions counselor for 29 years
 
Wynne Transportation

12 million, lol. I wonder who is getting rich off this. I wonder what their connection is to Abbott. What a joke. For 12 million dollars, you could build some decent temp housing that would hold hundreds at a time.

For 12 million, he could BUY each migrant group their own bus or van, and send them on their way.
 
12 million, lol. I wonder who is getting rich off this. I wonder what their connection is to Abbott. What a joke. For 12 million dollars, you could build some decent temp housing that would hold hundreds at a time.

For 12 million, he could BUY each migrant group their own bus or van, and send them on their way.

The obvious question here is what connections exist between Abbott and Wynne Transportation.
 
If it applies to you, that's your problem. If you can't back up your arguments with evidence, then what else is anyone supposed to think?

And when you were jabbering about asylum seekers needing to apply before they get here, that "it is the law", and I posted the relevant law that directly contradicts you, you ran away.
The problem is your partisanship. You aren't interested in the truth It is illegal to enter the U.S. except at a port of entry. Your browser can find it in seconds. Mine could. Yes people can apply for asylum. There are two ways to do it legally. One can apply from their country of origin or one can travel to a port of entry to apply. Your browser can find it in seconds. Mine could. You have no idea what you are talking about and I guess that makes you the lightweight. I rarely insult people but you deserved it.
 
The problem is your partisanship. You aren't interested in the truth
Then why am I asking you for evidence?
It is illegal to enter the U.S. except at a port of entry.
Here we go again:


Any alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States (whether or not at a designated port of arrival and including an alien who is brought to the United States after having been interdicted in international or United States waters), irrespective of such alien’s status, may apply for asylum in accordance with this section or, where applicable, section 1225(b) of this title.
Your browser can find it in seconds. Mine could. Yes people can apply for asylum. There are two ways to do it legally. One can apply from their country of origin or one can travel to a port of entry to apply. Your browser can find it in seconds. Mine could. You have no idea what you are talking about and I guess that makes you the lightweight. I rarely insult people but you deserved it.
See above. You're wrong. You even know you're wrong. You're even wrong about being able to apply from a foreign country. You literally have to be on American soil. You're just not wanting to be honest about it.

So, partisanship. You're not interested in the truth.
 
Then why am I asking you for evidence?

Here we go again:




See above. You're wrong. You even know you're wrong. You're even wrong about being able to apply from a foreign country. You literally have to be on American soil. You're just not wanting to be honest about it.

So, partisanship. You're not interested in the truth.
Yes, I saw that quote before. The issue was not whether the government will allow an illegal alien to seek asylum. The issue was whether or not the alien was illegal. Every alien who enters the U.S. outside of a port of entry is illegal. Why do you ask for evidence? Laziness I guess. Fire up your browser and spend a few seconds learning what you refuse to accept.
 
Yes, I saw that quote before. The issue was not whether the government will allow an illegal alien to seek asylum. The issue was whether or not the alien was illegal. Every alien who enters the U.S. outside of a port of entry is illegal. Why do you ask for evidence? Laziness I guess. Fire up your browser and spend a few seconds learning what you refuse to accept.

If you are requesting asylum per the law, you are not an illegal alien.

You aren't providing a link because you can't provide a link.
 
Back
Top Bottom