- Joined
- Feb 2, 2013
- Messages
- 14,520
- Reaction score
- 3,785
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
Same to you. Thanks for the insult.Yeah, I learned we have another lightweight on the board. Good day.
Same to you. Thanks for the insult.Yeah, I learned we have another lightweight on the board. Good day.
Facts getting in your way?Stop with the burying your head in the sand
The name of the company is in at least one article I found online. That's bad publicity.There is never a shortage of fools.
They are passing immigrants along through their land, dumping them on our border, not informing us of quantity, medical issues, etc.
You know, the stuff that's got you upset from the OP.
Is it Peter pan?The name of the company is in at least one article I found online. That's bad publicity.
That makes sense if you meant to say "deport".Republican states report it. Democrat states do not. It is politics in action.
The name of the company is in at least one article I found online. That's bad publicity.
That was when they were actively helping them to get here, out of their country. You know. Bussing them. To my knowledge, they've stopped doing that.They are? Because back during the Scarivan days, they were giving us exact numbers along with loads of other data.
I'm not going to post it. People can do their own searching.Is it Peter pan?
Just guessing. I'm curious.
Maybe Biden should close the border
Same to you. Thanks for the insult.
I don't care what you think. Why do you care what I think?If it applies to you, that's your problem. If you can't back up your arguments with evidence, then what else is anyone supposed to think?
And when you were jabbering about asylum seekers needing to apply before they get here, that "it is the law", and I posted the relevant law that directly contradicts you, you ran away.
Maybe the US should take care of its homeless before we bring in millions of illegals
Wynne TransportationIs it Peter pan?
Just guessing. I'm curious.
You don't want to help them, either.Maybe the US should take care of its homeless before we bring in millions of illegals
12 million, lol. I wonder who is getting rich off this. I wonder what their connection is to Abbott. What a joke. For 12 million dollars, you could build some decent temp housing that would hold hundreds at a time.Wynne Transportation
![]()
Gov. Greg Abbott’s migrant busing program costs Texas $12 million
Abbott’s office said Chicago will now also become a regular drop-off location in addition to New York City and Washington, D.C.www.texastribune.org
12 million, lol. I wonder who is getting rich off this. I wonder what their connection is to Abbott. What a joke. For 12 million dollars, you could build some decent temp housing that would hold hundreds at a time.
For 12 million, he could BUY each migrant group their own bus or van, and send them on their way.
The problem is your partisanship. You aren't interested in the truth It is illegal to enter the U.S. except at a port of entry. Your browser can find it in seconds. Mine could. Yes people can apply for asylum. There are two ways to do it legally. One can apply from their country of origin or one can travel to a port of entry to apply. Your browser can find it in seconds. Mine could. You have no idea what you are talking about and I guess that makes you the lightweight. I rarely insult people but you deserved it.If it applies to you, that's your problem. If you can't back up your arguments with evidence, then what else is anyone supposed to think?
And when you were jabbering about asylum seekers needing to apply before they get here, that "it is the law", and I posted the relevant law that directly contradicts you, you ran away.
Then why am I asking you for evidence?The problem is your partisanship. You aren't interested in the truth
Here we go again:It is illegal to enter the U.S. except at a port of entry.
Any alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States (whether or not at a designated port of arrival and including an alien who is brought to the United States after having been interdicted in international or United States waters), irrespective of such alien’s status, may apply for asylum in accordance with this section or, where applicable, section 1225(b) of this title.
See above. You're wrong. You even know you're wrong. You're even wrong about being able to apply from a foreign country. You literally have to be on American soil. You're just not wanting to be honest about it.Your browser can find it in seconds. Mine could. Yes people can apply for asylum. There are two ways to do it legally. One can apply from their country of origin or one can travel to a port of entry to apply. Your browser can find it in seconds. Mine could. You have no idea what you are talking about and I guess that makes you the lightweight. I rarely insult people but you deserved it.
Yes, I saw that quote before. The issue was not whether the government will allow an illegal alien to seek asylum. The issue was whether or not the alien was illegal. Every alien who enters the U.S. outside of a port of entry is illegal. Why do you ask for evidence? Laziness I guess. Fire up your browser and spend a few seconds learning what you refuse to accept.Then why am I asking you for evidence?
Here we go again:
![]()
8 U.S. Code § 1158 - Asylum
www.law.cornell.edu
See above. You're wrong. You even know you're wrong. You're even wrong about being able to apply from a foreign country. You literally have to be on American soil. You're just not wanting to be honest about it.
So, partisanship. You're not interested in the truth.
Yes, I saw that quote before. The issue was not whether the government will allow an illegal alien to seek asylum. The issue was whether or not the alien was illegal. Every alien who enters the U.S. outside of a port of entry is illegal. Why do you ask for evidence? Laziness I guess. Fire up your browser and spend a few seconds learning what you refuse to accept.
Typical righty.I don't do requests. Look it up yourself.
No proof needed. Are you denying that the Govs did what they did?I notice you are not including any proof with your ad hominem.
I'm a righty but not a typical one. But I will take your comment as an insult and put it where it belongs.Typical righty.